Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Morning Plum: Panic sets in among GOP elites
Wash Post ^ | 9/19/13 | Greg Sargent

Posted on 09/21/2013 10:38:40 AM PDT by jimbo123

Karl Rove is always worth reading for a glimpse of how GOP elites are thinking, and his latest Op ed suggest real panic setting in over the chaos and division spreading among Congressional Republicans over how to handle this fall’s fiscal fights. Rove confirms an argument that will be familiar to readers of this blog: Public disapproval of Obamacare does not translate into public support for GOP efforts to sabotage the law.

-snip-

The poll is obviously one commissioned to advance an argument against defunding, but the very fact that Crossroads GPS — whose mission is to win elections — commissioned it and is calling Republicans’ attention to it is itself noteworthy.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americancrossroads; crossroads4obamacare; crossroadsgps; defundkarlrove; defundobamacare; gop4obamacare; gope; nwo; obamacare; rove; rove4obamacare; rovecare; rovepac; rovesuperpac; rovocare; tokyorove; turdblossom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: jimbo123

with rove and his ilk it is not about ideology it is all about making money.
Screw rove.


41 posted on 09/21/2013 11:18:08 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) ( Hey Rubio, eat pooh pal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

There is a stirring and movement in the dovecote of the Republican party, where all the doves of “peace” reside.

But there is, in fact, no possibility or justification of peace with this atrocity that is the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010”. Poorly conceived and impossible to administer in anything like the manner its authors envisioned, this abomination is single-handedly, destroying innovation and growth within the job market, causing great unsteadiness in terms of growth of manufacturing, retail, and service sectors of the economy, and proving that there is no meaningful patient protection or that health insurance premiums under its provisions are in the least affordable without huge subsidies.

Cut off its funding, and let it wither on the vine. Meanwhile, the House should be getting around to passing an alternative health care access bill, preferably much less convoluted and filled with legalese and escape clauses than the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010”, which means it may be a great deal shorter and much more comprehensible by both legislators and the general public.

Do not let the rhetoric surrounding the “sanctity” of Obamacare become the only framework for discussion.

Simply because something has been “the law of the land” for some period of time does not make any special virtue of preserving what was a highly evident mistake in the first place. And while we are at it, might revisit both Social Security and Medicare, too.


42 posted on 09/21/2013 11:18:35 AM PDT by alloysteel (Those who deny natural climate change are forever doomed to stupidity. AGW is a LIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; All
Hey Rove and ALL other Republican elites, it IS real simple:

Do you support the redefinition of full time, i.e. the new 30 hour work week?
Do you support the employer penalty of $2,000 per employee vs. the cost of health care insurance that costs well over $2,000 per employee?
Do you support ALL the new taxes under ObamaCare?
Do you support the hiring of 16,000 NEW IRS agents sent to destroy employers and voter, many YOUR constituents?
Do you support the Death Panel?
Do you support the 40% excise tax on early retirees’ health care insurance?
Do you support the 40% excise tax on union members’ health care insurance?
Do you support the Data Mining of the FEDRAL Government under ObamaCare?
Do support ACORN advising people on ObamaCare?

If you do, then vote with the Democrats. If not vote with Cruz.

IT IS THAT EASY!

43 posted on 09/21/2013 11:20:40 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Here’s how he characterizes the issue of 1/6 of the now and future GDP, with 17 trillion debt, dumping the mess onto our children who will not survive it without major reform, breakdown of the entire workforce and economic system and unemployment which is being lied about (but will come out shortly after the conservative pres is sworn in as surely as two planes flying into the WTC):

“...over how to handle this fall’s fiscal fights.”

This fall’s fiscal fights.

Like “...the September Issue of Vogue”

And, as if there is even a yearly fight. When was the last budget passed?


44 posted on 09/21/2013 11:22:23 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Check again Juan. The Hobbits WON.


45 posted on 09/21/2013 11:27:00 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Of course! The key to R’s winning elections is to be more like D’s. It’s a simple formula.

Then, when the D’s can go further over the left cliff to full communism, Rove can advise the R’s to continue their leftward march to be more like D’s.

Complete lunacy. The nation cries out for a restoration of the Constitutional Republic and all we get is a ultra-fast dash to tyranny by the D’s or just a super-fast dash to the same destination by the R’s. We desperately need an Opposition Party, not Vanilla and Vanilla-Bean.


46 posted on 09/21/2013 11:29:33 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
The too-big-too-fail mega banks, the key central bank leaders (in the USA) and the political elites have a huge but largely covered up problem with massively excessive debt, an economy that is being barely propped up by enormous money printing, huge Federal deficits (cash accounting) and much larger Federal deficits when using more accurate, GAAP accounting for liabilities being incurred on an (honest) accrual basis.

They cannot avoid facing the debt limit collision course, but as a powerful coalition which lines up big money, big government, and big media interests, they are well positioned to effectively blame the R's for the rapid descent of our unstable financial system if a material implosion and asset bubble pop occurs in the weeks/months ahead.

In other words, those who spotlight the Ponzi scheme and sound the alarm will effectively be (wrongly) blamed as the causes of the now inevitable avalanche that is waiting to occur if triggered.

Think Detroit as metaphor: thinking people have seen its approaching collapse for many years, but it was much easier to pretend that the obvious would not happen. It does not appear that a majority of Americans are willing to face and deal with reality until a Detroit-like outcome happens at a national scale.

Sadly.

47 posted on 09/21/2013 11:30:29 AM PDT by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“I think we have Ted Cruz, Mike Lee and Rand Paul and some other stalwarts to thank for precipitating this battle.”

You better do some checking on Runt Paul, he doesn’t fit in that group.

Runt Paul already said he is against defunding Owebamecare in the CR.


48 posted on 09/21/2013 11:32:19 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Really? Thanks for the correction.


49 posted on 09/21/2013 11:34:28 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Typical GOP-E cowardice. They don’t even want to try to fight they want to try to sneek in the back door which is the approach that worked so damn well for Romney and McCain.
In 2010 what drove people to the polls for Republicans was the passionate opposition to Obamacare. I’m convinced what people like Rove want is to suppress conservative turnout not increase it which is why they are pushing a strategy that refuses to fight and make the clear case. Its not a hard case to make. People are losing their jobs and health benefits over this. Its an opportunity to make a case and win over the working class to the GOP, the citizen working class that is not the foreign fruit picking class they seem focused so heavily on.


50 posted on 09/21/2013 11:35:30 AM PDT by Maelstorm (If all are treated as suspects it will not be long before we all are treated as prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Everything you want to know about Runt Paul can be found in the Liberaltarian party platform.


51 posted on 09/21/2013 11:38:20 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Very good post.

I would add, though, that a big part of the problem here is that most Republicans in Washington are 100% behind some of the key provisions of ObamaCare. The combination of the employer mandate for certain employees and the individual mandate that will be regulated by the IRS, for example, effectively accomplishes something that can best be described as the best thing ever to happen to corporate America ... the eradication of employer-paid medical insurance.

52 posted on 09/21/2013 11:44:42 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Yes, the elimination of employment-based health insurance would certainly improve America's competitive position.

Do I understand correctly that employment-based health insurance grew as a reaction to the Internal Revenue Code?


53 posted on 09/21/2013 11:48:03 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Employment-based health insurance can be traced back to the early 1940s, when U.S. companies began offering this benefit to their employees in lieu of pay hikes while Federal wage controls were in place during World War II.

The link to the Internal Revenue Code remains is an important one, as the IRC contains special provisions related to employer-paid health insurance that apply to almost no other employer-paid benefits. If an employer paid the premiums for an employee's disability or life insurance, for example, this would have to be reported by the employee as taxable income. The cost of medical insurance, however, is tax-deductible for the employer as a business expense but doesn't have to be reported as income by the employees on their tax returns.

54 posted on 09/21/2013 11:53:42 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

That’s good from a nasty, lying troll.....


55 posted on 09/21/2013 11:56:45 AM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Thanks for the reminder.

So we see once again the lesson of unintended consequences. Also an occasion for me to trumpet Nathan Bedford's second Maxim:

Failed socialism is invariably reformed with more socialism


56 posted on 09/21/2013 11:57:46 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Great Maxim!


57 posted on 09/21/2013 11:59:46 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Shady

Some of the things that Sean does are baffling. I believe him to be a good Christian man but he befriends people of evil far too often. His love affair with Lieberman for example.


58 posted on 09/21/2013 12:01:31 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Truth2012

I agree... Dick Morris is far more astute and accredited than rove.... and I can’t stand Dick Morris! That says a lot about rove right there.


59 posted on 09/21/2013 12:03:18 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The GOPe is always ready to compromise with Democrats but not with the conservative wing of their own party.

What’s up with that?


60 posted on 09/21/2013 12:06:14 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson