Posted on 07/09/2014 12:11:09 PM PDT by PoloSec
The proposition is simple: Install a device in your car and allow your insurance company to monitor your drivinghow fast you drive, how hard you brake, how sharply you corner, and so on. In exchange, it will give you a discount on your premiums.
That might sound alarming, but it shouldnt be surprising. Considering internet users already happily trade data on every online move they make in exchange for free services, the only surprise is tracking-based insurance isnt already more widespread. Progressive Insurance, the biggest such insurer in the United States, says it found that
After analysis of billions of miles in driving data, Progressive has found that key driving behaviorslike actual miles driven, braking, and time of day of drivingcarry more than twice the predictive power of traditional insurance rating variables, like a drivers age, gender and the year, make and model of the insured vehicle.
The average discount on premiums for a Progressive customer who agrees to be tracked is between 10% and 15%.
In future, if you dont agree to be tracked, you may not only pay higher premiums; perhaps you wont even be eligible for insurance from most companies. It could be like having a shady credit history, or failing to provide the basic know-your-customer information required to open a bank account. In the end, serving the naysayers may become a specialty market niche for some carriers, suggests a recent report (pdf) on usage-base insurance programs from Deloitte.
This was offered by my insurance company, but I opted to pay the higher premium. F that nonsense.
The Grand Socialist picture. Progressive management is about as far left as you can get, so I am told.
I would class action them.
Nunyuh....
I’ll do my best to say no to a monitor for as long as possible.
They’ll tell the InsCo if they think something is wrong, but will they tell YOU? Even if you wanted your life to be a fishbowl, who says the glass isn’t from a fun house mirror?
What is now voluntary will eventually be mandatory.
I don't think so.
I’ve pretty much decided to drive naked from here on. Fines for not having insurance way less than premiums and I only get stopped once every 20 years or so. Insurance status isn’t checked here when purchasing license tabs, etc.
The real goal is to base your vehicle taxes on where and how much you drive.
They experimented with it a few years ago, and got massive negative responses. Now by mandating it through insurance, it is ok (since insurance is a tax/or something)
Measuring acceleration/decelaration is one thing, as long as they don't track frequent destinations, driving in "bad" sections of town, etc.
-PJ
They don’t track where you go. There is no location information recorded, though that could change.
Any pre-OBDII system vehicle owner should be able to sue the pants off them for discriminatory practice.
While I'm at it, the implant in arm monitors my eating, sleeping, and lifestyle habits to get a 'cheaper' rate via ObamaRomneyHeritageCare.
But it will not mind if you are gay.
Did you know that if you are in an accident with no insurance, the other person’s insurance co can and will sue you for every nickel it cost
They will get a judgement and then collect it all bu liens, garnishments and attachments of assets.
For offering to buy information from you? Where's the tort?
I’m pretty sick of those commercials with bitch Flo, and the damn lizard too!
> This was offered by my insurance company, but I opted to pay the higher premium. F that nonsense.
Yes. F this nonsense. You give into that the next thing you know they’ll want to install cares in your house to see what you eat, tell you what type and when you need to exercise, and what you can and can’t eat. The slippery slope just got steeper and they are Teflon’ing the ramp....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.