Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz says he is a US citizen 'by birth' despite being born in Canada
FOXNEWS.com ^ | October 28, 2013 | unknown

Posted on 10/29/2013 9:02:51 AM PDT by txrangerette

Cruz said in an interview with Fusion that because his mother is an American citizen he is a citizen as well.

"I was a U.S. Citizen by birth and beyond that I'm going to leave it to others to worry about...legal consequences", he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; birferism; birth; certifigate; citizen; cruz; doublestandard; election2014; election2016; gettedcruz; mother; naturalborncitizen; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,041-1,042 next last
To: justiceseeker93

Se JR’s post 497 in this thread. Don’t risk being banned over this fringe nonsense, you are a valuable contributor.


621 posted on 10/30/2013 6:19:02 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Couldn’t find any, huh?


622 posted on 10/30/2013 6:21:32 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
"Ted Cruz is a very good Senator and a principled man. But unfortunately he is not a Natural Born Citizen, having been born in Canada, and accordingly, is constitutionally ineligible for the presidency or vice-presidency, barring a constitutional amendment changing the qualifications for those offices."

Sorry, but he is eligible. With the current plethora of concern Cruz birther trolls pimping that myth, continuing with that line is going to earn you a permanent ZOT. If you disagree, take it up with JimRob.

623 posted on 10/30/2013 6:22:06 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 592 | View Replies]

To: Impy

How do your comments here help solve the problem of Hillary Clinton having standing to challenge Cruz’ eligibility if he wins a Presidential election, and having the decision on Cruz’s eligibility made by the same guy who ruled Obamacare constitutional after changing his mind at the last moment?

How do you suggest we protect Ted Cruz from a one-two punch by Hillary Clinton and John Roberts, leaving the GOP without ANYBODY? You think we should cross our fingers and hope that Hillary becomes somebody besides the calculating, power-hungry wife of a guy who appointed DC Circuit judges to cover his and his friends’ crimes?


624 posted on 10/30/2013 6:28:02 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Pathetic troll tactics, madam.


625 posted on 10/30/2013 6:29:12 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Impy

and who the heck made you thread police?


626 posted on 10/30/2013 6:29:16 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj

Hillary isn’t gonna challenge jack because she knows it will be laughed out of court and make her look foolish.

The world outside of a few people on the Internet GIVES NO CREDENCE TO THESE FRINGE THEORIES. Do you dig it? They also don’t care about 9/11 trutherism or the idea that moon landing was faked.

Thank you for your CONCERN.


627 posted on 10/30/2013 6:32:50 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; fieldmarshaldj

I agree with Jim Robinson, the owner of this site on this issue. Most of us here are VERY sick of you wackjobs trying to use this nonsense that didn’t work on Obama against our best conservative candidate.


628 posted on 10/30/2013 6:36:57 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

How do YOU intend to protect Ted Cruz from a lawsuit by Hillary Clinton the day after election day 2016, claiming he is not eligible? When the DC Circuit, which is filled with Bill Clinton’s “Magnificent Seven” judges (who meet privately to see who gets which cases so they can cover for their political cronies) gets that case are they going to rule that Hillary has no standing?

When they take the case because she has standing are they going to rule against Hillary? When it gets appealed to SCOTUS is John Roberts going to rule against Hillary and let Ted Cruz take the White House - against the wishes of everybody in DC and everybody at the NSA and all the other bureaucracy?

It is not conservatives BRINGING UP Cruz’s eligibility situation; it’s media sources like Slate, Salon, and Yahoo. Why do you think they’re doing that? What are they preparing for? This is the same thing they did with “Innocence of Mohammed” which then then blamed Benghazi on. Why do they bring this issue up over and over and over again? I’ve seen Constitutionalists respond to the issue once it’s been brought up, but why is it always the liberals who bring it up in the first place? What do you think they are trying to do to us and to Cruz? What is their end game?


629 posted on 10/30/2013 6:38:43 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

He and his buddy showed up simultaneously, suddenly, and started acting a little bit like the Nation of Islam folks in Philadelphia with the billy clubs, talking about it being the day of the Black man and we don’t need no white crackas.

Strange.


630 posted on 10/30/2013 6:41:04 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Why don’t you tell site owner Jim Robinson that he acted like the “Nation of Islam” when he banned one your fellow travelers in post 349 this thread. I double dog dare you.


631 posted on 10/30/2013 6:44:56 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: Impy

You twit. You’re saying that zero should be allowed to get away with possible identity theft and numerous forgeries, just so that here’s no further discussion on the subject of the meaning of ‘Natural Born’ ???

You’re a bully, that’s all you are.

I’m an Australian and have no interest other than the very real harm zero is doing to the ENTIRE WORLD - my interest has nothing to do with anyone else, or any future candidate.

You have no right to attempt to silence me.


632 posted on 10/30/2013 6:45:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Just like Obamacare was gonna get laughed out of court, right? And now we’re all just howling with laughter because that SCOTUS sure knew how to blow Obama’s ridiculous claims about the Constitution out of the water. And the media - why, the media really exposed how embarrassing it was for Obama to make such ASININE claims about the Constitution, that everybody knew were totally screwed up.

Well, I’m glad you’re so confident that the system works. Now what are you here at FR for? And what exactly is it that you think we need Ted Cruz for?


633 posted on 10/30/2013 6:46:42 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

It feels like I’m having a conversation with Bill Ayres.


634 posted on 10/30/2013 6:46:45 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Exactly how would that help solve the problem of a judiciary that can pull a decision out of a hat at any time and knock out Ted Cruz if they want?

Some of us are here to solve problems, Impy, not agitate and threaten.


635 posted on 10/30/2013 6:49:05 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

You may be. The whole argument seems to be “Might makes right”. I guess that makes Obama right...


636 posted on 10/30/2013 6:50:13 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

You have mail.

I’m through here. I’m past giving disgusting trolls my oxygen.


637 posted on 10/30/2013 6:56:16 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; Fred Nerks

Nice try changing the subject, butterdezillion. Thanks again for the CONCERN.

Your problem isn’t ME, Fred Nerks, all I can do it is mock you and dismiss your prattle. Your problem is the owner of this site who might ZOT (ban) you because HE has said your views aren’t welcome here.

“kabumpo” was banned for his post 309 which has a very similar tone to what you 2 are saying calling people who dismiss your BS names like “Bill Ayres”.

I’ll reiterate it’s absolutely INSANE to turn these recently invented fringe legal theories on Cruz. The gun wouldn’t go off against Obama so lets turn it on our own heads, brilliant.

You wanna know what the left is doing about this right now? Laughing at how you kooks are distracting us with this garbage. CRUZ 2016!


638 posted on 10/30/2013 7:01:05 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Would you be opposed to a court ruling before the 2016 primary in which the judiciary defines NBC so that what you say is so legally certain really IS legally certain?

Why or why not?


639 posted on 10/30/2013 7:04:42 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]

To: Impy

The “Concern” runs deep around here.


640 posted on 10/30/2013 7:13:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,041-1,042 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson