Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Professor Wants Climate Change “Deniers” Thrown in Jail
Townhall.com ^ | March 16, 2014 | Michael Schaus

Posted on 03/16/2014 9:49:07 AM PDT by Kaslin

An assistant philosophy professor at Rochester Institute of Technology has proposed a bold plan to settle the debate on Global Warming. Lawrence Torcello wrote an essay suggesting that scientists who fail to fall in line with global warming alarmists should be charged with criminal negligence, and possibly even be thrown in jail. Nothing screams academic freedom like a little intellectual Fascism. Right?

When it comes to global warming, much of the public remains in denial about a set of facts that the majority of scientists clearly agree on.

Well, Larry (can we call him Larry?), it might surprise you – an assistant professor of philosophy – to learn that science is not a democratic study. Skepticism, opposition, and deviation from the adopted narrative are more responsible for scientific discovery than blind allegiance to any prevailing theory. And, quite frankly, the theory of anthropogenic global warming has been delegitimized by some of its greatest proponents… Most scientists would agree that it becomes increasingly difficult to believe in a theory that has routinely failed to produce any moderately accurate models or predictions. But, of course it gets better:

With such high stakes, an organized campaign funding misinformation ought to be considered criminally negligent.

Laughably, Larry is not talking about East Anglia, Al Gore, or the UN Climate Change Scandal (where a number of scientists were quoted out of context to give the impression of a consensus view on climate change). In fact, while Larry alleges that “deniers” (apparently the word “skeptic” doesn’t have the right amount of stigma attached to it) are engaged in a misinformation campaign, he never once defends the propagandistic efforts of the global-warming-faithful.

Governments, activist groups, well connected CEOs, and elite billionaire Liberals have pushed trillions of dollars into the propagation of global warming fears. And yet, strangely, this assistant philosophy professor seems incapable unwilling to see the irony of his allegations. But, wait… He soon goes for the jugular:

We have good reason to consider the funding of climate denial to be criminally and morally negligent. The charge of criminal and moral negligence ought to extend to all activities of the climate deniers who receive funding as part of a sustained campaign to undermine the public’s understanding of scientific consensus.

Ah… So scientists who dare to question the provably wrong predictions of melted ice caps, winterless years, and raising sea levels should be charged with negligence for “undermining the public’s understanding of scientific consensus”? Well, here’s some scientific consensus for you, Larry:

The world has not seen a measurable increase in temperatures for over 15 years. Arctic ice has increased in mass since 2013. The “Polar Vortex” is part of a broader, and predictable, weather shift that has been happening for thousands of years. “Climate Change” has been occurring, without man-made forces, for every single one of the billions of years this rock has been spinning around the sun.

But, let’s be honest: Larry isn’t really worried about the science (even though I’m sure his studies in philosophy have yielded him great insights into climatology, atmospheric science, and meteorological changes throughout history). He’s worried about opposition to his beliefs. He even acknowledges some of the pushback that his idea might receive:

My argument probably raises an understandable, if misguided, concern regarding free speech.

Misguided? The Left’s intolerance, it seems, has no bounds. A student from Harvard recently argued against academic freedom. Not wanting to be outdone, this assistant professor is now suggesting that political opponents (or for that matter, scientists who don’t tow his ideological ideals) be criminally charged. It is almost stunning how easily the Left will adopt the notion of censorship and intellectual fascism to limit their opposition.

For being an assistant professor of philosophy, Torcello seems stunningly married to an egocentric world view. People who disagree with him, in his mind, are not merely “wrong”… They’re crossing the threshold into criminality. This is a point of view that is growing among the Left. Opponents to the President are racist. Opponents of Nancy Pelosi are sexist. Advocates for traditional marriage are bigots. And, apparently, opponents to the theory of anthropogenic global warming are worthy of a little jail time. This doesn’t seem like positions that lend themselves to any degree of philosophical integrity.

If Larry really wants to help fight global warming, he should keep his totalitarian mouth shut… Currently, he’s spewing too much hot air into the atmosphere.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: envirowhackos; globalwarming; greenpolice; leftismoncampus; liberalfascism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Kaslin
The Church of Climate Change (formerly The Church of Global Warming, formerly The Church of Global Cooling) is really no different that the early European Church, which outlawed the teaching and writings of Copernicus, Galileo, and Divinci. It will allow NOTHING that differs with official "church doctrine."

And just like way back then, The Church worked to enrich itself, and keep the people "in darkness." In this case, they really DO want to turn out the lights (and electricity).

One of the reasons that Gore has become so unhinged was that he was slated to become the world's first "Global Warming" billionaire with the passage of cap and trade.

Mark

61 posted on 03/16/2014 11:18:09 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The one good thing about liberalism... it is ALWAYS wrong.

So if you want to know what to do, or what will happen. Just find out what liberal want you to do or think will happen and do the opposite or plan for the opposite.

For instance I became 100% convinced that we were heading into a new ice age the minute liberals started pushing global warming.


62 posted on 03/16/2014 11:18:47 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Well Larry,if CW2 starts-I’ll look for you on the field.


63 posted on 03/16/2014 11:21:31 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

What a doofus,too lazy to even shave properly.


64 posted on 03/16/2014 11:25:10 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Dr. Larry is going to opine on the philosophy of science, he should at least read the seminal work on that matter, namely “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” by Thomas Kuhn.

BTW, Dr. Larry, they locked up Galileo for denying what the 99% “consensus” of existing “scientists” had to say about the fundamental “settled science” of astronomy, but the earth continued to rotate around the sun anyway.

BTW, a few of the other scientists who correctly bucked the 99% consensus were, Louis Pasteur, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Alfred Wegener, Antoine Lavoisier, and Robin Warren and Barry J. Marshall. Fortunately, Dr. Larry wasn’t in charge of jailing scientific heretics during those times, or otherwise we would be living in a far different and a far poorer world than today.


65 posted on 03/16/2014 11:37:30 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just Leftists being their normal fascist selves. Politics trumps science like everything else


66 posted on 03/16/2014 11:40:07 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

:-) snicker


67 posted on 03/16/2014 11:43:47 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
Hey...I can beat this Torcello guy. Hold m' beer and watch this.

Milton Miteybad: "Society should have the option to execute those who are stupid enough to subscribe to a belief in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration ("CACA", for short.)

Let's see him top that. (Heh, heh...heh, heh...)
68 posted on 03/16/2014 11:45:37 AM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
"You shall not disagree! :-)"

Great ironic message there. And yes, Torcello is a fascist. That's how the underlings of boss political constituents continue to get paid.

They claim to want lower pollution emissions. Give 'em what they're asking for, save money, become more self-sufficient and starve the beast. Here are some examples. There are also many ways to save for southern folks needing to cool off.

$2K Solar Space + Water Heating — One Simple DIY System
http://www.builditsolar.com/Projects/SpaceHeating/DHWplusSpace/Main.htm

Stealthy and very low cost without requiring much wood.

rocket stove mass heater
http://www.richsoil.com/rocket-stove-mass-heater.jsp

Some techs. are working on developing related, low cost stoves with mass and masonry heaters for those who need to pass inspections.

There are many modifications for the above and many more kinds of projects in the works. Sometimes, we should acknowledge a negative and ongoing political and economic reality and choose to adapt and overcome.

Look at this oven (dowload the manual).

On "cooling off," one Freeper painted his house with a special reflective paint, superinsulated the house and continued with other related projects. Sorry I haven't had time to do more study and experimentation for hot climates. It very seldom gets above 65 degrees here (but often lower than 30 below).

The more influential political folks want to start playing the "carbon" game. Make them pay us, instead (see Linux, open source legal successes).

We don't play with camping toys. We're not Walter Mitty. We don't mess around. Sanctions first.


69 posted on 03/16/2014 11:47:57 AM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Thought police.
Department of pre-crime.
70 posted on 03/16/2014 12:08:11 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Michael Crichton on “science” and “consensus”:

http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/Crichton2003.pdf

(hint: he said they don’t play well together)


71 posted on 03/16/2014 12:16:32 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Ah, on Walter Mitty... For those who haven’t read it, it’s an enjoyable and very short short story.

Fiction
The Secret Life of Walter Mitty
by James Thurber
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1939/03/18/390318fi_fiction_thurber?currentPage=all


72 posted on 03/16/2014 12:18:55 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“The left would LOVE to be able to imprison anyone who disagreed with them.”

That’s where it always leads. Demonize then criminalize the opposition. Then come the re-education camps, then the death camps.


73 posted on 03/16/2014 12:31:13 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

“is an “assistant professor of philosophy” considered to be a scientist? A climate scientist?”

It must be nice to be an Ass. Prof of Philosophy. Everything is just a matter of opinion. No right or wrong, no need to prove your point. Just run your mouth all day, write your BS opinions and get paid. Its like being a journalist, use your “freedom of speech” to say whatever BS you want while advocating the elimination of free speech for others.


74 posted on 03/16/2014 12:43:39 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Larry Torella

My research interests include ethical theory, and applied ethics, social and political philosophy, and scientific skepticism. Current projects investigate the practical consequences and ethical responsibilities implicit to democratic citizenship in morally pluralistic societies, particularly in the domains of medicine and education, the environment and animal welfare, public policy and political discourse. My recent work pursues the moral implications of global warming denialism, as well as other forms of science denialism.


75 posted on 03/16/2014 12:48:03 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

It is said that mathematicians require pencil, paper and a trashcan. Philosophers dispense with the trash can.


76 posted on 03/16/2014 12:49:56 PM PDT by Mycroft Holmes (<= Mash name for HTML Xampp PHP C JavaScript primer. Programming for everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

“denialism”. Learn a new word each day. You must have also noted that among this clown’s research interests is “scientific skepticism”, something that he himself does not appear to practice.


77 posted on 03/16/2014 12:50:56 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious! We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

On 13 March 2014, Assistant Professor Lawrence Torcello published a blog posting[1] entitled Is misinformation about the climate criminally negligent? at a tendentious propaganda website, “The Conversation”. In that posting, he committed the following breaches of the Institute’s policies:

1. Mr Torcello describes himself as “Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Rochester Institute of Technology” and makes no effort to comply with the explicit requirement of the principles on academic freedom by indicating that he writes neither on behalf of the Institute nor in his capacity as an assistant professor there but as a private citizen.

2. Mr Torcello offends against the requirement of accuracy stated in the principles of academic freedom in that his posting falsely said “the majority of scientists clearly agree on a set of facts” about “global warming” on which they do not in fact agree. Mr Torcello links his cited statement to a reference to three papers each claiming a “97% consensus” to the effect that most of the global warming observed since 1950 was manmade. However, as Legates et al. (2013)[2] have demonstrated, a review of 11,944 papers on climate published in the 21 years 1991-2011, the largest such review ever published in the scientific literature, had marked only 64 papers, or 0.5% of the sample, as explicitly endorsing that proposition. Though it may well be that 100% of scientists publishing in relevant fields accept that – all other things being equal – our returning CO2 to the atmosphere from which it once came will be likely to cause some global warming (though the record amounts of CO2 we have emitted recently have not caused any warming at all for up to 17 years 6 months[3]), legitimate scientific doubt remains about the quantum of future global warming that may be expected, with an increasing body of peer-reviewed papers moving towards a climate sensitivity of only 1-2 Celisus degrees per CO2 doubling[4], and the IPCC itself drastically reducing its predictions of global warming over the next 30 years.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/03/14/moncktons-letter-to-rochester-institute-of-technology-regarding-assistant-professor-lawrence-torcello/


78 posted on 03/16/2014 12:51:27 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mycroft Holmes

There should be a nice stay in the artic for him...a vacation of sorts.


79 posted on 03/16/2014 12:52:53 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He fits right in with the draconian pre-enlightenment approach to science. At the time it was settled that the earth was flat and anyone daring to say differently were punished by the Noble class.....


80 posted on 03/16/2014 1:10:56 PM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson