Posted on 04/02/2014 12:22:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Democratic lawmakers and campaign finance reform advocates quickly bashed Wednesday’s Supreme Court decision to strike down total limits on individual campaign contributions, warning of future corruption in elections.
Meanwhile, Republicans largely cheered the ruling from the narrowly divided court, which found it unconstitutional to impose caps on the aggregate amounts that one person can donate to campaigns, parties and political action committees.
Calling himself “all for freedom,” Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Wednesday commended the ruling, saying “donors ought to have the freedom to give what they want to give.” And Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who had filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, also praised the decision.
“Let me be clear for all those who would criticize the decision: It does not permit one more dime to be given to an individual candidate or a party,” McConnell said Wednesday. “It just respects the constitutional rights of individuals to decide how many to support.” Senate Democrats, who control the chamber, are already planning to respond. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said he will hold a hearing on the impact of the McCutcheon decision and other rulings from the high court that he says “have eviscerated our campaign finance laws.”
Meanwhile, Maine Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said he introduced legislation intended to make donations more transparent by requiring all contributions of $1,000 or more to be disclosed to the Federal Election Commission within 48 hours. A campaign bill in the House will be introduced by Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas).
“This in itself is a small step, but another step on the road to ruination,” said New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, the third-ranking Democrat. “It could lead to interpretations of the law that would result in the end of any fairness in the political system as we know it.”
Responding to the decision, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) invoked his favorite boogeymen: the Koch brothers.
“The Supreme Court today just accentuated what they did on Citizens United, which is a decision that is one of the worst decisions in the history of that court,” Reid said during a press conference on raising the minimum wage. “All it does is take away people’s rights because, as you know, the Koch brothers are trying to buy America.”
Over in the House, Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) said he plans to introduce legislation that will “fully reverse this latest Supreme Court blunder.” And House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called for passage of legislation sponsored by Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.) that is meant to amplify small-dollars donations to congressional candidates.
“Our founders risked their lives, their liberty and their sacred honor to create a democracy — a government of the many, not a government of the money,” Pelosi said in a statement. “After misguided and destructive court decisions in McCutcheon and Citizens United, it is clear that Congress must act swiftly to restore fairness to our campaign finance system.”
Current federal law limits the total amount an individual can give to $48,600 for candidates and $74,600 in contributions to PACs and party committees in each two-year cycle. That’s separate from the $2,600 limit on donations to a single candidate and the $32,400 cap on donations to parties.
While Democrats publicly criticized the decision, they were far more positive in private. One top Hill Democrat suggested Democrats had a larger number of donors, and they can now go back and ask these supporters for even more money.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the author of the landmark 2002 McCain-Feingold law that clamped down on soft-money contributions, said he was “disappointed” by Wednesday’s ruling — calling it the latest move from justices to “dismantle entirely the longstanding structure of campaign finance law.”
“I predict that as a result of recent court decisions, there will be scandals involving corrupt public officials and unlimited, anonymous campaign contributions that will force the system to be reformed once again,” McCain said. Burgess Everett, Jake Sherman and John Bresnahan contributed to this report.
“I predict that as a result of recent court decisions, there will be scandals involving corrupt public officials and unlimited, anonymous campaign contributions that will force the system to be reformed once again,” McCain said.
Yep, the Keating Five comes to mind.
This will be the reason why Dems lose in Nov 2014 in spite of Obamacare being a roaring success,
7 mill served !
If this was a democracy people like Pelosi would have been strung up years ago.
I hope the Koch brothers double down on Harry Reid.
This is why Hobby Lobby will win their case.
McCain and Reid on the same side. Glad nothing changed during my nap
Meanwhile Dingy Harry will reap $100 million from the Steyers Brothers who want to kill the Keystone Pipeline and make billions. They own the dirtiest coal plant in Indonesia.
Reid is jealous of Makers, being a Stealer hisself.
Hey Harry - we’ll see you a Soros and raise you a Koch brother.
While Democrats publicly criticized the decision, they were far more positive in private. One top Hill Democrat suggested Democrats had a larger number of donors, and they can now go back and ask these supporters for even more money.
The Koch brothers are living rent free in the Rats heads.
"Show me the jewelry", Harry.
Invented history? Two can play that game:
"The Democrats risked their lives, their liberty and their sacred honor to create the Ku Klux Klan — a government of the Southern racists. They never disbanded, but now occupy the big cities, where they keep their black slaves in the chains of crime, drugs and the EBT card."
If Harry Reid hates it, it must be a good thing.
The Democrats won’t be able to gain much from this ruling, since they don’t follow the current campaign-finance rules anyway.
Liberal Republicans won’t gain much either since most of their money comes from corporations.
But principled Conservatives will benefit because, being principled, they will stick together and share their local contributor lists with other Conservatives in other districts and states. And the Conservative SarahPAC will be able to take in more funds from small donors to compete more fairly with Karl Rove’s RINO organization of big fat-cat contributors.
Reid sounds like a deranged wino.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.