Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In hindsight, did Reagan err in backing the mujahideen in Afghanistan during the 80s?

Posted on 09/07/2013 10:13:51 PM PDT by jeltz25

With all the recent talk about the rebels in Syria being affiliated with AQ, I got to thinking about the "rebels" against the Russians back in the 80s.

Now, AQ didn't exist back then, but they were clearly the forerunners of AQ and many of them grew into AQ and other terrorist movements. If you look back many of the folks the CIA backed back then(working hand in hand with the Wahabbis in Saudi and the ISI in Pakistan) were not exactly the salt of the earth.

Hindsight is always 20/20, but just wondering how folks feel about that now. You could argue that beating the USSR was the bigger issue(although you could also say Iran is the bigger issue here).

The situations seem pretty similar to me in many respects.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; United Kingdom; War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; alqaeda; iran; israel; lebanon; randsconcerntrolls; reagan; russia; syria; unitedkingdom; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Sherman Logan
There was a non-trivial chance of the USSR taking over the world, or that its attempts to do so would end only in WWIII. Doesn’t anybody remember the claims that only our disarmament could avert Armageddon?

No kidding, it was real, and we were on the edge of it, but when the Soviet Union was killed off, the media instantly went into erasing mode.

There are decades of history almost gone from memory, the military budgets, the wars, the training deaths and massive militarys, Air Forces, nuclear armaments, great military exercises moving 10s of thousands of troops overseas for winter exercises, a time of history that helped make America a land of 25 million veterans, erased, laughed off, described as a scare, an illusion.

41 posted on 09/08/2013 1:05:59 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Libertarians, the left's social agenda with conservatism's economics, which is impossible of course)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Yup.

The other thing I remember is the constant claim that the USSR was only defending itself against our aggression, that if they dropped their guard we would destroy them. That the conflict was both sides’ fault. The old moral equivalency.

Then USSR fell apart and there was zero aggression from the West against them. In fact, a general tendency to want to be of assistance. IOW, the only cause of the conflict was the antagonism of the commies. When that went away, there was no conflict.

Yet somehow nobody ever seems to use this indisputable evidence to point out how totally wrong leftists were about the cause of the Cold War.


42 posted on 09/08/2013 1:18:14 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Mark Steyn: "In the Middle East, the enemy of our enemy is also our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“There was a non-trivial chance of the USSR taking over the world”

The only people who believe that are over 50 and/or Freepers. :-(


43 posted on 09/08/2013 1:18:37 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

Reagan did the right thing. By defeating the Soviets in Afghanistan (the Stinger missiles turned the tide), he helped really speed up the fall of the Soviet Union.

However, an unexpected result was the unemployment of thousands of Islamic fanatics, who then went to work for whoever paid them, including Bin Laden and his affiliated terrorist groups in other countries.

We may find out that some Arab countries also paid the fanatics to stay away from them, by siccing them on Somalia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mali, etc.


44 posted on 09/08/2013 1:34:28 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The other thing I remember is the constant claim that the USSR was only defending itself against our aggression, that if they dropped their guard we would destroy them. That the conflict was both sides’ fault. The old moral equivalency. Then USSR fell apart and there was zero aggression from the West against them. In fact, a general tendency to want to be of assistance. IOW, the only cause of the conflict was the antagonism of the commies. When that went away, there was no conflict. Yet somehow nobody ever seems to use this indisputable evidence to point out how totally wrong leftists were about the cause of the Cold War.

What a pure and accurate description, you really know and remember this history.

45 posted on 09/08/2013 1:34:59 AM PDT by ansel12 ( Libertarians, the left's social agenda with conservatism's economics, which is impossible of course)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

In Hindsight, did Nixon err in going to China?


46 posted on 09/08/2013 3:23:20 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

I remember pictures of those booby-trapped teddy bears

that the Russians would drop for kids to play with.

At the time it made me mad.I approved at the time of us

sending those Stingers to take out the Hinds

Don`t thnk we really knew at the time how really bad the

muslims were


47 posted on 09/08/2013 3:28:12 AM PDT by Harold Shea (RVN `70 - `71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos; jeltz25

Also a Texas Congressman, Charlie Wilson, had a lot to do with funding the muj against the Soviets. Here’s an obit that talks about that:

http://archives.dawn.com/archives/8944

and there’s a book on the subject called Charlie Wilson’s War that would be worthwhile for anyone wanting to get more fully up to speed on the subject. Just reading the summary and comments on the book at Amazon would probably be worthwhile.

People attribute anything hat happens during a President’s Administration to that President, when the reality is much more complicated, especially for anything as big as the US gov’t.


48 posted on 09/08/2013 3:44:52 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

There were a lot of Cold War casualties stretching back to 1945. Quite a number of sites discuss this and try to tabulate incidents.

http://membership-americancoldwarvets.org/cold-war-casualties


49 posted on 09/08/2013 3:51:04 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

It turned out to be a key move in ending the Soviet Union.


50 posted on 09/08/2013 4:05:29 AM PDT by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

No


51 posted on 09/08/2013 4:10:16 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

No. Totally different situation. Russian imperialism was a threat to the United States. That was a fight for survival in the face of an existential danger - a fight that was won.

Obama is consciously abetting terrorism, a variety of which directly threatens this country. It would be like Carter bombing the Shah out of power in favor of the mullahs (which really isn’t too far from what he did, come to think of it).


52 posted on 09/08/2013 4:17:59 AM PDT by antiterrorist77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Here's the passage at issue:
In the 1980s, the war caucus in Congress armed bin Laden and the mujaheddin in their fight with the Soviet Union. In fact, it was the official position of the State Department to support radical jihad against the Soviets. We all know how well that worked out.
Let's leave aside for now the insulting, utterly asinine, sickening, inexcusable use of the phrase "war caucus" to describe those (including Reagan!) who supported the mujaheddin against the Soviets. That word choice alone is almost entirely disqualifying for its purveyor to ever be president.

Instead, let's just look at a little history here -- because the ignorance evident in this paragraph is truly astonishing. One would be hard pressed to find even a single historian, whether right, left, or center, who would argue anything other than that the Soviet failure in Afghanistan was not just a huge factor, but probably an essential one, in the Soviets' ultimate loss of the Cold War.
[Rand Paul’s Really Ignorant Paragraph | 7 Feb 2013]

53 posted on 09/08/2013 5:21:43 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
The right thing to do now is bring all our soldiers and equipment home and throw out illegals and put up a wall isolate ourselves along with getting Obama out. I sound like Ron Paul.
54 posted on 09/08/2013 5:41:31 AM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

It didnt start with reagan, It started with Carter

Reagan did do more, undeniably, but it started with Carter


55 posted on 09/08/2013 5:43:28 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Lk 16:31 And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the prophets neither will theybe persuaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

NO!!! Reagan was dismantling the USSR....Afghanistan was merely the vehicle.


56 posted on 09/08/2013 6:04:41 AM PDT by ontap (***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

President Reagans biggest blunder was picking Geo. Bush for his vice president!!!


57 posted on 09/08/2013 6:06:26 AM PDT by ontap (***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
thoughts?

No thought necessary. The Soviets were advancing everywhere (Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Angola, Afghanistan, Grenada, et al in 1970's alone) and significant communist guerrilla movements were being trained, funded and equipped by the Soviets in Colombia, El Salvador and various other countries around the globe, merely waiting for a moment of weakness to administer the coup de grace. The Soviets caused us 100K dead in Korea and Vietnam, and were responsible for the Communist victory in China that led to those wars. Payback was a long time in coming and nowhere near what they inflicted on us. Every single time I hear of a Muslim terror attack in Russia, I smile, because of the butcher's bill they made us, and the countries they converted to Communism, pay - death tolls that amounted to tens of millions dead. I suspect animus regarding what the Russians did during the Cold War informs the kinds of decisions older GOP pols are making about Syria - the thinking here is that these evil and bloodthirsty scumbags don't get to have a say.

58 posted on 09/08/2013 8:01:18 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

He did not let. Remember the DemocRATS had the house. They pissed away all of the revenue that Reagan’s tax cuts generated


59 posted on 09/08/2013 9:02:45 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Correct but Reagan should have used more Vetoes. If they overrode the vetoes, fine. But he should have tried.


60 posted on 09/08/2013 10:09:59 AM PDT by entropy12 (With no fear of re-election, Obama is becoming more radical left..thanks a lot all you who abstained)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson