That job is already being performed.
They’re called ‘trees.’
You're right. Also, if conservatives thought this was a real issue - which we don't - we would also suggest planting more trees in mall parking lots etc as a way of stopping the creation of weird heat sink micro climates around large cities.
Yep, as hundreds of high school experiments have proven time and again, plants grow quicker in a high CO2 environment.
In commercial greenhouses C02 machines are used to accelerate growth in young plants. As the plants mature the C02 production is cut back because they don't consume and process as much.
Forests work the same way. Young trees planted after a timber harvest are active and eat air like teenagers eat pizza.
SOOOO - ain't it funny that the liberal nutballs that want to kill the timber industry are worried about C02?
Well hey - these are the same folks that rant and rant about clean and renewal energy and lobby congress to tear out hydroelectric dams.
The thing that confuses me is how anyone can take these batshit crazy people seriously!
Beat me to it
We have carbonsuckers....... trees.
Not only that but if you drive much in the South you see lots and lots of them ....... forests. The forests that replace what was once cropland are not real old, perhaps 50 years or less.
I’m not talking about the mountains and National Forests but private land. There are square miles of it.
As the farmlands transition from fields and pastures, the climax forests develop and with them increasing populations of wild life that are adapting to the new habitat.
The problem is the moonbats are city bound and have no clue to life beyond their isolated urban habitat.