Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: Obama Looking to Act ‘Administratively, Unilaterally’ on Guns
The Blaze ^ | 6/10/14 | Fred Lucas

Posted on 06/10/2014 3:03:58 PM PDT by mykroar

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Tuesday that President BarackObama is “always” looking for opportunities to act “unilaterally” again on guns, though he would prefer to work with Congress.

“The president’s goal is to look for opportunities to act administratively, unilaterally using his executive authority to try to make our communities safer,” Earnest said, responding to a question the day that a gunman opened fire at an Oregon high school, killing one student and injuring a teacher. “We’re always looking for those opportunities. But none of those opportunities when they present themselves is going to be an acceptable substitute for robust legislative action.”

Police said the shooter at Reynolds High School in Troutdale, Oregon, was later found dead.

After the December 2012 massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, Obama took 23 executive actions to restrict guns. However, an Obama-backed bill for stronger background checks for gun purchases could not even get enough support to pass the Democratic-controlled Senate.

“There’s no doubt there has been an alarming frequency of tragic incidents of gun violence that are concerning to Democrats and Republicans in Washington but more importantly to people all across the country,” Earnest said. “The question is what can we do to make certain something like this never ever happens again? There are going to be other tragedies. The question I think really facing lawmakers right now is what common sense steps can Democrats and Republicans take to reduce the likelihood of gun violence.”

“And there are some, and they have unfortunately been bottled up in Congress and that is a disappointment to the president,” Earnest continued. “But that’s not going to stop the president from continuing to push for administrative steps that we can take to help reduce gun violence.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; confiscation; guns; molonlabe; obama; unilateral
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Diogenesis
. . . and — even then —nothing would happen.

Speak for yourself. You can come out from under the desk when we're done.

41 posted on 06/10/2014 3:57:12 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

Stop your whining. You have seen nothing yet. In a country with a hundred million gun owners, the daily death toll could be too high to even count. Be thankful 99.999999 % of us have kept our powder dry.


42 posted on 06/10/2014 3:59:49 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

they have an army. railguns, tanks, tear gas, water cannons, airplanes, drones, lasers, and a bureaucracy of a 1000 paper cuts.


43 posted on 06/10/2014 4:00:30 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I know people around here will flame you for that post. However, they are in denial. You are not.


44 posted on 06/10/2014 4:01:47 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

LOL


45 posted on 06/10/2014 4:03:36 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

Not buying it.
He doesn’t have the guts for it

On the off chance that he does something, my bet it will be symbolic rather than anything with teeth in it


46 posted on 06/10/2014 4:04:28 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

already conducting a war on ammo


47 posted on 06/10/2014 4:05:33 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Taliban, Fast and furious, VA, Benghazi)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
I know it and so do you. Tough talk is just tough talk.




48 posted on 06/10/2014 4:11:15 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

Here’s a fact: He’s going to get away with this, just like he’s gotten away with everything else. Don’t doubt it for a minute!


49 posted on 06/10/2014 4:12:18 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

He seems determined to keep undercutting his party for 2014.


50 posted on 06/10/2014 4:13:29 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot; Diogenesis
. . . and — even then —nothing would happen.

Speak for yourself. You can come out from under the desk when we're done.

In case you hadn't noticed, all the things Diogenesis said have already happened. I must have missed the revolt.

51 posted on 06/10/2014 4:16:20 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

After this Bergdahl distraction it seems to me that even if Dear Leader had the terrorists he released to dinner at the White House and invited the alphabetmedia to film them (I can’t say it) doing something horrible and gruesome in the Lincoln bedroom... even then everyone will still be waiting for someone else to act first. Perhaps you are right even then nothing would happen. I wonder if there is a way we can lock in a stop order before the next affront to our collective sensibilities is blazing across the sky?


52 posted on 06/10/2014 4:16:46 PM PDT by infool7 (The ugly truth is just a big lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mojito

You nailed it.


53 posted on 06/10/2014 4:20:25 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

There will be unilateral reaction that might be very troubling to folks unable to safely leave the White House


54 posted on 06/10/2014 4:22:07 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

I have a news flash for you. Thinking about taking everyone’s guns and taking everyone’s guns is a whole different set of variables.

What you have in the White hut is a little muzzie commie thug wannabe from Hawaii. Hawaii not really even being America. He has no clue of the real life red blooded American men and women who he will be trying to take guns from. He is in for the surprise of his miserable life.


55 posted on 06/10/2014 4:22:41 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Extremely Extreme Extremist said: "Please note that there is NEVER liberal outrage at guns when they occur in inner-cities and affect blacks."

Yes. I wonder how many people will be killed in Chicago in just the same 24 hour period as this killing in Oregon?

56 posted on 06/10/2014 4:29:36 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Bro, there are more guns in private ownership in Pennsylvania than all of the federal government.

If he moves against gun ownership he nullifies his authority of federal diktat.

He is an absolutely meaningless pest upon the republic and the people.


57 posted on 06/10/2014 4:29:47 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mykroar
Obama Looking to Act ‘Administratively, Unilaterally’ on Guns

He don't need no steenking laws.


58 posted on 06/10/2014 4:30:57 PM PDT by caveat emptor (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

Yeah and he might unilaterally get his ass thrown out of our house......


59 posted on 06/10/2014 4:33:12 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American - Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

I don’t figure he will be surprised. My husband works in a business that makes equipment for law enforcement. He has never been this busy. They have been overtime for several years now. Police and the Government are arming up big time. It scares him and the people who work there.

They know this is unlike what they have ever seen in many years.


60 posted on 06/10/2014 4:40:50 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson