That shouldn’t be hard to do.
If the United States were to engage Syria militarily it’s pretty much unwinnable because of the threats the US faces from Russian missiles which are a decade ahead of the US. I hope the Congress votes no.
Sarah Palin on Obama: He was against Bush’s wars?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3061479/posts
Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name.
I got an e-mail from a friend who said ZERO messing around with Syria is like a monkey with a live hand grenade.
Congress Critters....impeach Obama. Deny Obama an approval to attack Syria!!! Defund Obamacare -———www.dontfundobamacare.com, Lee/Cruz petition!!!
Zero pro-war stance is nothing more than his rhetoric catching up with his pride. Once he drew a red line in the sand without having a clue that what to do if it was crossed he now find himself looking like a fool.
The situation is so obvious I’m surprised even a RINO or Bushbot don’t GET IT..
Obama is a drone taking orders.. thats why he appears to go one way and then goes another..
And whatever he says is doubletalk... Jackie Gleason style himmina himmina..
Some cabal decides to do one thing and it matters little whats been already said..
The cabal MUST be obeyed..
The only thing I’m afraid of.. is that Congress generally is in control of the Cabal as well..
And maybe even the Supremes..
The italian Mafia easily controlled many governments and police departments..
Why not a super Mafia.. the Progressive Mafia..
With certain “MADE MEN/WOMEN”, queers and various other degenerates. ...
Don’t forget the Capos... there must be Capos.. leg breakers and other intimidators..
Steven King eat yer heart out..
Obama can’t be a hypocrite.
Christians are hypocrites if they fail to live up to their lofty ideal (even if they sincerely believe those ideals and make a major effort to model their lives on those standards, they are still called hypocrites if they fail.
Conservatives are hypocrites if they oppose an idea that any republican has ever advocated. Romney supported Romneycare, so any conservative who opposes any form of socialized medicine is a racist and a hypocrite. It doesn’t matter that conservatives opposed Romneycare and the individual mandate when Romney implemented them in Massachusetts, conservatives are still called hypocrites for opposing them when they were forced on us by an alleged woman (Pelosi), an alleged black American (Obama), and an alleged Mormon (Reid).
But a black liberal cannot be a hypocrite. Let’s use a different term. Perhaps we should say that Obama is temporarily misguided, and that is only because of the unrelenting and irrational opposition of the vast right wing conspiracy, which is Bush’s fault.
Good article. The only one of the four options offered by Hanson with which I disagree is that Obama is a naïf and just learning some hard lessons. I definitely think he’s not very bright, and he’s ignorant and actually doesn’t want to learn or to understand the reality; but this comes out of malevolence and a desire to punish the US, as Hanson notes elsewhere, as well as out of his ideological committment to a fantasy Third World Islamic movement of which he believes he is the leader.
The only point at which naïveté may enter into it is in this latter belief; I think he doesn’t realize that each Muslim faction considers its particular leader to be the potential new caliph, and they’re not going to welcome him with open arms as he expected because they actually consider him an upstart rival.
Question: If the president takes us to war and this escalates quickly, can the government use it as an excuse to bypass all concerns of the deficit, which is a looming spectre in the next month?
But also domestically. The free America must be torn down to make way for his socialist dictatorship