Posted on 07/09/2013 4:51:37 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
More feminine today.
It comes down to the last 3:16 seconds.
The state wants a long chase from a Trayvon follower followed by a short beatdown and a shot.
The purpose of Dr Rao’s one punch injury was to shorten beatdown so as to lengthen the chase.
But if the beatdown lasted longer then there was no time for a chase.
BWAHAHAHAHA! You’ve got it! He put his FACE on upside down!
rofl
“Were those 14 screams all derived from the 45 second 911 call??”
Chip,,,, I wish I could remember, but, as I mentioned, info overload! Between here and the Treehouse,,,, just so much to try and remember! I could be completely wrong.
We aren’t talking about nullification. We are talking about reducing charges, for instance from second degree to manslaughter. It cannot be done in Florida or New York. Jury nullification amounts to the same thing, all or nothing.
I was thinking that it is a good thing that the jury does not have that option in this case because the reduced charges would give the jury a way to please the press and some of the public without the government really proving their case.
Not Casablanca but certainly does resemble....Bonfire of the Vanties
I am SHOCKED this hearing has gone on for this long.
Gawd this prosecutor is a whiney little twirp. We all knew one just like him in middle school.
this is just stringing them together....
Watching his mouth talk makes me sick.
I keep thinking everyone there must be far overdue for a potty break and very hungry by now!
It would have been over if the prosecution was organized and wasn’t babbling as he goes
I believe Dweeb does love to hear himself talk... {{{Yaaaaawwwwwwwnnnnnn}}}
What, you you don’t find his dopy little pout endearing?
I have to ask. Since this animation is merely a reenactment of events from testimony the jury has already heard....
is this ‘on and on BS’ really worth it? Is it really going to help the Defense’s case enough to make this “into the night” argument worthwhile. And if so, could someone please explain HOW and WHY?
Angela Corey looks like she is ready to fall off her chair.
>> Is it really going to help the Defenses case enough to make this into the night argument worthwhile.
MoM apparently thinks so. That’s enough for me.
I couldn’t agree more. I wish the defense would stand up and say...”Your Honor, for cryin’ out loud, just forget it so he will shut the freak up!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.