Posted on 01/15/2014 10:05:43 AM PST by Bigtigermike
It turns out that Senator Tom Coburn is a big supporter of Mark Levins new book The Liberty Amendments. When asked last night about this new 1000 plus page spending bill and the fact that the Senate will vote on it before anyone gets a chance to read it, Sen. Tom Coburn told Mark Levin that you cant prevent this stuff from happening because all we have is a bunch of career politicians who only care about getting reelected. He says the only way to fix Washington is for the states to convene a Convention of the States and limit their power, something he definitely supports.
Listen:
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
In Washington, but what about the states? (I am asking because I don’t have hard facts)
IF it is true that a majority of states have republican administrations, & IF those administrations are conservative enough to be relied upon- wouldn’t it be better to act while that is the case than waiting, hence the situation could change?
I want Ted Cruz to run.
He is about the only Republican considered likely to run that I would vote for right now
The problem is not the Constitution, it is with most of the men and women in Congress, the White House and Congress.
Election maps of red and blue counties indicate that in a convention of states and subsequent debates for ratifying proposed amendments conservatives probably have an adavantage.
Comparing the 1984 and 2012 maps also shows that liberal influence is growing and the time to act is at hand.
The media and public schools have been a big influence in distorting people's understanding of what they are voting on and the longer we dally the more we jeopardize our freedom.
Evidence the huge Senate majority we have.
BTW, “Republican” is not conservative.
Thats what I thought.
the absolute last think I want is a constitutional convention. what with the Communist party as the current regime, they will have no compunction against cheating (their hallmark) for the purpose of castrating the constitution.
leave it alone, and make your fight against those who would destroy it. it aint broke....don’t fix it...
I knew I should not try to speak logically with you.
The first thing Levin points out is that it’s not a constitutional convention.
If you don’t believe him take it up with him
I am so done with this conversation
How about Jeb Bush with Christie as attack dog VP, and Karl Rove running the campaign ?
The deadly three.
-—The only, ONLY way to limit government is to limit the careers of big-government politicians in both parties-—
And the only way to do that is with an amendment to the Constitution limiting congressional terms. Of course, Congress would never pass this, which is why we need a convention of the states for proposing amendments to the Constitution.
Levin and Coburn are right.
I have a touch of flu, you gave me a coughing fit I was laughing so hard
Say what you want about the Bush’s, they know their way around the WH. Probably could skip the orientation and tour.
Okay, good point. You had me worried for a minute.
Separated from the uniparty by distinct interests are the states.
Most state legislators serve on a part time basis. Many are businessmen. They all see the accelerating coercion of the states and the people by the DC uniparty.
States will send delegates, not representatives to an amendment convention. The delegates will have commissions, legal instructions that set limits to what they can vote for. I cannot imagine a plurality of states will not look out for their interests, which means putting the genie of tyranny back in its bottle.
There is little time to save what remains of our republic.
You’re not listening to the purpose of the convention.
Did I not say exactly the same thing??
It takes 38 states to control this country, every bit of it.
Why take issue when we are saying the same thing?
Don’t understand.
One way was for Pelosi to sit for a year on emails from Mark Foley to former House pages, and then begin a scorched Earth campaign using the Foley emails to convince the country that Republicans were preying on your children from a "culture of corruption.'
Denny Hastert, standing up for disgraced House Member Democrat William Jefferson against the FBI that raided his House office looking for bribe cash in his freezer, didn't help either.
-PJ
To answer a question like that, I think a simple example would suffice. Let's use the hypothetical case that a repeal of the 17th amendment is passed.
If you were a sitting Senator from a state that has chosen to send someone else in your place, what do you do? Do you refuse to vacate your office because you are used to ignoring the Constitution when it suits you?
Can you seriously envision a case where a sitting member of government refuses to abide by the results of newly passed Constitutional amendments?
-PJ
Sure I can. His party sues in the Supreme Court and he’s seated until the resulting Constitutional issues are resolved. That might take awhile if it is intended to take awhile.
I think it’s the way you phrased it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.