How is FedEx supposed to know what is in the packages it is shipping. This is another preposterous indictment, where the government is overstepping it's bounds, wanting private companies to do its jobs.
I won't even go to where the government is so interested in keeping a few people from getting a few prescription drugs that they maybe shouldn't be getting, while letting drug smugglers and gang members across the Mexican border without blinking an eye.
What is the priority here?!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Innovative
What is the priority here?! C.O.N.T.R.O.L.
2 posted on
07/17/2014 9:56:56 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Innovative
3 posted on
07/17/2014 9:58:51 PM PDT by
matthew fuller
(It's past time to impeach our illegal alien mooslim marxist president.)
To: Innovative
Is U.S.P.S being prosecuted also??
Thought not.
4 posted on
07/17/2014 10:00:12 PM PDT by
kaehurowing
(FIGHT BULLYING, UNINSTALL FIREFOX)
To: Innovative
Was the U.S. Postal Service also indicted?
To: Innovative
7 posted on
07/17/2014 10:07:03 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: Innovative
At least FedEx didn’t bend over for .gov like most all of the telecoms did.
10 posted on
07/17/2014 10:18:24 PM PDT by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: Innovative
11 posted on
07/17/2014 10:19:51 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Innovative
And even if FedEx knew what was in a package, how in the world would it know the recipient didn’t have a prescription for it, as the article claimed? What, FedEx has access to our medical records? Preposterous!
12 posted on
07/17/2014 10:22:15 PM PDT by
LibWhacker
(A New WPA: Hire blacks to surround illegal enclaves and round up job-stealing illegal aliens)
To: Innovative
to people that the company knew had no prescriptions Does this mean that the U.S. Postal Service verifies that everyone receiving medications by mail has a valid prescription? Don't count on it.
I would not be a bit surprised to find out that Fedex has been found guilty of donating to the wrong party/politicians, and this is the response.
I l already know that Fedex is on Lefty hit lists for "tax dodging", along with Exxon, Chevron, and other companies they love to hate.
13 posted on
07/17/2014 10:31:14 PM PDT by
ApplegateRanch
(Love me, love my guns!©)
To: Innovative
15 posted on
07/17/2014 10:53:38 PM PDT by
Salamander
(He ain't heavy, he's my Boa.)
To: Innovative
Most of the home delivery of medications is a direct result of HMO's in some cases demanding that their mail order pharmacy be used. In other cases only mail order companies will fill certain prescriptions due to a paper billing process walk in pharmacies won't deal with. This is true with things like inhalants for Nebulizer use.
This looks more like someone wants a government agency created just to once again but into peoples private business and draw a federal government employee paycheck and the political clout of heading such an agency.
We rely on FED EX several times a month for medical needs. Also just because a product comes from an on line pharmaceutical company doesn't mean it is only sending Meds or even illicit ones. Diabetic testing supplies, Ostomy supplies, wound bandages, etc are also ordered and shipped on line. Suppliers use FED EX because they are cheaper and most of the time faster. When you're dealing with temperature sensitive medications time matters.
16 posted on
07/17/2014 11:15:00 PM PDT by
cva66snipe
((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
To: Innovative
Apparently they didn’t give enough money to democrat candidates.
17 posted on
07/17/2014 11:15:20 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
To: Innovative
Isn’t FedEx in competition with the Post Office?
18 posted on
07/17/2014 11:21:10 PM PDT by
BykrBayb
(World Lung Cancer Day {WLCD} Aug 1 https://facebook.com/events/309580722464921 ~ Þ)
To: Innovative
“The issue is never the issue. The issue is the revolution.”
Dr Ferris’s comment to Hank Reardon is also applicable.
19 posted on
07/17/2014 11:25:04 PM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Innovative
20 posted on
07/17/2014 11:27:52 PM PDT by
dadfly
To: Innovative
Gummit. Will. Get. Laughed. Out. Of. Court.
21 posted on
07/17/2014 11:31:47 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Innovative
the Dems want more money.
23 posted on
07/17/2014 11:40:05 PM PDT by
RginTN
To: Innovative
What is the priority here?! Seriously? Money in the form of forced contributions to mr. mulato and his minions, only they are not cute and yellow, oh no, fudge packers take on a distinctly different coloration.
24 posted on
07/17/2014 11:58:23 PM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Innovative
I disagree as to the purpose. This is about loot. This is how the govt is trying to finance itself. They’ve just about run out of big banks to sue so they’re looking for other deep pockets. Now the EPA is suing companies with the dual purpose of control and money but this is purely about cash.
25 posted on
07/18/2014 12:52:41 AM PDT by
wiggen
(The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
To: Innovative
Is it true that UPS is union and FedEx is not?
Maybe the Feds are just trying to help “working families”.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson