Posted on 07/12/2013 4:52:55 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 12th, is DAY #24 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday the prosecution provide closing arguments (Summary: http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/states-closing-argument-two-hours-of-raising-doubt).
Today the defense attorney, Mark O’Mara will present his closing argument. Then the prosecution rebuttal.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Neither did Martin, and he is now dead.
Are lawyers allowed to LIE during closing arguments without repercussions?
sometimes when someone tries to use the emotional thing with me, I start softly signing:
I could while away the hours
conferrin’ with the flowers
consulting with the rain
de de de dettle le deet
LOLOLOL.
The Mike Tyson defense. Desiree Washington should have stayed in her car.
And I guess he wanted to shoot him at the last possible moment before he was knocked unconscious! And he wanted to shoot him minutes before the police that he called would show up! And he wanted to shoot him in front of a neighbors townhouse, rather than shooting him where no one else might see it.
Makes sense to me!
How do you know he never circled his car —
You certainly do have a brain.
But you are also atypical when it comes to women and emotion. The big reason why there’s always a gender gap in Presidential elections is because the Dems are so good at appealing to emotion rather than logic.
Someone needs to tell Guy - “Your time is up”
Of course. They're lawyers.
So all the guess, assume, presume etc, I thought it was the job of the state to present proof. To eliminate the doubt! Ugh, I can’t stand the lying, the upside nature of this entire case! Thanks for the count, it’s insane!
“Don’t be a vigilante”
That’s exactly what he’s asking the jury to be.
attacking stand your ground.
this is to enable the civil suit.
The city and state are afraid of a civil suit from all sides.
He is misrepresenting stand your ground.
In that case, I would take the Richmond-San Rafael bridge over to the East Bay and take the 880 to Hwy 17 down to Santa Cruz - avoid SF at all costs.
All the rest have to say to the dingbat is "are you absolutely sure he's guilty. Because if you have a reasonable doubt, we've got to say, not guilty."
Furthermore, they could say, "show us the evidence you are using to come to the absolutely guilty conclusion."
And of course, there isn't any.
Seems to me that this creep Guy is saying and doing whatever he needs for just ONE sympathetic juror to make a hung jury. I think they realize their case is toast.
universal constant the government HATES individualism.
MOM put the jury into contemplative, receptive mindframe that appealed to their sense of honor; now this idiot’s confronting them, essentially calling them stupid for being hypnotized by MOM. This causes jurywomen to recoil, not consider what he’s hurling at them in his fear of losing.
Kinda like when opinion-shapers on FR try to hold you down and force you what to think and believe... it backfires.
I think this is why this particular case has me more fearful of possible rioting...my husband sometimes goes to Orlando and has to spend the night...Reginald denny is not far from my mind right now. I’m hangin on to hopeful
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.