Posted on 04/26/2014 7:47:03 PM PDT by jazusamo
INDIANAPOLIS — Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin fired up a crowd of thousands inside Lucas Oil Stadium Saturday night to kick off the National Rifle Association’s “Stand and Fight Rally,” saying Americans’ constitutional rights as envisioned by the founding fathers are under attack and policies like gun-free zones constitute “stupid on steroids.”
“They knew that if the Second Amendment goes, the rest of the constitution is not far behind,” she said of the country’s founders.
In her approximately 12-minute address, Mrs. Palin also derided what she argued is akin to a ‘blame the messenger’ attitude on gun violence many Americans take today.
“Gun stores are an accomplice to crime,” she said, “and that fork made me fat.”
Mrs. Palin, plucked from relative political obscurity to be the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee, still enjoys significant support among elements of the party’s base, and was at times received like a rock star inside the complex adjacent to the Indiana Convention Center, where much of the gun rights group’s annual meeting has taken place.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Whoa, now that's a run on sentence. Prefect in every way.
Then it's off to providing links to things he thinks are funny...
I was just pointing that you sound megalomaniacal, in a Dr Evil sort of way.
You were just pointing out, that you don't consider our nation important enough to evaluate policy and object when it's wrong.
DoughtySmurf wrote, Bluely:
So it seems rational to him to provide links to jokes...
You're linking to the joke - yourself!!!
Well every time I respond to you, I'm more or less linking to a sad pathetic joke. I guess we do agree on something after all.
DoughtyInfant wrote, Bluely:
Once again, there's one adult in the room, and on or two grade school level thinkers....
Lakeshark and I are not one person. We can, however, count you as the "on or two grade school level thinkers"
No you're not one person. And I am glad that you are able to discern that much. What I discern is that combined you two roughly evidence the equivelant of one brain between you. So whatever you count me as... enjoy.
Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Plac
Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.
So it's PROOF POSITIVE that it runs in the family. LINK
Not only that, Sarah Palin's grandmother read a news story about John McCain, when he was in Vietnam. LINK
What I discern is that combined you two roughly evidence the equivelant of one brain between you.
Is this English, or some weird dialect of Esperanto? I can't tell...
So it's PROOF POSITIVE that it runs in the family. LINK Not only that, Sarah Palin's grandmother read a news story about John McCain, when he was in Vietnam. LINK
With the seed legalizations Palin favors gifting the Left, we're talking about the potential to have 80 to 200 million new citizens in under twenty years from North, Central, and South America. The people alread in our nation from these areas vote for the Democrats in heavy numbers. It isn't as high a percentage as Blacks, but it's still very lopsided.
What we're talking about here is a solid lock on Democrat control of our nation. We already see the negative impact on our nation as it is, and it is very destructive. Should we seek to avoid having this dynamic intensified? Most Conservatives would say yes. Palin does not.
By explaining her policy in this interview, Palin tips her hand that she still favors the McCain type of plan, at least the part about Registering the illegal aliens and letting them Remain in Place. If we do this, our naiton is done.
Some of us are concerned about the policy she announces over the air on the O'Reilly program.
The time to make noise about that policy is now. This gives Palin the chance to hear our objections, understand why we object, and the chance to change her policy before the 2016 campaign season.
I do not want Palin into that campaign season with her stated immigration plan, the same way Bush went into 2000 with his amnesty plan. This is the time to make noise about a severely flawed plan.
You are not doing Palin any favors by defending her despite her policy. You would doing her more of a favor by letting her know you disagree with that plan. Instead, you try to silence me on the issue.
You go so far as to act as if the future of our nation is all one big joke to you. It's like dealing with two children, or two people who as adults don't have the tools to grasp the implications of Palin's stated plans.
Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Plac
Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.
With the seed legalizations Palin favors gifting the Left, we're talking about the potential to have 80 to 200 million new citizens in under twenty years from North, Central, and South America. The people alread in our nation from these areas vote for the Democrats in heavy numbers. It isn't as high a percentage as Blacks, but it's still very lopsided.
Well, I have to admit you're putting the pressure on me with this post, Doughty.
You posted this at nearly 9 am this morning, and now it's going on noon.
My phone's been ringing off the hook for the last hour or so.
The White House called. Sarah Palin's staff called TWICE. The UN called, Merkel's office left a text, and Putin's deputy called.
It seems everybody is up against the weekend deadline, and they've got to have me respond to your post, so's YOU can respond to me with More Important LINKS, and maybe a "new" 6-year-old O'Reilly video, wherein Sarah Palin reveals that an illegal immigrant moose bit her sister, while Sarah was eating cheese, watching, and doing NOTHING to help her.
The Palin "campaign" has to plan for 2014, and they need the latest updated Devastating Doughty Broadside, so they can cobble together an ineffectual response by midweek next week.
Oh, and the Chinese ambassador called. This stuff has apparently affected the May Day celebrations in both China and Russia, because much of their foreign relations staff have been glued to this thread, waiting for the daily updates.
Hey, guys - our apologies!
We'll try to be more punctual over the next week or two!
With the seed legalizations Palin favors gifting the Left, we're talking about the potential to have 80 to 200 million new citizens in under twenty years from North, Central, and South America. The people alread in our nation from these areas vote for the Democrats in heavy numbers. It isn't as high a percentage as Blacks, but it's still very lopsided.
Well, I have to admit you're putting the pressure on me with this post, Doughty.
You posted this at nearly 9 am this morning, and now it's going on noon.
My phone's been ringing off the hook for the last hour or so.
The White House called. Sarah Palin's staff called TWICE. The UN called, Merkel's office left a text, and Putin's deputy called.
It seems everybody is up against the weekend deadline, and they've got to have me respond to your post, so's YOU can respond to me with More Important LINKS, and maybe a "new" 6-year-old O'Reilly video, wherein Sarah Palin reveals that an illegal immigrant moose bit her sister, while Sarah was eating cheese, watching, and doing NOTHING to help her.
Yep, this is the serious response of a Palin supporter, who as of this date can't deal openly with her own stated policy.
Palin says it's her plan. You disagree with her. You don't think it is. Of course you haven't even watched what Palin had to say, but that's the whole point of my bring this up in the first place. You don't care what she has to say. You're all in, anyone who isn't has to hate her.
What do you think this forum was intended to do? Was it intended to be a place where Conservatives came and nobody else? Was it supposed to be a place where people were told who to support, and they were forbidden to ask questions or suggest some policies were a bad idea?
Your behavior on this thread is about as far removed from what the original concept was, that it's hard to believe you have participated here for more than a few weeks.
The Palin "campaign" has to plan for 2014, and they need the latest updated Devastating Doughty Broadside, so they can cobble together an ineffectual response by midweek next week.
Oh, and the Chinese ambassador called. This stuff has apparently affected the May Day celebrations in both China and Russia, because much of their foreign relations staff have been glued to this thread, waiting for the daily updates.
Hey, guys - our apologies! We'll try to be more punctual over the next week or two!
You don't know Palin's policy. You don't know that this is a place where Conservative policy is advocated. You don't know that part of the reason was to education others who might drop in here. You don't know that this is a place to debate policy, not shout others down. You don't exhibit clue one about what this forum is intended to do.
You have made a farce out of yourself since early in this exchange. You have exhibited a farcical perception of what this forum is dedicated to.
In response, you'll exhibit more of the same. Listen to Palin state her policy. Actually educate yourself on this issue..
Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.
Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.
Your behavior on this thread is about as far removed from what the original concept was, that it's hard to believe you have participated here for more than a few weeks.
I was there at the inventing of the original concept.
You're just a Palin-hating clown. You've been told many times that Palin has very recent history concerning the illegal immigration debate, yet you cling to your 4-year-old O'Really? interview like a "binky".
=================
DoughtyQueeg wrote:
You don't know Palin's policy. You don't know that this is a place where Conservative policy is advocated. You don't know that part of the reason was to education others who might drop in here. You don't know that this is a place to debate policy, not shout others down. You don't exhibit clue one about what this forum is intended to do.
I don't take instruction from obnoxious, full-of-themselves n00bs.
Your behavior on this thread is about as far removed from what the original concept was, that it's hard to believe you have participated here for more than a few weeks.
I was there at the inventing of the original concept.
You're just a Palin-hating clown. You've been told many times that Palin has very recent history concerning the illegal immigration debate, yet you cling to your 4-year-old O'Really? interview like a "binky".
Do you really think these insults mean anything to me? I address your behavior, you hurl childish insults. Not only do you not express any grasp of what this forum is about, you betray yourself and the person you say you support more with each post. You don't know you're supposed to link in the person you're talking about. Most of the folks who have been here for a long time, are aware of that. You say that you are not.
"Binky?" Really? And you have been told of her pubic statement, and as of yet are unable to come up with any instance of her addressing Registraton and Remaining in Place since 2010. That being the case, her last public comments on it causes this issue to be germane, whether you can grasp it or not.
=================
DoughtyQueeg wrote:
You don't know Palin's policy. You don't know that this is a place where Conservative policy is advocated. You don't know that part of the reason was to education others who might drop in here. You don't know that this is a place to debate policy, not shout others down. You don't exhibit clue one about what this forum is intended to do.I don't take instruction from obnoxious, full-of-themselves n00bs.
And we can add to the list of things you can't comprehend about this forum, what the term noob stands for.
I've been her for over sixteen years now. Noob?
Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.
Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.
Sheesh, I go away, and now you've done it. Here I am minding my own business, preparing coffee, and you should see my monitor now......
Damn you sir, damn you to Hell...../s
Seriously though, there is a HUGE MENTAL PROBLEM with the person we're making fun of, THE ERSTWHILE SUPERHERO (in his own mind) : The Blue Ink Stain. He's either fully delusional (eunachal), or bordering on genuinely evil (soulless animal), or, as I would vote him, a poor mongrel combination of both.
1. He claims his interviews LINK prove some kind of policy favoring unbridled illegal immigration and amnesty. If you actually go to the interviews, NO ONE BUT HIM, can actually discern a policy, and can't tell what she believes.
2. The first three interviews are, wait for this, six years ago while she's doing the job of defending someone else's policy as she's running for veep. It's also clear from the interviews her own opinion is we shouldn't deliver amnesty, plus we have to fix the borders to stop this nonsense.
3. The fourth interview is Chris Matthews interrupting her in 2010 (wait, wait, maybe that's someone else), which is four years ago. In this interview, once again she reiterates that WE HAVE TO SHUT DOWN THE BORDER, and, WE CAN'T GIVE AMNESTY TO ILLEGALS!.
Now, any sane person might want to say, there is no discernible policy here in these interviews, no way to genuinely get to the heart of her beliefs, but one thing for sure, she doesn't want to grant amnesty, and she wants to control the border.
Oh....but The Blue Ink Stain , he knows better. He KNOWS what this means, after all, she says "registration", therefore she must be a closeted full throated leftist who wants to throw our borders open, give amnesty, and give the dems a permanent majority. HE KNOW THIS TO BE TRUE, because, after all....he is.....The Blue Ink Stain!!!
Seriously, how unhinged do you have to be to actually make that kind of leap. LINK
We've pointed out her pronouncements of the past years and her actions have been diametrically opposed to his blue delusional beliefs since then over and over again, yet he persists in showing off his foolish blue skirts.
1. She came out full broadside multiple times against the dream act.
2. She's on record saying both Rubio and Ayotte should be primaried for their support of amnesty and the ensuing chaos of open borders.
3. She's actually asked Rubio is he's proud of collecting his pieces of silver for his support of illegals, a pretty harsh take down.
4. She's the ONLY conservative who fully backed Arizona's attempts to enforce existing immigration law.
5. She's the ONLY conservative to actually go to Arizona to show support for the governor on this action.
6. She's had several other pronouncements about the GOPE's idiocy in their attempts to deliver amnesty.
7. Her most recent take down of Jeb Bush's nonsense about "acts of love" and reminding us that it's ILLEGAL to cross our borders and wrong to take American jobs was classic.
So...here we are: You can follow The Blue Ink Stain's delusional private beliefs about her "policies". Or: You can have some common sense and realize that She's one of the bright lights in fighting illegal immigration, that she genuinely wants to control the borders, and that she genuinely hates the idea of amnesty.
Your choice.
I've been her for over sixteen years now.
Talk about your REVEALING Freudian slip...
I've been hating her for over sixteen years now.
Hey, don't laugh, it's as plausible as his pet theory of her being pro-amnesty and pro-illegal....:-)
...but you haven't been able to provide anything that addresses the issue at hand
When I was reading some of DoughtyQueeg's earlier comments lecturing me about how the forum runs, and how "ignorant" I am of normal forum protocol, I had to suppress a belly laugh.
The issue at hand on this thread is Sarah Palin's comments to kick off the National Rifle Association’s “Stand and Fight Rally”. She discussed our constitutional rights as envisioned by the founding fathers as being under attack, and she said that if “[she was] in charge, they would know that waterboarding is how we baptize terrorists.”
So, Gollum, the obnoxious n00b Smurf, basically hijacked this thread to talk about his perception of Palin's 6-year-old comments on "illegal immigration". The thread is not about that. I just kind of let him chatter along for 450 plus posts, making a fool of himself.
The capper for his obsessive Palin-bashing was the "lectures" on "FR protocol" in his recent posts.
What a maroon! What a dweeb! What a tool! LOL! :)
I saw it on O'Really. LOL! :)
You have to love the little foot-stomping hissy-fits he throws to try to make the Palin "water-boarding terrorists" thread into a Palin "6-year-old illegal immigration comments" thread.
The Merkel text from yesterday actually read: "Was meint das Blauen Dummkopf, "illegal immigration"? Wo ist der "Terror", und das "simuliertes Ertrinken"?
I had to message back:
"Ich weiß nicht - und er weiß night, auch..."
Talk about embarrassing - für ihn...
And once again Palin's plane to Register and allow illegal aliens
Dude - she sold the plane when she was governor of Alaska.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.