Skip to comments.
What Sarah Palin gets totally wrong about MLK Day and the 'race card' (Must've hit a nerve)
The Week ^
| January 21, 2014
| Peter Weber, senior editor
Posted on 01/21/2014 12:55:18 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Always covering for him, always making excuses. She volunteers 1,000 times more then Mr. Photo Op, Peter.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
LOL! I’m just guessin’ that he said it’s possible, just possible that some folks don’t like him cause he’s black. He even got that wrong. He’s halfrican-American. Color got nuthin’ to with it there berry.
2
posted on
01/21/2014 12:58:05 PM PST
by
rktman
(Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not to put too fine a point on it, but King was trying to end a very specific racial divide, and he wasn't really worried about white children being judged by the color of their skin.
Ending racism is ending racism, Herr Weber. You just called MLK a racist by saying that, Herr Weber.
3
posted on
01/21/2014 12:59:20 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He’s complaining about his numbers getting worse. I didn’t know he’s been getting blacker!!!
4
posted on
01/21/2014 1:00:40 PM PST
by
BillM
(.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; everyone
CLICK Yesterday
Happy MLK, Jr. Day!
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." Martin Luther King, Jr.
Mr. President, in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. and all who commit to ending any racial divide, no more playing the race card.
~Sarah Palin
5
posted on
01/21/2014 1:01:51 PM PST
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
6
posted on
01/21/2014 1:05:12 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: BillM
There’s almost nowhere to go but up from 4%. George Zimmerman is 25%.
7
posted on
01/21/2014 1:06:27 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Jealousy is when you count someone else's blessings instead of your own.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He rather clumsily works in some of the usual logical fallacies (”She wasn’t alive when King gave his speech”), but doesn’t quite get around to actually saying what he’s pretending that Palin got wrong.
8
posted on
01/21/2014 1:06:52 PM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He does hope that "the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave-owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood." But when he was speaking in 1963, nobody was really keeping the sons of slave-owners away from that table. Ah, I beg to differ with the author of this blather! The son's of slave owners were certainly being forced to stay away from the table of "Brotherhood" with the "Black Man" during the 60's! Any White man/woman/child found to be cavorting with any Black person was quickly reminded, and often harshly, of the penalty for doing so.
9
posted on
01/21/2014 1:06:53 PM PST
by
SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It was obama that flubbed the answer, he has an excuse for everything.
Palin just called him on it, but you're not allowed to point out the obvious anymore.
11
posted on
01/21/2014 1:09:53 PM PST
by
Pietro
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What a ridiculous article. Sarah Palin stated a quote from Martin L. King. Now, exactly what fact did she get wrong? The author is entitled to his opinions of what King did or did not accomplish, but thy remain just that; opinions. King may have chased away white on black fear in the south way back when, but I doubt he would have wanted it to reappear as black on black fear in the streets of modern day Chicago. Obama came visit all the soup kitchens he wants and it will have exactly zero effect on that.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Dr King didn’t mean that racial consideration should be a two way obligation, apparently.
13
posted on
01/21/2014 1:11:53 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not to put too fine a point on it, but King was trying to end a very specific racial divide, and he wasn't really worried about white children being judged by the color of their skin. So Dr. King was an egocentric intellectual dwarf who only cared about himself and "his people?"
14
posted on
01/21/2014 1:12:15 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
To: rktman
8/16ths White, 7/16ths Arab, 1/16 Black.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Maybe he has MLK and BHO confused?
16
posted on
01/21/2014 1:15:12 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Jealousy is when you count someone else's blessings instead of your own.)
To: SoldierDad
“Any White man/woman/child found to be cavorting with any Black person was quickly reminded, and often harshly, of the penalty for doing so.”
Maybe where you lived. Not where I was.
17
posted on
01/21/2014 1:17:53 PM PST
by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not to put too fine a point on it, but King was trying to end a very specific racial divide, and he wasn't really worried about white children being judged by the color of their skin Is Peter Weber suggesting that Martin Luther King Jr. was a racist who only cared about the treatment of blacks?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
OK, so this author is saying that MLK was actually a racist because he meant that blacks should receive preferential treatment in the law instead of simply equality under the law.
19
posted on
01/21/2014 1:22:16 PM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: RightOnTheBorder; MrB; onyx
20
posted on
01/21/2014 1:27:25 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Jealousy is when you count someone else's blessings instead of your own.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson