The WSJ loves Obama. For several reasons, but mostly because of the immigration issue — slave labor is good for business. They might as well support his foreign adventures too.
Corporate America always want globalism and dicarding Patriotism. Any sentiment that opposes it threatens their unabash ability to make money even if it creates problems that are dumped on the US taxpayer. Syria is a test of power as Americans sick of cost and blood for an American empire vs the corporation/sociopaths who want Empire America so they can enrich themselves.
I’m not sure why they love him. They don’t like his Constitutional positions (or lack thereof) and find him arrogant. And “slave labor” is not good for business, and they’re certainly not supporting Obama’s position on immigration, which is all Muslims, all the time, no background checks, etc.
I think there’s an element of fear there.