Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources: Donald Sterling refuses NBA sanctions, threatens to sue, won't pay fine
Sports Illustrated ^ | 05/16/2014 | Michael McCann

Posted on 05/16/2014 7:35:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

SI.com has learned that Clippers owner Donald Sterling has hired prominent antitrust litigator Maxwell Blecher, who has written a letter to NBA executive vice president and general counsel Rick Buchanan threatening to sue the NBA. The letter, sources tell SI.com, claims that Sterling has done nothing wrong and that "no punishment is warranted" for Sterling. Blecher also tells Buchanan that Sterling will not pay the $2.5 million fine, which is already past due. Blecher ends the letter by saying this controversy "will be adjudicated."

Blecher's letter makes clear what many have anticipated: Donald Sterling will not go down without a fight and that he is taking active steps toward litigation. A letter of this type is considered a precursor to the filing of a lawsuit. Blecher's letter offers no ambiguity about Sterling's intentions.

"We reject your demand for payment," the letter tells Buchanan, who on May 14 informed Sterling by letter that he must pay the $2.5 million fine.

Blecher's letter goes on to identify two basic legal defenses for Sterling.

First, Blecher claims that Sterling has not violated any article of the NBA constitution. The letter curiously references Article 35, which governs players' misconduct, and several other provisions. The NBA is expected to argue that Sterling violated Article 13(d) among other provisions. Article 13 (d) bars owners from violating contractual obligations, including the obligation that owners no engage in unethical conduct or take positions adverse to the NBA. Blecher does not explain how he intends to prove Sterling's racist remarks captured on the secret recording -- followed by Sterling's incendiary remarks to Anderson Cooper about Magic Johnson -- do not give rise to unethical conduct or positions adverse to the NBA.

(Excerpt) Read more at sportsillustrated.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndthread; donaldsterling; nba; racism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last
To: SeekAndFind

The problem here is that we are fighting a just battle for freedom of speech from behind the weak media firewall of a well known racist billionaire. The left loves these kind of media spectacles because they get to further brainwash their base, score points with middle AND successfully paint the conservatives as defending a rich racist.


61 posted on 05/16/2014 9:13:00 AM PDT by Al Gore Vidal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Whatever happened to due process?

The NBA is a private organization and is not required to provide due process protections. Sterling agreed to that when he bought the team.

62 posted on 05/16/2014 9:33:07 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Give ‘em hell, Donnie!


63 posted on 05/16/2014 9:38:42 AM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
How can the NBA force out a woman owner?

MLB eventually forced Marge Schott to sell and they survived very nicely.

If the NBA owners vote to force Sterling to sell, and it's a big if, then they can argue that allowing Sterling's wife to retain half ownership is the same thing as allowing Sterling himself to remain an owner and would thus escape the penalty the NBA imposed. Since the NBA approves owners then they could deny her any part in the team.

64 posted on 05/16/2014 9:39:00 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pass the popcorn please........
This is the most I have watched the NBA for decades..
The NBA made a huge error in judgement when they thought they could use Sterling for some publicity.
Now they will get more of that then they ever wanted.....


65 posted on 05/16/2014 9:43:10 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American - Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It was a rush to judgement.


66 posted on 05/16/2014 9:44:30 AM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
If the courts find that Sterling did NOT violate the contract or league agreement then Commisioner Silver and the rest of the League Owners are going to be in quite a pickle aren't they?

The problem is that the powers vested in the Commissioner are so broadly defined that there is no way Sterling can prove that Silver exceeded his authority. The NBA Constitution says that the Commissioner can punish an owner for any actions not covered by any of the listed punishments, and which the Commissioner believes was not in the best interests of the NBA. The sole judge of that is the Commissioner himself. Silver can say that because of Sterlings actions the NBA was faced with loss of revenue, loss of the playoffs, and player dissention. And that those actions were not in the best interests of the NBA. How do you prove him wrong? You can't, so the fine and the banning will be upheld in court.

67 posted on 05/16/2014 9:47:29 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope he wins and lives to see that day.


68 posted on 05/16/2014 9:51:33 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Let’s face it, Sterling is a bigoted old fart but... what he said in the privacy of his own home was not illegal. I’d hate for anyone to hear some of the things I’ve said in privacy. I hope he wins!


69 posted on 05/16/2014 9:55:30 AM PDT by Lucky2 (Impeach the bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
If it were me in his position, I would fight back to see how far the NBA
is willing to go to destroy their brand. The NBA cannot in good faith
destroy the team. We'll see how far the NBA will go. I suspect the
bluff has been called and the NBA will try to make some kind of secret deal
that cannot be released to the MSM, in an attempt to back out of the attack.
70 posted on 05/16/2014 9:55:30 AM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

He owns a franchise, which isn’t private property.


71 posted on 05/16/2014 9:59:06 AM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Good. And I hope he takes the whole NBA down with him.


72 posted on 05/16/2014 10:11:21 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

OK. Say I own McDonald’s franchise. I say something stupid in private. I didn’t break the law. Would that give McDonald’s the right to confiscate my property and business?

I’m no fan of Sterling. I’m no fan of the Clippers. I’m no fan of basketball. But I am HUGE fan of private property rights.


73 posted on 05/16/2014 10:29:08 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

RE: Good. And I hope he takes the whole NBA down with him.

That might happen.

Already star players are threatening to boycott the game if Sterling is still around.

See here for instance:

http://deadspin.com/union-lebron-wont-play-if-sterling-still-owns-the-clip-1576242913

Union: LeBron Won’t Play If Sterling Still Owns The Clippers Next Year


74 posted on 05/16/2014 10:29:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Sounds like you know far more than I do about the ownership agreements, I’ll happily cede to your expertise on this one.


75 posted on 05/16/2014 10:30:26 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

Do your stupid thing make headlines? Was McDonalds mentioned in the headlines? Then you just devalued the corporation as a whole, which puts you in violation of your franchise agreement, which means yes they have the right to confiscate the property and business you share with them.


76 posted on 05/16/2014 10:32:23 AM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

I agree with you. There is a huge double standard


77 posted on 05/16/2014 10:36:53 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: discostu; Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

RE: He owns a franchise, which isn’t private property.

Not sure if that is accurate.

If you own a franchise, you are buying the use of a NAME ( which in a sense is WORTH the money you invest in ).

So, if you, by your actions TAINT the name of the franchise, the franchise owners have the right to DISSOCIATE their name from you.

BUT, they do not have the right to take away your SHARE of the money you put in.

So, if you put in $12 Million initially for your share of the franchise ( What Sterling put in originally over 30 years ago ), and the VALUE of the franchise is now worth 40 times your investment, I believe by law, the franchise can FORCE you not to use their name, but they cannot force you to offload your share at less than market value.

So, I believe BY LAW, the NBA can tell Sterling that he cannot use be a franchisee of the NBA ( i.e. use the NBA name for his team ). This means Sterling CAN BE PRESSURED to sell his share of the franchise. BUT ONLY AT MARKET VALUE.


78 posted on 05/16/2014 10:39:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I kept on telling everyone, just because the NBA tells you to do something, doesn’t mean he couldn’t still fight it, would not mean the NBA would necessarily win but everyone said “It’s like a franchise, if the other owners voted against him, that’s all there is to it.”


79 posted on 05/16/2014 10:39:52 AM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think the NBA Commissioner tainted it more than Sterling did, how much is his fine?

The Commissioner is going to cause the NBA to go through a big lawsuit over an illegal recording. Since the recording probably cannot be used to support their claim, it will be interesting to see the result.


80 posted on 05/16/2014 10:41:43 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson