Posted on 05/17/2014 6:43:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Standing on his presidential limousine, Lyndon Johnson, campaigning in Providence, R.I., in September 1964, bellowed through a bullhorn: Were in favor of a lot of things and were against mighty few. This was a synopsis of what he had said four months earlier.
Fifty years ago this Thursday, at the University of Michigan, Johnson had proposed legislating into existence a Great Society. It would end poverty and racial injustice, but that is just the beginning. It would rebuild the entire urban United States while fending off boredom and restlessness, slaking the hunger for community and enhancing the meaning of our lives all by assembling the best thought and the broadest knowledge.
In 1964, 76 percent of Americans trusted government to do the right thing just about always or most of the time; today, 19 percent do. The former number is one reason Johnson did so much; the latter is one consequence of his doing so.
Barry Goldwater, Johnsons 1964 opponent who assumed that Americans would vote to have a third president in 14 months, suffered a landslide defeat. After voters rebuked FDR in 1938 for attempting to pack the Supreme Court, Republicans and Southern Democrats prevented any liberal legislating majority in Congress until 1965. That year, however, when 68 senators and 295 representatives were Democrats, Johnson was unfettered.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Oswald was exactly what he said he was, a patsy. It is unlikely that he even fired a shot on that fateful November day.
On the day that LBJ promised to rebuild the entire urban United States,Detroit was one of the wealthiest cities on earth.Twenty trillion dollars in wealth redistribution later "wealthy" is one word that few would use to describe the city.
Johnson sounded like a complete psycho, from what I’ve read.
An explanation for liberalism:
“The instinct of submission, an ardent desire to obey and be ruled by some strong man, is at least as prominent in human psychology as the will-to-power, and politically perhaps more relevant.”
- Hannah Arendt -
"I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years."-- Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One according Ronald Kessler's Book, "Inside The White House"
I still can’t believe Johnson got away with running an ad implying that Goldwater would get us into a nuclear war.
Actually, I've never gotten over the suspicion that LBJ was somehow connected. The first thing we all thought when we heard about the assassination was, who benefits?
The following quotes are from Ronald Kesslers Inside The White House
Ill have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years. Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One
These Negroes, theyre getting pretty uppity these days and thats a problem for us since theyve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now weve got to do something about this, weve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.LBJ
Hes about 25% of the way there already.
Don’t forget the War On Poverty.
We had a great country, and the politicians simply threw it away.
“The slow decline of America since LBJ launched the Great Society”
Me thinks it has rapidly picked up speed since Jan, 2009.
“Yep! He is a nice man a good man and when he is done there will be a bunch of lazy bastards.” Said sometime in the 30’s by my fathers father.
Although there were some SCOTUS problems earlier, the atheistic Fabian Progressive Socialists began to emerge as a force around 1900. Before 1900, the federal government wasn't much of an issue in the lives of Americans. Government spending at the start of the 20th century was less than 7 percent of GDP. By the 1920's it had doubled and off we went.
The slow decline of America can be traced in the early 1900's to government's growth and easy access to our money (income tax 16th Amendment in 1913 influenced by Roosevelt who tried to pass a "progressive" income tax a few years earlier).
!
In a sense, yes. Goldwater likely would have won. Kennedy was ineffective and on the ropes. But with a dead martyr President in JFK, there was no way. It was blasphemy to vote against our young, dead, martyred President - which is what a vote for Goldwater was portrayed as by the Liberals.
It worked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.