FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
Reid’s response was predictable. Go nuclear for all appointments....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3172625/posts
The Hero of Benghazi seems to be having some difficulty.
Better put some ice on that Odungo.
Expect the Dems to somehow create extended recesses under the next GOP Prez.
PLENTY of time to get THIS out .... UNSPUN.
So when does his trial start? Or is the constitution not supposed to protect us from tyrants?
Does this mean those he illegally “appointed” will be removed? I can’t wait to see that not happen.
9-0 on ANYTHING is pretty astonishing!
If he chooses wrong on something that gets ruled 9-0, then we cannot trust his judgment on what a “smidgen” of corruption is.
Obama could take a cue from President Lincoln or President Jackson and just IGNORE the US Supreme Court ... :-) ...
Something tells me even the libs on the court are starting to fear a dictatorship and the inevitable response from the People.
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
Well, there was no law to break. )Prosecutor here). That is a term of art for committing a crime. In fact, every single POTUS who did it before was just as “guilty”.
Good ruling by POTUS as each Branch should be able to decide what it “does”. The future problem here is that SCOTUS will likely take the same position on Executive Orders.
But, good decision though meaningless since filibusters don’t apply to appointments. This was an archaic Constitutional Rule from when Congress only met a few months out of the year.
Oooooh! So, who would actually do anything about it?
And now surely the White House will comply with the law. Mr Holder will ensure it.
And just exactly what does this little piece of paper mean? Oh I know what folks want it to mean but I look at the facts as they are. The court issues a ruling....are those people gone from the NLRB? NO! In fact they still sit there making decisions. And what of the decisions that have already been made? Are they still in effect? YES! And until they are successfully challenged in court they remain in effect. And by the time the case gets to SCOTUS who knows how it will be decided. So tell me now exactly what is the good news? What has changed?
NOTHING!
Obviously, the Justices need to take a refresher course in Constitutional law taught by the great constitutional scholar, Barak Obama. (/sarcasm) Wasn’t that the line of hooey that we were being feed back in 2008? I think that some graduates of the University of Chicago Law School should be given tuition refunds.
9 people to audit by the IRS.
*APPLAUSE*
Takes his pen away, ONCE AND FOR ALL!
9-0! AMAZING!