rest of story and video
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/irs-commissioner-insists-law-hasnt-been-broken-admits-he-doesnt-know-law_795673.html
Lying is the default setting on these politicians.
and he had some stupid laughable comment about giving up practicing law for Lent
NOTE TO ISSA’S COMMITTEE:
Can some of you for just once give up your face time and give it to Trey Gowdy.
Some of the questioning is just a waste of time. We need someone who knows how to ask questions AND FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS
The IRS stance is “We’re ALWAYS right”.. even in front of a Congressional committee.
If he doesn’t know the law then how does he know he didn’t break it? I know, logic doesn’t apply with these people.
IRS officials REALLY think anything they do is legal, because they ARE the law.
He's been coached and promised, by the Democrats on the committee, to just smile and remain calm because there is NOTHING that congress can do to him. And he has NO worries about Eric Holder's Justice Department.
He's a smug, arrogant asswipe, and I fear he's going to get away with everything, as he's been promised.
Trey Gowdy played the Smirking Pissant for a fool.
I heard that clip on the news on KLBJ in Austin earlier. I guess the LIVs will never believe any wrong was done, but that is the goal of 0 bummer and his entire administration.
Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, and lie some more.
Lather, rinse and repeat. Take out all opposition to your agenda.
Ignorance of the law is no defense for the peasants, but it is for the apparatchiks.
And the sob is smirking because he knows full well that nothing , other than a few tongue lashings will become of this. In other words, he will not be prosecuted, imprisoned, or fired. And each time my blood pressure skyrockets and I see red, I have to remind myself, this is what a majority of voters voted for in 2008. And as the great, all knowing, sage from AZ, the darling of the citizens of AZ, so eloquently stated, The Country has nothing to fear from an Obama Administration”. Or words to that effect. Along with the thought of this is what the majority of those that voted said, by way of their votes, they wanted. Then tranquility sets in. And I reflect, how could I have such unkind thoughts about the messiah the people who vote and live in the United States. I deliberately did not use the term “American” because no American voted for Obama.
I just wish that Gowdy or someone had asked him point blank: “Is it your sworn testimony that the lost e-mails contained no communication between Lois Lerner and the White House regarding the improper targeting of conservatives by the IRS?”
Obviously, he can make no such claim, yet he implied it with his parroting of the “no evidence” Democrat talking point, so making him acknowledge that would be worth seeing.
When the Commissioner of Internal Revenue' conducts an examination of a tax return and determines that a taxpayer has not reported income, he issues a deficiency notice on that unreported income.
Traditionally, when the deficiency notice was presented to the court by he Commissioner, a presumption of correctness attached to it, establishing, prima facie, that the taxpayer owed the tax as assessed by the Commissioner.
To rebut this presumption and avoid a dismissal of the action in the Commissioner's favor, the taxpayer must prove that the deficiency determination has been issued arbitrarily or erroneously.
The presumption of correctness is an important procedural device for the Commissioner because it places the burden of producing the evidence on the taxpayer. Traditionally, courts have denied taxpayer motions to shift this burden of proof to the Commissioner.
Another hearing is suppose to be starting soon.
This doesn’t appear to be on cable tv. Fox doesn’t find it interesting.