Posted on 01/06/2014 8:02:24 AM PST by ComtedeMaistre
The recent media controversy over the MSNBC anchor who criticized Romney for adopting a black baby, reflects how liberals view white conservatives.
Liberals believe that white conservatives should not be raising children at all, including their own biological children. When white conservatives adopt black children, they view it as a form of child abuse. White conservatives are seen by liberals as haters of blacks, and that they will teach their black babies to hate blacks.
That attitude may seem funny to conservatives, but the liberals are serious. One blog commented on this issue: http://godfatherpolitics.com/12835/conservatives-permitted-adopt-black-babies/
Obama was raised by whites. Wonder if they object to that.
It always seems that when you point out the hypocrisy,
they excuse themselves and their “anointed ones” as special such that their rules shouldn’t apply to them.
Needs repeating... Obama was raised by whites. Wonder if they object to that.
but white liberals it’s ok...
I’ll probably step in it here, but I don’t get the “why” of the matter.
Is there a shortage of needy white orphan children? Why couldn’t his son help out one of our own?
What does your response have to do with the premise of the article?
This has to do with more than just the Romneys. Black social workers have always opposed interracial adoption.
They’re probably surprised that a black kid missed the abortionist’s suction machine. Can’t have that!
It's sad but true. They consider Chris Christie a far right psycho too.
Some — not many — libs adopt black children.
Mostly they are pro-abortion (not adoption).
The reason is that the left wants a permanent, angry, underperforming underclass. This kind of adoption will not create any more new dropouts, and so they oppose it.
Don’t doubt me on this.
They’re deathly afraid that the kid will not have a ghetto identity, and not want to go live on the plantation.
Worse yet, he’ll be an example of how culture and not skin color is the deciding factor in success in this country.
It doesn’t happen because Whites are the only group dumb enough to commit cultural suicide at this point in history.
Generations from now will think we, as a group, lost our minds.
Hadn’t thought about that. . .you are right.
Harumph!!!
While that child will almost certainly never want for material things, he/she will never really feel a part of that family, will never truly feel a sense that he/she belongs.
I don’t believe that for a second.
The kid and the family probably won’t even know he’s “black”.
To each his own. I just think we should look after our own. When I see it, I think of it as more a stylish thing to do.
“The kid and the family probably wont even know hes black”
You don’t think he’ll look at a family picture someday? Really?
You don’t think he might trace a family tree some day? Get checked for a disease that the rest of the family doesn’t have to worry about (and vice/versa? Get asked constantly who his “real” parents were?
We can’t create your own reality no matter how hard we try.
I’ve seen it before, numerous times -
when kids act the same within the same set of behavioral expectations,
something insignificant like relative melanin gets ignored.
I agree.
The only way for Whites to truly show they are good people today is to help those other than their own. In fact, if Whites specifically seek to help other Whites all hell breaks loose.
No other group has this mindset. No other group is dumb enough to buy into it but that’s where White people are today.
While its a good thing to help any and all people, seeking out those the most different from your own kind to help is a symptom of weakness. Shows a certain herd mentality....in my opinion of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.