that’s the whole point of a case-by-case basis.
if they’re pissed why did they hear the case?
Leftists just love coercion, so much so that thwarting it is seen as a violation of their own freedom.
Sotomayor disagreed. She said the injunction risks depriving hundreds of Wheatons employees and students of their legal entitlement to contraceptive coverage.
Oh, they’re so entitled, aren’t they, Mrs. Wise Latina... how did this idiot get onto the court? Same way as Kagan I expect.
Thank God this was put on hold. Total fascism.
Oh boo hop. The justices are following standard procedure and law for allowing a non-inmposition while awaiting further decisions.
Jeeze, don’t count your chickens....
Dumbed-down low information voters need simple language they can understand.
The ability to not pay for services not wanted nor needed should extend right down to the individual.
When has there ever bean a right to free birth control/abortions?
Never, the lib idiots just made it up.
Now they’re crying because some won’t go along with it in order to protect a true constitutional right— freedom of religion.
Oh noes its a war on WOOOOOMEN! /s
These people are nothing but modern day stalinists.
Basically, those who object need not sign EBSA Form 700 - NOW all they have to do is file a letter with the government stating the college’s religious objection.
It’s all about not having to sign EBSA Form 700 (the college didn’t want to participate in the coverage being kicked down the road where the government could tell a third party to provide the contraceptive) — by signing this govt form, they would have been the trigger to getting this coverage.
The government can do whatever (as we’ve seen) so there is something about how this ruling (the college being allowed by the SC decision NOT TO SIGN EBSA Form 700) will effect other decisions that has us witnessing the fury of the Leftist SC justices and their accusation of a Supreme Court bait and switch (with this ruling following on the heels of the earlier Hobby Lobby decision).
...saying the court was retreating from assurances offered only days ago....
Did anyone ask Bart Stupak how much an 0bnama assurance is worth??
Using the Leftist logic, I should be entitled to free guns and ammo, since the 2nd amendment entitles me to have them.
Nothing in this interim order affects the ability of the applicants employees and students to obtain, without cost, the full range of FDA approved contraceptives, the order said.”
So then who is paying for it?
Isn’t it true that none of these three Leftists would be on the Court if Republicans hadn’t voted to confirm them?
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
The democrats want to chip away at religious liberty, and they have done some of it through obamacare. They are furious that their progress in taking away religious liberty has been reversed a bit by the court decisions, hence the kicking, stomping, and screaming.
What the democrats are trying to do is that anyone who has religious convictions should cast those convictions and principles aside if they want to start a business. So if you are a observant christian or a jew, you either cannot run a business because of your faith principles, or you take the choice of casting them aside to earn a living.
Extreme left wing tyranny on the march.
Should Sonia and company be aborted?
This is why Bush should have nominated Janice Rogers Brown to the court rather than Roberts as CJ.
Hobby Lobby is a closely held private corporation owned by religious individuals.
This college is a religious-based not-for-profit. There’s a HUGE difference, and any rational person would see that upholding this religious institutions rights to free exercise is NOT a “reversal” of the limited guarantees in the Hobby Lobby case.
The fact is, this gives almost perfect confirmation that the Liberals on the Court would favor forcing churches to violate their beliefs, should such a case come before them.
Props to Thurgood Marshall
We now have a Justice dumber than he was