Posted on 08/30/2013 5:40:17 PM PDT by American Dream 246
Full Title: Sarah Palin obliterates Obama on Syria: President Obamas advertised war plan isnt about protecting civilians
This is Sarah Palin at her best, taking Obamas plan to bomb Syria apart piece by piece and obliterating it:
So were bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And Im the idiot? Sarah Palin
* President Obama wants America involved in Syrias civil war pitting the antagonistic Assad regime against equally antagonistic Al Qaeda affiliated rebels. But hes not quite sure which side is doing what, what the ultimate end game is, or even whose side we should be on. Havent we learned? WAGs dont work in war.
* We didnt intervene when over 100,000 Syrians were tragically slaughtered by various means, but well now intervene to avenge the tragic deaths of over 1,000 Syrians killed by chemical weapons, though according to the White House were not actually planning to take out the chemical weapons because doing so would require too much of a commitment.
* President Obama wants to do what, exactly? Punish evil acts in the form of a telegraphed air strike on Syria to serve as a deterrent? If our invasion of Iraq wasnt enough of a deterrent to stop evil men from using chemical weapons on their own people, why do we think this will be?
* The world sympathizes with the plight of civilians tragically caught in the crossfire of this internal conflict. But President Obamas advertised war plan (which has given Assad enough of a heads-up that hes reportedly already placing human shields at targeted sites) isnt about protecting civilians, and its not been explained how lobbing U.S. missiles at Syria will help Syrian civilians. Do we really think our actions help either side or stop them from hurting more civilians?
* We have no clear mission in Syria. Theres no explanation of what vital American interests are at stake there today amidst yet another centuries-old internal struggle between violent radical Islamists and a murderous dictatorial regime, and we have no business getting involved anywhere without one. And wheres the legal consent of the peoples representatives? Our allies in Britain have already spoken. They just said no. The American people overwhelmingly agree, and the wisdom of the people must be heeded.
* Our Nobel Peace Prize winning President needs to seek Congressional approval before taking us to war. Its nonsense to argue that, Well, Bush did it. Bull. President Bush received support from both Congress and a coalition of our allies for his wars, ironically the same wars Obama says he vehemently opposed because of lack of proof of Americas vital interests being at stake.
* Bottom line is that this is about President Obama saving political face because of his red line promise regarding chemical weapons.
* As I said before, if we are dangerously uncertain of the outcome and are led into war by a Commander-in-chief who cant recognize that this conflict is pitting Islamic extremists against an authoritarian regime with both sides shouting Allah Akbar at each other, then let Allah sort it out.
- Sarah Palin
You did right or else you will find men talking into their shoulders, and their guns are drawn....or it could zero’s militia, the muslim brother hood plus the hoods from the hood...
If she doesn't want to run for office she should initiate the start of a NEW political party.
There are millions of supporters waiting to move forward if somebody would LEAD.
Sure thing RKBA Democrat, though I already have you on Her List, did you not receive her Ping? If you did not I shall rectify that immediately.
She has a very interesting relationship with the second parties. I seem to recall her husband was a member of the AK independence party at one time. Plus she is on very friendly terms with the Libertarians.
You bet she does, it is what Sarah does best, taking in dispirit groups and uniting them.
Sarah isn't in it for the GOP, you are right we need a Second Party, that is why she attracts Libertarians like me to her side, she walks the walk and talks the talk.
Even if Sarah doesn't hold another political office for her entire life, Ben Franklin held very few too......
“Any combination of those two would thrill my soul and go a long way towards fixing this country. We cant go rino again! They never fix anything and mostly push the same progressive agendas that are destroying this country.”
If by “rino” you mean the gop/’rat uniparty, we’re in complete agreement.
If on the other hand you believe that the gop wing of the uniparty is somehow going to prove redeemable, then I must strenuously disagree. What you see when you look at such gop luminaries as chris christie, john boehner, and mitch mcconnell what you see is the very flower, the heart and soul of the gop wing of the uniparty. They aren’t “republicans in name only,” they are what the gop IS and stands for. That is to say they’re not at all different from the ‘rat wing of the uniparty.
I’ve seen it noted that the gop label is damaged. It’s beyond damaged. It’s become a liability.
My town has lamp posts.
“>>This is why theres a huge libertarian drug-addled, baby-killing, packer/muncher movement going on this country...”
Charming. I bet you’re great fun at birthday parties.
If 0bama has a war plan for attacking Syria, does it include resources to evacuate Syrian civilians from nerve gas released by U.S. bombs hitting stored WMDs near or in cities like Damascus?!
...or this this yet another “winging it” example of 0bama’s foreign policy where after thousands are killed by nerve gas (from Syrian WMDs) released by U.S. bombing raids, that the news media just lies that “No one could have forseen that tragedy”?
You did. My bad. Thanks for putting me on it.
We are in complete agreement. I can literally count the conservatives I trust completely in the GOP on one hand.
RKBA Democrat is on my list as well!
Thanks so much!!!
“If 0bama has a war plan for attacking Syria, does it include resources to evacuate Syrian civilians from nerve gas released by U.S. bombs hitting stored WMDs near or in cities like Damascus?!”
Excellent point. And a thoroughly depressing thought.
But never mind me. According to the media I must be some sort of raaaaaacist. You know. We’re raaaaaacists because we oppose the efforts of a brown skinned demagogue to use OUR military to kill lots of other brown skinned people because they aren’t on the right side of a civil war that is killing lots of brown skinned people.
Or something like that.
I bet youre great fun at birthday parties.
You're right, I meant to say:
This is why theres a huge libertarian drug-addled, baby-killing, disease-ridden, boy-raping whackjob movement going on this country...
I've read the Libertarian Platform.
I would appreciate being added to this list too.
You are now on Sarah's Ever Expanding Ping List!
Shabbat Shalom!
Ping me with Sarah plz
Or, failing that, the ping list will have to do.
You are know officially on Sarah's Awesome Ping List!!
WOO-Hoo!
mykroar and my Laz!
He wants on too!
Never enough Sarah for Sarah's Awesome Supporters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.