Please Help To Keep The
"Conservative News and Views"
On FR Coming By "Clicking Here"!!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
When we argued that this kind of thing would happen, they said we were crazy. What went wrong?
May these sick POS have their peckers chopped off!
Yep. Here we go. People a hell of a lot smarter than me predicted this...
they all have the right to one behind the ear...I knew this would be next. And why not? Just call it your orientation and you’re beyond questioning.
I would argue that surgical mutilation of young boys and girls (transgenders) is more grotesque — and we’ve already crossed that bridge. Removing legal barriers that currently block older men from molesting young children would seem quite easy now.
And the people into necrophilia, bestiality, orgies - any and every perversion you can think of (and probably several none of us would come up with) are lining up for their “rights” to express their preferences.
It isn't!
They're all a bunch of child molesting whack-jobs. The fags just prefer boys.
The entire article is here:
http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=11517
Northern Colorado Gazette
Everyone should read the whole thing. It’s quite skin crawling.
This will be a huge battle among libertarians, it is an internal fight that they have not firmed up on yet.
See excerpt from Time magazine below, from 2008
“Case in point: last month’s child-porn-gate.
The fracas started with Mary J. Ruwart, the candidate with perhaps the deepest, purest libertarian roots (her rejection of government is so complete that some party moderates have begun warning of the anarchical dangers of “Ruwarchy”). In April, a rival called her out for her thoughts in a 1999 book called Short Answers to the Tough Questions. “Children who willingly participate in sexual acts have the right to make that decision as well, even if it’s distasteful to us personally,” Ruwart wrote. “When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.”
Ruwart’s is a classic libertarian take — a defense of free will (even for “child performers”) and an attack on government prohibitions of any kind. It’s also political poison. As libertarian blogger Steve Newton put it, Ruwart and her allies run the risk of turning the party into “the poster child for NAMBLA and the aluminum hat brigade.”
The party’s executive director, Shane Cory, saw the danger as well, and rushed out a press release titled, “Libertarians call for increased communication to combat child pornography.” Cory was attacked by hardliners who saw the release as an endorsement of increased federal prosecuting power. The party refused to vote on a resolution asking states to strongly enforce existing child porn laws. Cory resigned in protest, depriving a party in the midst of what may be its most promising election season of one of its most able organizers and fund raisers. But for many libertarian faithful, adherence to the most rigid of principles always trumps practical considerations about how those principles might be more broadly observed.
That rigidity has long been libertarianism’s greatest asset. If the Democratic and Republican parties have any ideology, it’s an ideology of power — their policies shift and twist in the wind according to what they think will appeal to the biggest slice of the electorate. Libertarians have no power, but they have consistency and principle.”
Ping
There are both moral and biological imperatives demanding the protection of our young. We are wishing away the moral strictures against pedophilia but the biological results of a lack of protection are ugly and often fatal. We have that “Kill the twisted freak,” response for a reason. The end product of the pedophile is a sad, damaged creature, often incapable of themselves being a parent. It takes amazing strength for a child to overcome perversion.
...unexpectedly...
We all knew this was coming.
Is this another example of what I kept being told was a slippery slope “fallacy”?
Buy more ammo!!
Of course. Homos don’t get dibs on the “born that way” BS.