Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Ted Cruz Can Be Born in Canada and Still Become President of the U.S.
The Atlantic ^ | May 2013 | DAVID A. GRAHAMMAY

Posted on 06/11/2014 11:18:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

~~snip~~ (just the facts, ma'am).

But what won't prevent Cruz from becoming president is his place of birth. Cruz was born in Calgary, Canada, while his parents were living there. His father is now an American citizen, but was not at the time; his mother, however, was born in the United States.

Helpfully, the Congressional Research Service gathered all of the information relevant to Cruz's case a few years ago, at the height (nadir?) of Obama birtherism. In short, the Constitution says that the president must be a natural-born citizen. "The weight of scholarly legal and historical opinion appears to support the notion that 'natural born Citizen' means one who is entitled under the Constitution or laws of the United States to U.S. citizenship 'at birth' or 'by birth,' including any child born 'in' the United States, the children of United States citizens born abroad, and those born abroad of one citizen parents who has met U.S. residency requirements," the CRS's Jack Maskell wrote. So in short: Cruz is a citizen; Cruz is not naturalized; therefore Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and in any case his mother is a citizen. You can read the CRS memo at bottom; here's a much longer and more detailed 2011 version.

~~snip~~

(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; cruz2016; elections; eligibility; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-248 next last
To: nickcarraway

LOL, post 12 didn’t mention Cruz, your song and dance routine seems to be to keep correcting people about America and American.

I just wonder how many Cruz threads are you going to use that on?


21 posted on 06/11/2014 11:50:51 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

“his mother was only living in Canada because she was working at the US Embassy there. “

The us embassy is also us soil too.....

So there is that too.


22 posted on 06/11/2014 11:52:03 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thankyou for posting this, Jim. I am so sick and tired of those dismissing Cruz! He is Reagan. He has never compromised. He stands tall and is exactly the fighter we need in 2016!


23 posted on 06/11/2014 11:55:41 PM PDT by stilloftyhenight (...staying home isn't an option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG; CyberAnt

It doesn’t look like she worked at the Embassy, but I did learn that he grew up in the same exact neighborhood as I did.

Darragh, second-youngest of 17 children, grew up in an Irish-Italian family in Wilmington, Del. She was the first in her family to go to college, graduating from Rice University with a math degree, and she worked in Houston as a computer programmer at Shell Oil.
She was independent and four years older than Rafael Cruz, who had two daughters by a previous marriage when he met Darragh. The girls spent summers with the young couple.
Ted Cruz was born three days before Christmas in 1970 in the Canadian oil town of Calgary, where his parents’ newly launched seismic-data business had taken them.
Of his days in Alberta, he remembers only cold weather. It was later he learned that when he was 3 and living there, his parents separated. Rafael Cruz returned to Houston. About six months later, Darragh followed, though they remained estranged.
Ted recalled that one day, a friend of Rafael’s invited him to Clay Road Baptist Church in the northwest Houston suburb of Spring Branch.


24 posted on 06/12/2014 12:06:24 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Most of that is a quote from this article.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/headlines/20120428-senate-candidate-ted-cruz-aims-to-pick-up-mantle-of-reagan.ece


25 posted on 06/12/2014 12:07:21 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; nickcarraway

Canada is not in America.

It is in The America’s.

No one wants to immigrate to The Americas.

Everyone wants to make it to America...

No one wants to be like The Americas

Everyone wants to be like America....

No one wants what The Americas make...

Everyone wants to wear Levis, Have a Coke and a Smile, Eat at McDonalds and enjoy our freedoms and liberty.

Mexico Does not posses American ideals.

Argentina does not possess American ideals.

Cuba does not possess American ideals.

Can-uh-Duh is America lite...Ehhh

Only the United States is America.

And only in America can a black boy grow up and become a white woman.

Baseball is an American sport.

Soccer sucks.

The NBA is American...

Being like Mike is American...

Being like Fidel is not.

The “Just Do it” spirit is uniquely American.

Canadians aren’t Americans and would be highly insulted to be called such.

Mexico is a basket case, as are it’s southern neighbors like Guatemala, Honduras and other countries.

No one wants to fight to get to Cuba or Venezuela.

Thousands of children crossed the border from Mexico to America just today.

A better life awaits you in America but, not in Haiti. That place blows....

America has Cowboys. Yippee Kye Yeah mthrfkr...Hans is dead.

The countries south of America have Vaqueros. That ain’t sexy.

America plays Cowboys and Indians(substitute any others if you care. We play that too)

America elects cowboys to be President.

America invented Texas Hold em. Not the new immigration game but, the kind of card game even James Bond Plays for big money, while enjoying an American drink; The Martini

America has a stirring and kick ass National Anthem.

America has Elvis. He rocks.

America the Beautiful, from sea to shining sea.

America saves the worlds collective ass all day long.

Heck, America will even beat someone down because we like a good fight and hate bullies.

America “The Shining City on the Hill”.

America kicked a major bully’s buttocks, twice.

America will go break things to end the argument, put your sorry azz country back together and never ask for anything in return.

America shows up whenever disaster befalls another nation. WE don’t just show up, we’re firstest and bestest.

America gives til it hurts.

America seeks not further territory but, if we help you, only a little land for fallen men.

America gave the world D-day.

The world is better for America in it.

No one wants to trade in Peso’s, Rubles or the Euro.

American green backs rule the world and every country I have ever been to loves to take our loot but, won’t take the loot of a neighboring country I just came from...weird.

The world loves America and can easily find it on a map.

If you can’t make it in America, you can’t make it anywhere...

Sure, some countries have bullfighting but, they’re sissies.

Americans ride em til we’re done...

Coming to America! Neil Diamond or Eddie Murphy...


26 posted on 06/12/2014 12:19:28 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; nickcarraway

America has Rocky with James Brown belting out “Living in America!”


27 posted on 06/12/2014 12:20:34 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

That is good enough for me.


28 posted on 06/12/2014 12:30:32 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

>>imminently qualified

He will be qualified soon?


29 posted on 06/12/2014 1:07:02 AM PDT by Lisbon1940
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

There is just one thing in this article. Mantles come from above. One doesn’t have to pick one off the floor.

Every thing this man says comes from the heart. He loves his country and it’s citizens.

He is an expert on the Constitution. A scholar. And a fighter! Cruz is the man we must unite behind. He is the only one who will undo Obama’s atrocities! No weasel words. He flat out will take no bs from the progressives. I will look forward to hearing this POTUS every single day. It’s been a long time coming.


30 posted on 06/12/2014 2:03:00 AM PDT by stilloftyhenight (...staying home isn't an option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

A birther thread? Really? What is the point of posting this here? Are you actually looking for dissent or opposing views from Constitutional Conservatives or are you just looking to ban them?


31 posted on 06/12/2014 2:35:38 AM PDT by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Go Ted go! Go Jim go! Go Sarah go! Go FR go! Rebellion is brewing! Conservatism is triumphant! Restore God to the classroom! Take America back!

Free Republic is a site for Conservative activism and not a liberal debating society as the boss has repeatedly stated. Senator Ted Cruz's eligibility for POTUS has long been a settled issue. He's 100% American and more authentically Texan than just about anyone short of Davey Crockett and Sam Houston. If it's not our Sarah taking the oath of office in January 2017, it will be Ted Cruz. Count on it.

32 posted on 06/12/2014 2:46:39 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

The trolls have been warned. Free Republic is Cruz Country.

ya think? LOL


33 posted on 06/12/2014 3:40:03 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; nickcarraway
I just wonder how many Cruz threads are you going to use that on?

How many threads you hijack and bash libertarians on for $500 , Alex

ding ding ding - Daily Double !!!

34 posted on 06/12/2014 3:45:43 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Could somebody please address this hypothetical for me?

Imagine for a moment that the year is 1815. A woman who is a U.S. citizen by birth to two other citizens travels to Great Britain, where she then weds the ruling King of Great Britain and gives birth to the King's first son.

Would that son, the heir to the British throne, then be a "natural born citizen" of the U.S. and be eligible for the Presidency?

I can't imagine a case of more questionable loyalty and yet there are those on this thread who would believe that our Founders would have no problem with this.

35 posted on 06/12/2014 4:38:13 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
The Naturalization act of 1795 accounted for that:

Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the children of persons duly naturalized, dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization; and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, or who has been legally convicted of having joined the army of Great Britain, during the late war, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, without the consent of the legislature of the state, in which such person was proscribed.

36 posted on 06/12/2014 5:18:45 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
I can't imagine a case of more questionable loyalty and yet there are those on this thread who would believe that our Founders would have no problem with this.

What gets me is no one seems to notice the double standard that the feds (and the subsequent mouthpieces for the administrative organ) are tossing out.

According to them, a child born here of foreign parents is automatically a 'citizen of the United States' at birth, but a child born to a US citizen in a foreign country is NOT a citizen of THAT country, but ALSO a citizen of the united states at birth. Talk about having your cake and eating it too!

Why don't they just go ahead and proclaim everyone in the world a citizen of the united states since the concept of national sovereignty is so meaningless to them?

37 posted on 06/12/2014 5:20:26 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xzins
xzins quotes: "The Naturalization act of 1795 accounted for that: "

It's late. Do you interpret this to mean that the heir to the throne is or is not eligible to be President as described in my hypothetical?

What you have cited is specifically a "naturalization" act of Congress and thus has no authority to lessen a Constitutional restriction.

38 posted on 06/12/2014 5:26:00 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

What I’m saying is that in the era of the revolution, that would never have happened.

Today, if you marry a princess of England, then your child will be a citizen at birth of the USA, provided you have met the residency requirements.


39 posted on 06/12/2014 5:28:46 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
It's late. Do you interpret this to mean that the heir to the throne is or is not eligible to be President as described in my hypothetical?

Clearly not: " Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons, whose fathers have never been resident in the United States..." The king was never a resident of the United States.

What you have cited is specifically a "naturalization" act of Congress and thus has no authority to lessen a Constitutional restriction.

Congress has the Constitutional power to pass uniform rules of naturalization. As part of that, wouldn't you agree would be the responsibility to identify those who don't need to be naturalized? In other words, define natural born citizens?

40 posted on 06/12/2014 5:33:52 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson