Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prostituting Science
American Thinker ^ | February 10, 2014 | Russ Vaughn

Posted on 02/11/2014 12:59:13 AM PST by neverdem

Over at Forbes, Patrick Michaels, Director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute and a senior fellow in research and economic development at George Mason University, has written a serious and thought-provoking piece regarding the deleterious impact of the fraud of global warming on the world scientific community. Michaels, citing an article in the Australian literary journal, Quadrant, by Garth Paltridge, whom Michaels characterizes as one of the world's most respected atmospheric scientists, posits a harsh view of the inevitable and devastating impact of the current climate change hysteria on future scientific research.

For those of us who have smelled a rat since the outset of this latest "sky is falling" phenomenon, there's little in the article to surprise us and a whole lot of material to support "I told ya so's." As we Deniers long suspected, Paltridge and Michaels lay the blame for the specious science supporting the Goreist fanaticism right at the feet of leftist politics and federal funding. Says Paltridge:

"...the average man in the street, a sensible chap who by now can smell the signs of an oversold environmental campaign from miles away, is beginning to suspect that it is politics rather than science which is driving the issue."...

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agw; globalwarming; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: rlmorel
".....and in the end, we might just escape them."

Sadly, this is but one of the fronts where we are being attacked.

Look no further than "gay rights" and the media blitz behind it to understand that the dissolution of the family is their real target.

Using science to denigrate and diminish the influence of the church is yet another front. The power of the state is being used to crush the "Little Sisters of the Poor" and the media is mum.

Abortion is the "sacrament" of all that's evil in this culture of death. Its the power of God and family that they most fear and it is these institutions they attack most ferociuosly.

Honor, integrity, valor are ridiculed and the only allowable heroes are anti-heroes; pigs and prostitutes.

Escape isn't an option.

21 posted on 02/11/2014 4:44:49 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Unfortunately, tenure in academia explicates these frauds and maintains them in their livelihood long after their fraud has been exposed. Will they and their political enablers truly ever be held accountable?
22 posted on 02/11/2014 5:36:07 AM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBonebrake

“She was going on about how winter is “becoming extinct”. I’d just read that Quadrant piece. I politely said “gee I hope you’re wrong”.”

I am not so polite and would have said something to the effect of “Gee, how long have they been letting idiots into Yale?” Being polite to these people is counterproductive. It reinforces confidence in their opinions. Challenging them likely wont help but MAY lead them to examine their beliefs (yeah right). Indoctrination and peer pressure are powerful things. So is public ridicule.


23 posted on 02/11/2014 5:53:41 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bump for later


24 posted on 02/11/2014 6:00:14 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

“...there not just good people and good scientists who have allowed themselves to be taken in by this, but science in general.”

“Good scientists” by definition are driven to critically examine data and their own biases. They are much less likely to be taken in by a trendy theory that goes against what is clearly observable. For example, I once had a Nobel Prize winner in Physics publicly challenge some data I was presenting on an organism that could metabolize and grow on a certain pollutant. He claimed to have done the calculations and that it was impossible. All the control experiments and other clear evidence did not disuade him. We agreed to disagree. Several years later he admitted he was wrong. The point is when reality flies in the face of your calculations, a good scientist re-examines his calculations and premises.


25 posted on 02/11/2014 6:09:37 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
As a teacher, it says a great deal about that teacher and probably the courses he/she took in college. Education majors take very little actual course work in their area. Lots of BS courses in method etc.
I have a degree in history and minor in anthro. I only had to take a couple methods courses and I am sure I know vastly more history than a typical grad. with a social studies degree in education.
That is the major problem. Not enough course work in what matters. The subject you are actually teaching.
26 posted on 02/11/2014 7:29:01 AM PST by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom; rlmorel

Science is still respected and based in truth, reality and practicality.

On any given day there are millions of activities involving professional and academic science but the ones that make the news are the rare breakthroughs that are approved for release or the politicized nonsense that give a bad name to the scientific field.


27 posted on 02/11/2014 7:49:24 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

I understand what you mean, and agree.

I think what I was driving at, poorly, was that not all those people are evil...many are simply flawed and were taken in by money, power and influence.

Many citizens were simply trusting and didn’t want to examine it for themselves.


28 posted on 02/11/2014 9:06:08 AM PST by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

We’ve always been at war with EastAsia.


29 posted on 02/11/2014 3:09:01 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Keep in mind that what you are describing is a symptom of the toolkit of Leftism. Call it Alinsky’s Rules if you like, but they’ve been used by communists going back at least to the French Revolution.

The Left started out attacking the funding of many in the basic sciences. The “science” didn’t matter, but the funding did. Corporate funding of basic scientific research, of the kind done pre-FDR, pre-progressivism in America, drove some of the most innovative products. The Left cannot have private success. It stinks of private property, thinking for one’s self, and the persistent liberty of a free mind. They loathe that.

So the funding, for the most “important” things, couldn’t come from private action. It needed public action. It needed government to remove the taint of bias.

Well, here we are.


30 posted on 02/11/2014 7:51:33 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Yep. I tell ya, as time passes, 1984 is looking less like fiction and more like a prediction.


31 posted on 02/11/2014 8:29:43 PM PST by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Yes. Well put.

Well, it is what they are doing with Health Care. Destroying it so government can be the savior.


32 posted on 02/11/2014 8:31:42 PM PST by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: generally
I can remember experiments in high school physics where we had to roll balls down a track and time how long it took them to reach certain points. As you might imagine, clicking a stopwatch at exactly the right instant was as much art as science. It required good attention and good reflexes.

I knew what the answers were “supposed” to be, but I dutifully did the experiment as designed and was not surprised to have some data points that didn’t perfectly fit the expected curve. Other students, who knew what the outcome was supposed to be, faked their data, so that it would exactly match the acceleration curve. To my surprise, they got better grades because they had the “right” data. The teacher was apparently too stupid to understand concepts like experimental error. He rewarded students who lied to make their “data” fit.

I wonder how much of that went on in other schools across the country. I wonder how often that still happens today in schools and in real laboratories.

In the real world, we working scientists are highly suspicious when we see perfect data. The other day, one of my colleagues found data he thought too perfect, and called everyone over to look and laugh at it.

Back in grad school, when my mentor asked me to produce a figure for an important publication, I made two pictures of my experimental result. One picture was almost perfect, the other was full of background. He chose the "ugly" picture for the publication, because it was what anyone following our protocol would probably see. I didn't cheat to get the perfect picture, I just decreased the exposure time, which minimized the visibility of the background.

33 posted on 02/12/2014 3:13:48 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem

Bm


35 posted on 02/12/2014 3:14:55 AM PST by Vision (Tune out, drop back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
I have reached the point I ignore that stuff completely. But some people just oscillate up and down with each pronouncement from some bozo on ABC evening news.

Coffee is good for you. Coffee is bad for you. Repeat cycle.

I think part of what drives that dynamic is that people want magic bullets. To be healthy, you must eat a balanced diet and exercise. But that is hard work, and too many people want an easy answer that bypasses the work. It would be wonderful if there were one magic vitamin which would guarantee perfect health if you eat it by the handful--but there isn't. It would be fantastic if obesity were really caused by consumption of one "bad" food, so that anyone wanting to avoid weight gain or lose weight would have but to avoid that one food and the pounds would evaporate. But the reality is that whether you eat that "bad" food or not--if you never drink a drop of soda, the current villain--you will not stay thin on a 5,000 calorie diet (unless you are an athlete).

P.S. Coffee is a gift from God. Enjoy it!

36 posted on 02/12/2014 3:30:31 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude
“Good scientists” by definition are driven to critically examine data and their own biases. They are much less likely to be taken in by a trendy theory that goes against what is clearly observable. For example, I once had a Nobel Prize winner in Physics publicly challenge some data I was presenting on an organism that could metabolize and grow on a certain pollutant. He claimed to have done the calculations and that it was impossible. All the control experiments and other clear evidence did not disuade him. We agreed to disagree. Several years later he admitted he was wrong. The point is when reality flies in the face of your calculations, a good scientist re-examines his calculations and premises.

Perhaps one of the hardest skills to learn as a scientist is that of being able to let go of a bias when the data does not support it. I think that skill is in short supply--heaven knows, most of our politicians utterly lack it, as evidenced by the strong push towards socialized medicine, despite decades of experience in many countries showing it does not work.

While scientists are often criticized for using "hedge" words and never just stating something outright, that speech habit is the mark of a well-trained scientist, one who knows that future data might invalidate his or her current opinion.

37 posted on 02/12/2014 3:42:49 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Indeed. However, too many people—probably a small percentage’ but too many nonetheless—paint us all with the same broad brush.

Anyone who has ever sought medical care and been cured of something that was a big killer in ages past—like a bacterial infection—should thank scientists. Without multitudes of scientists barricading themselves in their labs for hours at a time, never seeing sunlight, working doggedly on a single problem for decades, we would not have those cures.

I could say similar things about scientists in other fields, but I am admittedly biased towards the medical sciences.


38 posted on 02/12/2014 3:51:33 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
So is this...
39 posted on 02/12/2014 4:12:52 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
P.S. Coffee is a gift from God. Enjoy it!

So is Salvation. Choose it!

40 posted on 02/12/2014 4:13:58 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson