Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: McDaniel Supporters Barred From Reviewing Voter Rolls in Three Mississippi Counties
Gateway Pundit ^ | 6/27/14 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 06/27/2014 8:46:23 AM PDT by blueyon

Breaking– The Chris McDaniel campaign identified multiple Mississippi counties in which enough improper ballots were cast that a legal challenge to the outcome of the election is warranted. This comes after 25,000-35,000 Democrat votes helped push Thad Cochran to victory over Chris McDaniel (by 6,880 votes) in the June 24 runoff.

The McDaniel campaign has already found 1,000 examples in one county of Democrats who voted in the June 3rd primary as Democrats and then crossed over into the Republican primary this week. This is illegal and their votes should not be counted.

Update—– Lindsay Krout, an independent contractor working in Mississippi, was barred from reviewing voter rolls in Lafayette County Mississippi Friday morning.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: criminalconspiracy; democrats; democratscandals; fixisin; gop; govtabuse; howtostealanelection; mcdaniel; mississippi; teaparty; thadcochran; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-295 next last
To: Beagle8U
-- They voted twice in the primary, and THAT is a felony! --

It took me some time to track this one down. The applicable statute is Mississippi Code 97-13-35 - Voting; by unqualified person, or at more than one place, or for both parties in same primary.

Any person who shall vote at any election, not being legally qualified, or who shall vote in more than one county, or at more than one place in any county or in any city, town, or village entitled to separate representation, or who shall vote out of the district of his legal domicile, or who shall vote or attempt to vote in the primary election of one party when he shall have voted on the same date in the primary election of another party, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be fined not exceeding two hundred dollars, or be imprisoned in the county jail not more than six months, or both.
For the careful parser out there who notices the "same date" qualifier, that's covered too. The runoff is deemed to be part of the original primary, and for legal purposes, the primary and runoff are one election, held on the same day.

MS AG Op., Brown (April 7, 1988) 1988 WL 250048

There is, however, a statutory prohibition to "crossover" voting. Crossover voting may be defined as participation in the first primary of one political party and participation in the runoff primary of another party. Several Attorney General's opinions and case law has defined the first and second primary as one election process. The runoff primary has been described as a continuation of the first primary. Therefore, Miss. Code Ann. AS: 97-13-35 (1972), which prohibits participation in more than one primary on the same day, has been interpreted to prohibit crossover voting.

201 posted on 06/27/2014 12:28:25 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
I said this before, these are the people that we're supposed to trust to get to the bottom of the IRS scandal, the NSA scandal, the BLM showdown, etc?

Is this thuggery now an indicator of what they will do in Washington?

A legal defense foundation has to step in now and the courts to issue injunctions and preserve documents and allow access.

-PJ

202 posted on 06/27/2014 12:29:58 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

203 posted on 06/27/2014 12:45:08 PM PDT by mikrofon (Founders BUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; don-o
Text of statement by Hinds County Republican Party Chairman Pete Perry - Madison County Journal - Madison County Mississippi, June 27, 2014

"Yesterday afternoon, someone claiming to represent the Mississippi State Tea Party held a press conference in this Courthouse to make some careless accusations about the voting in Hinds County for the Republican nomination for United States Senate. This morning, I'd like to provide some facts in response.

First of all, some background on the election mechanics in Hinds County:

Hinds County has 118 precincts each of which has 3 to 5 poll workers who are hired by the County Republican Executive Committee and are paid $100 for a 14 to 15 hour day. Many of the 500 or so Hinds County citizens who work as poll workers have been working the same ballot boxes for years. They take pride in their work, their involvement with the community, and their participation in the democratic process. I am certain that on June 24th, there were McDaniel supporters, Cochran supporters, and even the rare undecided voter working as poll workers in Hinds County.

I provide this background on the poll workers because of their essential role in this process. When each voter comes to the polling station, the poll workers check the registration books and the voter's identification before providing them a ballot. If there is a challenge to a voter's eligibility by a poll watcher from a campaign, the poll workers rule on their eligibility or provide an affidavit ballot to the voter. After the polls close, at each precinct, the poll workers download the election results, tally the absentee ballots for the precinct, and then return everything to the Courthouse where their results are added to the others.

To help the poll workers navigate the election legalities and the ever- changing technology of the voting machines, we have training classes for the poll workers. For this election cycle, we conducted more than two dozen classes to train these workers. Prior to the June 24th run-off, we had additional classes to address the upcoming runoff election. One of the key subjects of this supplemental training was that for the run-off, nobody that voted in the June 3rd Democrat primary could vote in the June 24th Republican run-off. Additional material was given to all poll workers addressing this specific issue.

To help prevent mistakes, the Republican and Democrat parties switch the poll books for each precinct for a run-off. Since we don't register by political party in Mississippi, the poll books list all voters. The theory of switching the poll books is that if a Republican poll worker is using the book that was used by the Democrats in the first election, then when a voter comes to vote in the Republican run-off, the poll worker can quickly see if the voter's name is checked as having voted in the first Democrat primary.

As I understand it, the complaint by the representative of the Tea Party yesterday was that 'they had found over 800 instances of June 3 voters in the Democrat primary who illegally voted in the June 24 runoff election.'

Instead of making wild accusations which stir up social media with cries of fraud and corruption, it would be much better for all involved D- the voters, the candidates, the 500 poll workers in Hinds County D- if we let facts enter into the conversation. And the facts are that their claims are wildly exaggerated. As a committee, we are still in the process of going through the election results before they can be certified, but this morning we can discuss some of the specific examples that were raised yesterday.

As an example in Precinct 14, the Fondren Presbyterian Church precinct, the numbers cited by the McDaniel campaign yesterday included 192 'illegal votes' -- people that they claimed had voted in the Democrat primary on June 3rd but then voted in the Republican run-off. That is impossible. According to the certified results of the June 3rd Democrat primary, there were only 37 total Democrat primary voters at that particular precinct. I am providing you with a redacted copy of a sample page from the poll books used at that precinct.

A simple look at this page shows what Ms. Overscheld is claiming as illegal votes. This is nothing more than an instance where a poll worker started marking an individual's vote in the June 3rd column, rather than in the June 24th column. At some point the worker realized his or her mistake and corrected it D- crossing out the 'voted' notation in the June 3rd column and moving it to its proper place. That is the correct procedure for the managers -- but the McDaniel campaign is claiming that this is an example of illegal votes.

Ms. Overscheld was aware of this and other similar instances when she made her statement yesterday, but continued with her charade trying to provide known inflated numbers. In fact, when she made her statement yesterday, she had inflated their own numbers to make it appear to be worse than they had actually found. Later that night, the candidate himself again inflated the numbers to now being 'over 1000.' Elections are about specifics, not generalities. We count and account for each and every vote; we do not inflate or deflate numbers for campaign purposes.

We have not gone through every voter accused yesterday by Ms. Oversheld but we will do so before we complete our canvass of all the election matters. I am confident that as we continue to look at the specific cases, this bogus number cited yesterday will be reduced significantly.

Instead of crying fraud or illegality or corruption -- rhetoric that is designated to inflame passions -- it would be helpful if those making wild accusations would consider other possibilities.

For example, one of the 800 plus 'illegal voters' accused yesterday was cast by a lady who attempted to vote in the Pinehaven precinct. She came to vote in the Republican primary on June 24th and the poll worker checked the poll book and saw that she was marked as having voted in the Democrat primary on June 3rd so the poll worker denied her a ballot. One problem though D- she was in the hospital on June 3rd. She had a colonoscopy that day and did not vote. No corruption, no fraud, just a simple human mistake. A clerical error was made by a Democrat poll worker on June 3rd.

Those mistakes happen. And I'm sure that some mistakes happened on Tuesday in the Republican primary. I'm sure that there were mistakes in Hinds County, Jones County and every one of the 82 counties in the State, and that both candidates were affected positively and negatively. That's what happens, when in Hinds County alone, 500 one-day workers -- moreso volunteers than professionals -- process and tally the 25,000 voters on election day.

I am very pleased with how the election went in Hinds County on Tuesday. The more than 500 people involved with running the election operated in a professional manner and helped participate in a record voter turnout. As a lifelong Republican, it is very gratifying to me personally to see so many new voters in the Republican primary not just in Hinds County but across the state."


204 posted on 06/27/2014 12:47:50 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; All
To anyone interested, here's some data from the Primary election. Percentages for Cochran and McDaniel are only against each other (discounting Dem and Carey votes):

County Dem Tot Cochran McDaniel Carey %Coch (H2H) %McDan (H2H)
Adams 1307 1492 1219 16 55 45
Alcorn 738 1362 1224 15 52.7 47.3
Amite 656 604 984 19 38 62
Attala 752 874 1008 18 46.4 53.6
Benton 306 218 238 6 47.8 52.2
Bolivar 1378 1272 583 10 68.6 31.4
Calhoun 419 782 646 15 54.8 45.2
Carroll 586 722 618 6 53.9 46.1
Chickasaw 891 719 588 12 55 45
Choctaw 342 574 620 17 48.1 51.9
Claiborne 787 161 112 0 59 41
Clarke 638 926 1245 24 42.7 57.3
Clay 1384 1084 616 12 63.8 36.2
Coahoma 1109 611 298 7 67.2 32.8
Copiah 1237 1373 1287 15 51.6 48.4
Covington 597 698 1823 43 27.7 72.3
DeSoto 1219 5174 9078 180 36.3 63.7
Forrest 1463 4316 5265 162 45 55
Franklin 315 508 674 9 43 57
George 317 1233 2220 83 35.7 64.3
Greene 167 418 983 33 29.8 70.2
Grenada 1338 876 943 12 48.2 51.8
Hancock 395 3631 3221 259 53 47
Harrison 2395 13113 9480 985 58 42
Hinds 13834 10928 5621 91 66 34
Holmes 1292 365 257 3 58.7 41.3
Humphreys 675 391 181 0 68.4 31.6
Issaquena 125 92 37 0 71.3 28.7
Itawamba 502 1248 1316 38 48.7 51.3
Jackson 2097 8787 9083 539 49.2 50.8
Jasper 904 639 1654 29 27.9 72.1
Jeff Davis 775 432 660 11 39.6 60.4
Jefferson 812 121 95 3 56 44
Jones 1391 1816 11025 126 14.1 85.9
Kemper 490 414 334 4 55.3 44.7
Lafayette 935 2793 1513 36 64.9 35.1
Lamar 602 4015 5927 241 40.4 59.6
Lauderdale 1365 4929 3867 58 56 44
Lawrence 571 751 795 17 48.6 51.4
Leake 780 886 764 11 53.7 46.3
Lee 1846 5111 3800 89 57.4 42.6
Leflore 1355 1165 383 7 75.3 24.7
Lincoln 845 2428 1996 56 54.9 45.1
Lowndes 1531 3194 2152 43 59.7 40.3
Madison 2433 9093 5678 93 61.6 38.4
Marion 851 1182 2274 56 34.2 65.8
Marshall 1240 859 1223 37 41.3 58.7
Monroe 1232 1802 1618 30 52.7 47.3
Montgomery 777 523 519 12 50.2 49.8
Neshoba 448 1508 1336 29 53 47
Newton 519 1337 1267 22 51.3 48.7
Noxubee 500 336 272 2 55.3 44.7
Oktibbeha 1159 2753 1353 28 67 33
Panola 1369 1179 1100 25 51.7 48.3
Pearl River 514 2140 4618 209 31.7 68.3
Perry 246 697 1188 60 37 63
Pike 1327 1783 1682 41 51.5 48.5
Pontotoc 574 1783 1633 42 52.2 47.8
Prentiss 1286 902 718 13 55.7 44.3
Quitman 577 215 129 5 62.5 37.5
Rankin 1593 12392 12005 259 50.8 49.2
Scott 635 1070 1059 18 50.3 49.7
Sharkey 295 320 86 1 78.8 21.2
Simpson 720 1725 1576 40 52.3 47.7
Smith 370 798 1793 22 30.8 69.2
Stone 201 1259 1412 96 47.1 52.9
Sunflower 1411 771 358 6 68.3 31.7
Tallahatchie 874 452 248 7 64.6 35.4
Tate 587 1021 1617 18 38.7 61.3
Tippah 451 1025 1012 19 50.3 49.7
Tishomingo 521 831 904 27 47.9 52.1
Tunica 260 235 86 3 73.2 26.8
Union 548 1629 1231 30 57 43
Walthall 434 670 710 11 48.6 51.4
Warren 1519 2432 2008 28 54.8 45.2
Washington 1810 1455 606 16 70.6 29.4
Wayne 804 591 2108 59 21.9 78.1
Webster 266 815 758 25 51.8 48.2
Wilkinson 262 159 204 4 43.8 56.2
Winston 686 912 734 13 55.4 44.6
Yalobusha 804 582 547 10 51.6 48.4
Yazoo 773 1172 937 13 55.6 44.4

205 posted on 06/27/2014 12:49:03 PM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

In most states it would be a felony. Oh well, give them 6 months in jail then.


206 posted on 06/27/2014 1:03:55 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

All of this is because people who are not Republicans CAN vote in Republican primaries. Duh.


207 posted on 06/27/2014 1:05:16 PM PDT by Squeako (The radicals are the wolves. The moderates are the wolves in sheep's clothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: All
For the Excel addicts, here's some numbers from the runoff election. The last two column show the percentage point increase from the primary and the vote total increase from the primary for Cochran:

County Cochran McDaniel Coch% McDan % Coch % Inc Coch Tot Inc
Adams 1917 1485 56.3 43.7 1.3 159
Alcorn 1855 1842 50.2 49.8 -2.5 -125
Amite 680 1262 35 65 -3 -202
Attala 979 1154 45.9 54.1 -0.5 -41
Benton 261 401 39.4 60.6 -8.4 -120
Bolivar 1877 734 71.9 28.1 3.3 454
Calhoun 944 749 55.8 44.2 1 59
Carroll 926 829 52.8 47.2 -1.1 -7
Chickasaw 798 721 52.5 47.5 -2.5 -54
Choctaw 650 641 50.3 49.7 2.3 55
Claiborne 283 108 72.4 27.6 13.4 126
Clarke 936 1518 38.1 61.9 -4.5 -263
Clay 1386 766 64.4 35.6 0.6 152
Coahoma 1050 345 75.3 24.7 8.1 392
Copiah 1760 1419 55.4 44.6 3.7 255
Covington 812 2115 27.7 72.3 0.1 -178
DeSoto 5977 13664 30.4 69.6 -5.9 -3783
Forrest 5345 5574 49 51 3.9 720
Franklin 633 746 45.9 54.1 2.9 53
George 967 2410 28.6 71.4 -7.1 -456
Greene 389 1117 25.8 74.2 -4 -163
Grenada 1254 1270 49.7 50.3 1.5 51
Hancock 3100 3301 48.4 51.6 -4.6 -611
Harrison 14203 10355 57.8 42.2 -0.2 215
Hinds 17949 6964 72 28 6 5678
Holmes 668 296 69.3 30.7 10.6 264
Humphreys 811 214 79.1 20.9 10.8 387
Issaquena 127 50 71.8 28.2 0.4 22
Itawamba 1536 1636 48.4 51.6 -0.3 -32
Jackson 10311 10004 50.8 49.2 1.6 603
Jasper 855 1932 30.7 69.3 2.8 -62
Jeff Davis 546 760 41.8 58.2 2.2 14
Jefferson 321 111 74.3 25.7 18.3 184
Jones 2764 12640 17.9 82.1 3.8 -667
Kemper 486 429 53.1 46.9 -2.2 -23
Lafayette 3926 1935 67 33 2.1 711
Lamar 4450 6391 41 59 0.7 -29
Lauderdale 6163 4763 56.4 43.6 0.4 338
Lawrence 904 940 49 51 0.4 8
Leake 1059 979 52 48 -1.7 -42
Lee 6363 4666 57.7 42.3 0.3 386
Leflore 1541 413 78.9 21.1 3.6 346
Lincoln 3021 2186 58 42 3.1 403
Lowndes 3973 2668 59.8 40.2 0.1 263
Madison 11693 6493 64.3 35.7 2.7 1785
Marion 1333 2725 32.8 67.2 -1.4 -300
Marshall 1029 1938 34.7 65.3 -6.6 -545
Monroe 2260 1922 54 46 1.4 154
Montgomery 586 563 51 49 0.8 19
Neshoba 1900 1605 54.2 45.8 1.2 123
Newton 1453 1578 47.9 52.1 -3.4 -195
Noxubee 401 302 57 43 1.8 35
Oktibbeha 3704 1516 71 29 3.9 788
Panola 1345 1730 43.7 56.3 -8 -464
Pearl River 2136 5758 27.1 72.9 -4.6 -1144
Perry 667 1385 32.5 67.5 -4.5 -227
Pike 2336 2046 53.3 46.7 1.9 189
Pontotoc 2207 1895 53.8 46.2 1.6 162
Prentiss 1080 904 54.4 45.6 -1.2 -8
Quitman 326 173 65.3 34.7 2.8 67
Rankin 14902 13374 52.7 47.3 1.9 1141
Scott 1289 1358 48.7 51.3 -1.6 -80
Sharkey 557 115 82.9 17.1 4.1 208
Simpson 1927 1688 53.3 46.7 1 90
Smith 901 1997 31.1 68.9 0.3 -101
Stone 1251 1509 45.3 54.7 -1.8 -105
Sunflower 1186 428 73.5 26.5 5.2 345
Tallahatchie 588 330 64.1 35.9 -0.5 54
Tate 1185 2252 34.5 65.5 -4.2 -471
Tippah 1243 1518 45 55 -5.3 -288
Tishomingo 1042 1101 48.6 51.4 0.7 14
Tunica 363 121 75 25 1.8 93
Union 2043 1618 55.8 44.2 -1.2 27
Walthall 815 935 46.6 53.4 -2 -80
Warren 3128 2197 58.7 41.3 4 507
Washington 2345 844 73.5 26.5 2.9 652
Wayne 766 2422 24 76 2.1 -139
Webster 870 923 48.5 51.5 -3.3 -110
Wilkinson 212 294 41.9 58.1 -1.9 -37
Winston 1263 1012 55.5 44.5 0.1 73
Yalobusha 719 659 52.2 47.8 0.6 25
Yazoo 1701 1084 61.1 38.9 5.5 382

208 posted on 06/27/2014 1:05:32 PM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

So he can just claim a mistake and that ends it...............


209 posted on 06/27/2014 1:07:50 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; All

I am somewhat skeptical, as the picture yesterday clearly shoved REPUBLICAN voters who voted in a Republican primary, not Dems as claimed.

But, if true, it needs pursued. Disturbing they won’t allow inspection.


210 posted on 06/27/2014 1:14:58 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
I hope McDaniel has the guts to fight this to the bitter end.

Neither the establishment Democrats or Republicans ever want to turn over the election-fraud rocks, because they both have their fingerprints on them.

The TEA party ain't the establishment. Let loose the election-fraud rocks of war. Let Democrats and Republicans alike go to jail.

211 posted on 06/27/2014 1:20:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
"As God is my witness I will never vote for an establishment Republican again."?

I won't say that, because Ted Cruz, Allen West, or Trey Gowdy might run as an R. But I will only vote for them, or someone just like them---in other words, solid, true conservatives. Anyone else? Nope, I'm done.

212 posted on 06/27/2014 1:21:27 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
For the six counties showing the greatest percentage point gain for Cochran, Democrat voters made up at least 45% of the primary totals in each county:

County Dem % (Tot Primary) Coch % Inc Coch Tot Inc
Jefferson 78.8 18.3 184
Claiborne 74.2 13.4 126
Humphreys 54.1 10.8 387
Holmes 67.4 10.6 264
Coahoma 54.8 8.1 392
Hinds 45.4 6 5678

These six counties alone produced a 7,000-vote gain for Cochran in the run-off. These six counties showed a total of 18,500 Democrat votes in the earlier primary.

213 posted on 06/27/2014 1:21:36 PM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Dang, I need to pay closer attention. You said ESTABLISHMENT Republican.

*never mind*


214 posted on 06/27/2014 1:22:37 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

The counties to go after here are Hinds, Madison, Oktibbeha, Humphreys, and Holmes. Those five counties should show plenty of illegal Democrat re-votes.


215 posted on 06/27/2014 1:27:18 PM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Now the lawyers know where to look!


216 posted on 06/27/2014 1:28:46 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

so can the candidate himself see all the records ???


217 posted on 06/27/2014 1:29:17 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

but the fault lies with the poll workers,
and probably not with the uninformed voters.
______________________________________

its still illegal..

those votes should be disqualified,


218 posted on 06/27/2014 1:31:07 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

The RNC will make sure this vote fraud is overlooked and covered up. Gotta keep their boy Thad in office.


219 posted on 06/27/2014 1:43:43 PM PDT by navyguy (The National Reset Button is pushed with the trigger finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

That’s O.K.

I like all of them. They are not Establishment, i.e Chris Christie, “Mittens” Romney, any Bushes living or yet to be born, etc.


220 posted on 06/27/2014 1:45:03 PM PDT by ZULU (Impeach Obama NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson