Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY DID “UNNAMED SOURCE” FALSELY ACCUSE SENATE LEADER OF ATTACK ON TEA PARTY, CRUZ AND LEE?
Tea Party News Network ^ | 11.22.13 | Todd Cefaratti, Editor of TPNN

Posted on 11/26/2013 5:54:46 AM PST by Resettozero

As vulnerable Democrats, realizing the inevitable, abandon the Obamacare ship to avoid being pulled under with it, Democrats are hoping that the Republican Party will similarly implode. President Obama, in conjunction with leading Democrats, has worked tirelessly to drive a wedge in the Republican Party by trying to pit moderate Republicans against conservatives.

While the Republican Party can certainly benefit from stronger adherence to principles of limited government, the call for a split of the Republican Party (and their power) is most prominent amongst Democrats who recognize that a divided party is a weaker opponent.

Recently, Breitbart News reported that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell had railed against Tea Party and conservative legislators in a conference call to donors. Breitbart reported that, according to an anonymous source, Sen. McConnell had ranted against the Tea Party and named Tea Party Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee by name.

Loading...

The anonymous source also claimed that the principled Senate conservatives were “schoolyard bullies” that needed a “punch in the nose.”

What a “win” for Democrats!… That is, if it were true.

It seems that the anonymous source had an agenda of his own or otherwise misunderstood the Senator’s comments as The Washington Examiner obtained a recording of the entire conversation, provided by American Crossroads PAC. In the 27-minute long recording, McConnell spoke to donors and their advisers and offered a brief question-and-answer segment.

During this call, Senator McConnell addressed the Senate Conservative Fund (SCF), a PAC that has been routinely attacking McConnell as he handles crises in the Senate that maintains a Democrat majority.

The SCF have been relentless in their criticisms and Senator McConnell has appeared frustrated as he has had to weather the assaults from Democrats and those in his own party who seem displeased with the Republican leadership...

(Excerpt) Read more at tpnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Resettozero

the article ends up pleading “let’s not play their [dems] game.”

Of course, the subtext of articles like this is that “unity” is achieved by stopping all challenges to R leadership, making sure the oatmealish RINO’s are nominated and then voting for them in huge numbers.

Of course, the alternative subtext is that leadership should start listening to Republicans, that liberty/conservatives should be nominated, and all the moderate R’s should vote for them in huge numbers.


61 posted on 11/26/2013 8:04:49 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

If you are not a GOPe apologist/sycophant then you have my apology. If support any GOPe candidate then you have my derision. Please be clear about where you stand.


62 posted on 11/26/2013 8:06:56 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
WHAT is it that looks and sounds like a duck to you?


63 posted on 11/26/2013 8:17:33 AM PST by McGruff (Obama lied. Period!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
We need to win the Senate and the House...then purge all you want.

Define "win".

If you're talking about re-electing incumbent Senators and Reps solely because they've got an R velcroed to their sleeve, then you're wasting your attention and effort, merely to gain a hollow majority.

We're in a fight to save this country. Collaborators and quislings will sell us out just as fast as our avowed enemies. Probably even faster.

Ted Cruz has set the bar. If a candidate (incumbent or not) doesn't measure up to that standard, they'll get no vote, and no attention from me.

64 posted on 11/26/2013 9:04:32 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

AMEN!


65 posted on 11/26/2013 10:00:57 AM PST by Scarlet Pimpernel (And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
I for one hope to hell McConnell wins.


Not No! He77 No.

66 posted on 11/26/2013 10:12:03 AM PST by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

She was a fruit cake on radio and on tv.


67 posted on 11/26/2013 12:53:01 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

She lost because she got no support from the guy whom she beat in the primary. Who was a horse’s @ss I might add.


68 posted on 11/26/2013 12:53:55 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson