Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Ted Cruz the 2016 GOP frontrunner? In Iowa, maybe
Washington Examiner ^ | 08/12/2013 | Byron York

Posted on 08/12/2013 9:08:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

There are no polls showing Ted Cruz leading the 2016 Republican presidential field in the Iowa. A PPP survey last month found Cruz in sixth place in the state, behind Rand Paul, Chris Christie, Paul Ryan, Jeb Bush, and Marco Rubio. But after a particularly well-received appearance at a conservative event in Ames, Iowa over the weekend, there seems little doubt that Cruz, who has been in the U.S. Senate all of eight months, is zooming toward the front of the GOP pack in the nation’s first-voting state.

The gathering, sponsored by the social conservative organization Family Leader, featured appearances by Rick Santorum, winner of the 2012 Republican caucuses, and Cruz, along with billionaire gadfly Donald Trump. From all accounts, Santorum was a popular speaker; the social conservative crowd appreciated not only his positions but the enormous effort he has made to get to know the state of Iowa and its conservative residents.

But Santorum’s welcome could not compare to the wildly enthusiastic reception for Cruz. Joined by his pastor father, Rafael Cruz — he was a big hit, too — the Texas freshman senator wowed the crowd, and then wowed them again.

“The reception for Santorum was appreciative, consistent, and steady,” Bob Vander Plaats, head of the Family Leader and organizer of the event, told me via email. “The anticipation for and reception of Cruz was over the top. He was propelled by an amazing speech by his father, Rafael. All that said, Cruz delivered. Most walked away talking Cruz!”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2016; cruz; iowa; potus; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: ConservativeDude

We’ll see. I’m rooting for Cruz.


21 posted on 08/12/2013 9:56:01 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Obama has nothing to do with Ted Cruz’s own position on his own eligibility. Had there never been an Obama, Ted Cruz is eligible and would explain it the same way, regardless of others’ circumstances.

When you link it with Obama, you’ve gone so far off the track of the issue of “natural born” and what that means, that the issue isn’t even rationally debatable.

I’ll take Ted Cruz on the defintion of “natural born” and his eligibility over the misinformed daily opines, any time, any place.

Just to have fun throwing this in, those who are the most adamant that Cruz is not natural born are actually - if you follow out the “logic” of what they’re claiming - saying that Cruz is not even an American. Not any kind of American.

Even if they don’t use those words, and even if they feign shock and surprise that they are claiming that whether intentionally or not, that IS the end result of their claim he can’t run.

The same claims made against his presidential eligibility would - if true - make him a foreigner. Either Canadian or Cuban - take your silly pick, or the only other option, A MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY.

Whereas Cruz says you’re either a citizen when you are born, or else you must become naturalized later on, to be an American citizen.

Cruz and most legal scholars say being the offspring of an American citizen mother who was of legal age is the controlling factor making him a citizen at birth (natural born).

Not the soil of Canada, not the ancestral land of Cuba, not the naturalized father.

I’m advancing CRUZ’S position on the matter. Will I debate it with the outliers on FR? No, why should I? Cruz can handle it fine, himself, and has plenty of qualified help on the issue.


22 posted on 08/12/2013 9:57:27 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur
I don’t see how Cruz can run since he was born in Canada. In fact, I wasn’t sure about McCain, though he was born on U.S. territory in the Canal Zone.

I don't think where Cruz was born will be an issue. The issue will be one citizen parent which is what he had, versus a two citizen parent requirement.

23 posted on 08/12/2013 10:13:59 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t kid yourself, the circular firing squad hasn’t even loaded their weapons yet.

First, there will be the outcry from conservatives over his birth status, and then the e-GOP will tell us who our canddiates are going to be.

Let’s see...isn’t it about Jebbies turn??


24 posted on 08/12/2013 10:14:22 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Let’s see...isn’t it about Jebbies turn??


25 posted on 08/12/2013 10:20:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Cruz’s mom was born in Delaware. Of course that brings to mind all kinds of Biden jokes, but Biden was actually born in Pennsylvania....


26 posted on 08/12/2013 10:24:29 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Sorry, as exciting as Ted Cruz is for actually having a stiff conservative spine, being born in Canada to only one USA citizen parent, one thing he is not is a natural born Citizen (not that following basic Constitutional law seems to matter to anyone anymore these days), so he can't possibly run for president as a Constitutional conservative (as a dem maybe, but in either case, he would never get my vote).

Now, Sarah Palin - I'd vote for her again in a heartthrob. :-)

27 posted on 08/12/2013 10:38:04 AM PDT by elengr (Benghazi treason: rescue denied, our guys DIED, aka obama s/b tried then fried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is Ted Cruz the 2016 GOP frontrunner?

Yes.. he is in my house!


28 posted on 08/12/2013 10:42:29 AM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Yup...cue up the scab pickers.
29 posted on 08/12/2013 10:48:00 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

STOP IT! He was born in CANADA!


30 posted on 08/12/2013 11:04:24 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

“Oh never mind. Did my research. Appears his Mom was an American citizen at the time. That solves it.”

WHAT? You are uninformed.

HE WAS NOT BORN ON U.S. SOIL, THAT solves it.


31 posted on 08/12/2013 11:07:52 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur

” I wasn’t sure about McCain, though he was born on U.S. territory in the Canal Zone.”

NOOOOOOO he wasn’t The canal zone never was U.S. Territory and McCain was born in the city of Colon, which specifically was not under U.S. control.

OMG, the ignorance of the American people is breathtaking.


32 posted on 08/12/2013 11:11:58 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

” Federal citizenship wasn’t clearly established until the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868”

This is absolute BULL$HIT. The 14th amendment has NOTHING to do with Article II, Section 1, clause 5. “Natural Born Citizen” REQUIREMENT for president. Find the term “Natural Born Citizen” in the 14th amendment and I’ll give you a million dollars.


33 posted on 08/12/2013 11:15:57 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

” So under federal law, Cruz was born an American citizen by virtue of his mother.”

IT IS NOT ABOUT CRUZ BEING A “CITIZEN”!

It’s about the constitutional requirement that the president has to be a “Natural Born Citizen” Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.


34 posted on 08/12/2013 11:19:10 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Posting these LIES twice doesn’t make it any more true.


35 posted on 08/12/2013 11:20:42 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Cruz is ok, but he is funny looking. I’m not a big fan. Even if I were, I want my president to be constitutionally eligible. Call me old fashioned, but I still believe in the constitution and the founders and framers. It’s bad enough that we have had TWO ineligible presidents, let’s not throw out the constitution based on that. Forty-two others were eligible.


36 posted on 08/12/2013 11:29:25 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman; SeekAndFind
He was born in Canada to a Cuban father.

According to the official obamabio, that makes him a natural born Canadian.

The only way there is no controversy about a person's citizenship, resulting due to the circumstances of their birth, is if they are born in the country that both parents are citizens of when that child is born.

This is the ONLY circumstance where all people and nations agree about the person's citizenship. No law or treaty required needed. This has always been so, no matter if citizenship comes from where you were born or if from your Father or if citizenship comes from your mother.

Whatever they or we choose to call the most pure of all citizenship status, born in country to citizen parents (father in their time) is what the FFs meant with the eligibility requirement: "Natural Born Citizen".

What was the FFs' intent for this sole office holder, with command of the military, in needing/requiring this purest level of citizenship? What were they trying to accomplish?

What is meant by the only exception to that NBC status?

They weren't being arbitrary about it. This was a Revolution against the King and they took loyalty and American citizenship seriously. Remember what they did to hero Ben Arnold.

Had we heeded their requirement, we would have avoided both McCain and obama! Instead, we argue like children over the meaning of "is".

37 posted on 08/12/2013 11:29:55 AM PDT by GBA (Our obamanation: Romans 1:18-32)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: elengr

Cruz is, and will be shown to be, right about the meaning of natural born (citizen at birth, not by naturalization).

And yeah, he’ll have to make it without your vote.

Sniff...

Sob!

Not.


38 posted on 08/12/2013 11:36:33 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Inform yourself.

It ain’t the soil.


39 posted on 08/12/2013 11:37:26 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

RE: It’s bad enough that we have had TWO ineligible presidents

Who was the other one?


40 posted on 08/12/2013 11:38:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson