DOWN TO BUSINESS: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch announce their re-election campaigns Tuesday.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Posted on 04/16/2014 8:00:32 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
Literally minutes after Gov. Scott Walker and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch officially announced their re-election campaign Tuesday, a Hillary Clinton front group rolled out its attack machine against the Republican governor and potential 2016 presidential hopeful.
American Bridge, backed by big-money liberal donor George Soros, “welcomed” Walker and his “failed job creation promise to the Wisconsin governor’s race.”
The liberal “research and communications organization committed to holding Republicans accountable for their words” by employing liberal spin, made its first sortie an all-out assault on Walker’s jobs record, criticizing the governor’s failure to date to hit his ambitious pledge that the state would create 250,000 jobs by the end of his first term.
Walker’s official campaign launch made one thing very clear: The political war is back on in Wisconsin.
And liberals again are ready to pump in big money and national resources to take down the man who reformed Wisconsin’s public-sector collective bargaining system, among one of the most active public policy reform agendas since the progressives “Fighting” Bob LaFollette.
Walker is fighting back, answering the question Ronald Reagan asked an economically fatigued nation in 1980.
“We’re better off than we were four years ago, but there is more work to be done,” the governor said in his announcement. The tax-cutting governor chose Tax Day to officially jump into the race.
“In the past, April 15 was a day we didn’t have much to look forward to in Wisconsin. But this year, we have hope for the future. This is a new beginning for our state. Wisconsin is back on, and our best days are ahead of us,” Walker said.
In three-plus years, the iconoclastic governor has not presided over a state economy that has created 250,000 jobs. He has, to date, missed his mark.
But the incumbent brings to his re-election bid an impressive resume of accomplishments, including an economy that has added more than 100,000 jobs after the worst recession to Wisconsin and the nation in a generation. With that, Walker can — and does — point to the addition of thousands of new businesses starting up on his watch.
The reason for that business boom, conservatives assert, is Walker and the Republican majority pushing for regulatory and tax reforms that have changed the attitude of business, long burdened with some of the highest tax rates and regulations in the country.
While his opponents have protested his state budget reforms, Walker can lay claim to filling a massive $3.6-billion budget hole that he and his fellow Republicans inherited from the man he replaced, Democrat Gov. Jim Doyle and the ruling Democrats in the state Legislature. Wisconsin lost more than 130,000 jobs in the Great Recession, on Doyle’s watch, and thousands of businesses shut down.
Walker and his supporters have said Wisconsin wasn’t going to dig itself out of the deep economic hole overnight, just as President Obama and his backers have said of the slowly recovering U.S. economy. But to Walker’s vitriol-spewing opponents, there’s a difference between Wisconsin’s plodding recovery and the nation’s oft-anemic growth.
Look for that double-standard to be richly applied by the left in the months ahead.
But it is hard to dispute the roaring return of strong state revenue at the state level. Walker and the Republicans have presided over a budget running $900 million ahead of expectation, and he has signed GOP-led legislation amounting to some $2 billion in tax relief, including $750 million in income tax cuts and $500 million in property tax reductions.
“Since taking office, we made the tough decisions past leaders chose to ignore, and they are paying off for the people of Wisconsin,” Walker said in his campaign announcement.
But the left, which paints Walker’s signature Act 10 as gutting Wisconsin’s government collective-bargaining system, plans to put a lot of skin in this game.
Michael Podhorzer, political director of the AFL-CIO, in February said the nation’s labor unions look to spend at least $300 million going after Republicans in this fall’s elections.
Much of that spending is expected to be dropped on four industrial battlegrounds — Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, traditional union strongholds. Big labor also wants Florida.
Of greater interest, perhaps, are states such as Wisconsin, which features a very viable and, to the left, threatening presidential candidate in Walker.
“It’s about survival,” Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and chairman of the AFL-CIO’s political committee, told the New York Times.
“What’s happened didn’t just hurt public-sector unions, it hurt the entire labor movement,” Saunders said of Walker’s law that rolled back the power of public-sector unions in Wisconsin.
But Walker and his lieutenant governor are battle-tested. They survived a furious recall challenge in 2012, led by big labor and the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, with a lot of national money in the mix.
Walker’s main challenger is Madison millionaire liberal Mary Burke, basically anointed by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin. Burke, a former Trek Bicycle executive, secretary of commerce under Doyle and a member of the ultra-liberal Madison Metropolitan School Board, has plenty of campaign vulnerabilities. Her biggest problem now is that relatively few voters know who she is.
Wisconsin is well-acquainted with Walker. Voters, for the most part, either love him or hate him.
The latest Marquette University Law School poll showed Walker’s favorability rating remained at 49 percent, and he was seen as unfavorable by 47 percent of respondents.
Not so much for Burke, who was viewed favorably by 19 percent and unfavorably by 22 percent of the poll’s respondents. The majority of those polled have little or no idea who the Democrat candidate is.
Burke was running 7 percentage points behind Walker in the Marquette poll, conducted in March. The poll of 801 Wisconsin registered voters was conducted by cell phone and landline March 20-23, and it had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percent.
Burke lags farther behind in a recent St. Norbert College poll, which found Walker up 55 percent to Burke’s 40 percent. The poll, of 400 Wisconsin residents, had a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percent.
John McAdams, political science professor at Marquette University, said Burke needs to get known fast or she could face an exodus of money.
“That was the complaint from Barrett’s people, that the national people weren’t backing him,” McAdams said of Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, who ran unsuccessfully against Walker in the recall campaign. “What they were doing was looking at their internal polls and the public polls and saying, ‘This is not a good use of our money.’”
You can count on Walker’s backers introducing Burke and her political record to Wisconsin voters in the coming months, and she will be connected to Doyle’s troubles.
“Four years ago, the debate in Madison revolved around the size of tax increases, but now we’re discussing tax cuts and government reform,” said Brad Courtney, chairman of the Republican Party of Wisconsin, in a statement Tuesday. “We’ve come a long way, but we still have so much more to do.”
DOWN TO BUSINESS: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch announce their re-election campaigns Tuesday.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Woohoo! The polling places will be swamped again this fall!
Walker is massively pro-amnesty.
I think Scott Walker may indeed be a dark horse for the Republican presidential nomination.
There will be a huge line-up of contenders, but Walker could come from behind to surprise us.
And you know this, how?
The Marxists NEVER will give up. Be prepared for this sort of attack and battle for as long as the Republic stands.
Steve Israel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said the party remained confident its nominee could win Young’s former seat in November. It was not immediately clear who that candidate would be.
“Walker is massively pro-amnesty.”
What a lie that is.
That was something WaPo churned out to damage Walker.
Walker:
“I’ve not said there should be amnesty in this country. I don’t believe that. I don’t support the legislation being
kicked around. What I’ve said repeatedly is we need to fix the immigration system, but fix the legal system. So
if people want to come in this country we should have a legal immigration system.”
Bannon then interjected: “And take care of the borders and everything we have to do first.”
Walker concurred, saying that any immigration reform efforts should “fix the front door.”
“If you’re somebody, whether you’re from Mexico or Germany or Ireland, and you want to come to this country
legally, we should find a way to make it happen,” Walker said.
Walker’s comments come months after, in July, the Post’s Blake ran a blaring headline saying Walker “backs path to citizenship.”
Walker did not back a pathway to citizenship, as he clearly laid out in his interview with Bannon. At the time, he
was presented with a purely hypothetical situation. In laying out his stance back then, something that mainstream
media reporters missed, Walker noted that the federal government tends to take a “band-aid approach” to reform
of issues, rather than his gubernatorial-style handling of real reform aimed at actually fixing the problem.
“It’s why I’m not a big fan of a lot of things in the federal government, regardless of party,” Walker said.
“Not that we’re perfect at the state [level], but you can get your hands around issues like that at the state.
Just the mere fact they’re having that debate without having a discussion about why is the system itself—
why aren’t we fixing that? It just seems to be kind of the vacuum that decisions are made in at the federal level.”
Guess 9Year doesn’t know how Walker is massively pro-amnesty.
I don’t believe it myself, but I will look into it.
No he's not and you only have some little article from the Hill that says so. Produce some mainstream news source for your assertion or let everyone see it as false. He is no more pro-amnesty than Ted Cruz or others
Everyone this is a falsehood that can not be proven.
That’s news to me. Can you give me an example or two?
They never give up and their financial backers, regressives like George Soros and Nanny Bloomberg make sure there is plenty of money to keep the angry leftists employed and fighting REAL progress.
If the RATS plan to run against Walker on a platform of giving power back to public sector unions, they will be crushed at the polls.
Even in liberals states, the taxpaying voters are smart enough to hate public unions!
Thank you for that Februus. You refuted that point better than anyone I’ve seen.
Maybe Wendy Davis will endorse Burke..
You said:
Walker is massively pro-amnesty.
____________________________________________________
It just isn’t so, here are Walkers own words:
“See now that’s where they take it out of context,” Walker said in response. “I’ve not said there should be amnesty in this country. I don’t believe that. I don’t support the legislation being kicked around. What I’ve said repeatedly is we need to fix the immigration system, but fix the legal system. So if people want to come in this country we should have a legal immigration system.”
Bannon then interjected: “And take care of the borders and everything we have to do first.”
Walker concurred, saying that any immigration reform efforts should “fix the front door.”
“If you’re somebody, whether you’re from Mexico or Germany or Ireland, and you want to come to this country legally, we should find a way to make it happen,” Walker said.
________________________
I think that is likely what most people in this country would say.
Thanks for the info.
This is even worse, essentially an open borders policy:
““If you’re somebody, whether you’re from Mexico or Germany or Ireland, and you want to come to this country
legally, we should find a way to make it happen,” Walker said.”
But here’s the start of article from The Hill that quotes Walker as, despite his claims (and all pols claim to be against ‘amnesty’), massively pro-amnesty:
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) says he supports a pathway to citizenship for immigrants living in the country illegally as part of an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system.
“If people want to come here and work hard and benefit, I don’t care whether they come from Mexico or Ireland or Germany or Canada or South Africa or anywhere else,” Walker said Tuesday during an interview with the Daily Herald Media Editorial Board of Wisconsin. “I want them here.”
Walker was then asked about the estimated 11 million immigrants living in the country illegally. The editorial board asked if he could “envision a world where with the right penalties and waiting periods and meet the requirements where those people could get citizenship?”
“Sure,” Walker responded. “I mean I think it makes sense.”
The Hill is a credible source.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.