OK Sacajaweau, I’m going full Bourne.
Day before yesterday The Precedent made a remark about a nuke in Manhattan that startled some in the media by the remark’s apparent off the wall nature. (Why would he say such a thing they asked) Why indeed?
Was he letting the perpetrators know that by telegraphing that he knew there was a suitcase device aboard MH370? Did CIA or MI-5 know it was there and that it had to be buried in the Indian Ocean in very deep water. So was it CIA or MI-5 that took over the cockpit remotely or physically to save Manhattan or Beijing? Not a conspiracy theory mind you just a though; a random spark of an alcohol tempered ganglion.
I have to go back and find something else I read to connect a dot. I'll be back.
That whole nuke in Manhattan thing was because the heads of state were playing a video simulation of a nuclear terrorism attack. I don’t have a link but it was all over FR a few days ago. I think he was impressed by his own performance such that he actually thought he should be worried. Otherwise he might have just pulled it out of the air because it was so fresh in his mind. Nothing sinister there I’m afraid.
LOL! I wonder why that makes me feel deja vu.
It was mention earlier that a 777 had set a world record from Seattle to airport they took off from back a few years. The question was raise if the pilot was part of he crew. His “democracy is dead” t shirt may have been an indication of wanting democracy in his homeland. Could he have been used as an agent?
Cue the Missiin Impossible music!