Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS: same-sex marriage decisions - Live Thread (Decisions at 97, 194, & 217)
Free Republic | 06/26/2013 | BuckeyeTexan

Posted on 06/25/2013 9:54:04 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

At 10:00 AM Wednesday, the Supreme Court will deliver its final decisions of this term. We can expect decisions on both same-sex marriage cases.

California Proposition 8: Hollingsworth v. Perry

In November 2008, 52.3 percent of California voters approved Proposition 8, which added language to the California Constitution that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. In May 2009, a California District Court ruled that Proposition 8 violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and temporarily prohibited its enforcement, and the Ninth Circuit agreed, affirming the District Court’s ruling. The United States Supreme Court will now consider whether a state can define marriage solely as the union of a man and a woman, in addition to considering whether the proponents of Proposition 8 have standing to bring suit in federal court. The Court’s ruling will implicate the rights of gay men and lesbians, the role of the government in structuring family and society, and the relationship between the institution of marriage and religion and morality.

Defense of Marriage Act: United States v. Windsor

Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer married in Toronto in 2007 where same-sex marriages were legal. At the time of Spyer’s death, the state of New York recognized the couple’s marriage. However, the IRS denied Windsor use of a spousal estate tax exception on the ground that, under the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), the federal government did not recognize same-sex marriages for the purpose of federal benefits. The Supreme Court is now being asked to decide DOMA’s Constitutionality. The Obama Administration is not defending DOMA, so a Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (“BLAG”) from the House of Representatives is doing so, arguing that DOMA is rationally related to the legitimate government objective of providing a uniform definition of marriage for federal benefits purposes. The Obama administration counters that the use of sexual orientation to decide who gets benefits is a suspect classification that deserves higher scrutiny. Under that level of higher scrutiny, the Obama administration argues that DOMA is impermissible. This case can affect what role the federal government can play in defining marriage and who in the federal government can defend the government’s laws. Not only could this case provide large tax savings to Ms. Windsor herself, but it can also make federal benefits available to other same-sex couples who are legally married under the laws of their state.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doma; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; notbreakingnews; obamanation; prop8; ruling; samesexmarriage; scotus; ursulathevk; vanity; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-459 next last
To: MarkRegal05

T minus 10 minutes.


81 posted on 06/26/2013 6:50:44 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

It feels like we are in the last moments of America.


82 posted on 06/26/2013 6:52:19 AM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
If individuals and Mosques, and Mormons, and gay goat churches all decide for themselves what legal marriage is, then the marriage war is lost,

No, then they will have to answer to the Supreme Judge, and I think their policies on marriage at that point will be mere evidence in the case against them rather than the issue at hand.

besides, government or a common authority always has to have laws dealing with marriage, it always has.

So the answer is to hand the FedGov more power? No, that's stupid.
Moreover, even if you put the definition of marriage as a Constitutional amendment they would likely ignore it (just look at the Bill of Rights) — it is actually advantageous to the homosexual agenda to have marriage defined in the Courts or in the Statutory Laws, the former because it's easy to pervert (given the religious reverence given to precedence, along with the cherry-picking) and the latter because that can more-easily be changed (like by sneaking in an amending clause to some piece of federal legislation).

As an example of the courts ignoring the law, there is this story of a photographer successfully sued because they refused to provide services to a homosexual wedding. Why is this an issue? Because the New Mexico State Constitution says this:

Art II, Sec. 11. [Freedom of religion.]
Every man shall be free to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and no person shall ever be molested or denied any civil or political right or privilege on account of his religious opinion or mode of religious worship. No person shall be required to attend any place of worship or support any religious sect or denomination; nor shall any preference be given by law to any religious denomination or mode of worship.

So, if the State can utterly ignore its own Law, and the Federal Government routinely does the same, then where is the good in making this law? There is none, there is only hurt down that road.

83 posted on 06/26/2013 6:53:41 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HokieMom
It feels like we are in the last moments of America.

It sure feels like we could be.

84 posted on 06/26/2013 6:58:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

From your lips to god’s ears!


85 posted on 06/26/2013 6:58:35 AM PDT by MarkRegal05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I think the graphic should be labeled “The road to Sodom and Gomorrah”.
86 posted on 06/26/2013 6:59:06 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
There's a killing to be made from gay divorce.

That's right and gay divorce will be a priority after DOMA's defeat. Because that's when same-sex couples find out that Married Filing Separately is their only choice in splitsville until they are divorced or legally separated.

87 posted on 06/26/2013 6:59:18 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HokieMom

But, I will say this: That even if the Supreme Court rules today that up is down, up will remain up. And, if We the People will then rise up against this court that has de-legitimized itself, there is still hope.


88 posted on 06/26/2013 7:00:23 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

0 Hour.


89 posted on 06/26/2013 7:00:45 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I’m going for my MRI on my knee this morning. Waiting for this ruling.


90 posted on 06/26/2013 7:01:23 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: HokieMom
It feels like we are in the last moments of America.
Yes, I think you are correct. If we on Free Republic all pray for one another, it will help... ♥
91 posted on 06/26/2013 7:01:37 AM PDT by mlizzy (If people spent an hour a week in Eucharistic adoration, abortion would be ended. --Mother Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew
One sad reason the lunk-headed federal government gets involved in these things is people on the Right who don't like what others are doing try to use the federal government to force what they think on others.

This is true, and likely one of the reasons people call the GOP and conservatives the party of stupid: for it is a truly stupid person who never considers how might the law I am proposing be used against me?.

And as we all know that sword cuts both ways and eventually cuts all of us out of our God-given liberties.

Bravo! — That is the realization that is missing.

Individual and states' rights and freedoms are the cornerstone of the freest constitutional republic the world has ever seen. Hard to keep it (as Benjamin Franklin once implied) because freedom doesn't always go our way, but in the long run, a free society is the healthiest and happiest on earth. (Besides, we can always move to another state [like we are right now] that lines up closer to our values.)

Precisely! (Good luck on the move, BTW.) Much of the problem we have now is because most people believe that the FedGov is [utterly] superior to the States, just read this article; it frames things as a First Amendment issue — it is not, the First is binding on only Congress (if you claim that the 14th Amendment incorporation causes it to apply against States, then you are asserting that it is a process which magically changes the text as it passes through) — the correct framing would be in Article II, Section 11 of the New Mexico Constitution:

Every man shall be free to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and no person shall ever be molested or denied any civil or political right or privilege on account of his religious opinion or mode of religious worship. No person shall be required to attend any place of worship or support any religious sect or denomination; nor shall any preference be given by law to any religious denomination or mode of worship.

92 posted on 06/26/2013 7:02:54 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

10:01

Amy Howe:
Here’s Lyle with the first opinion. It’s DOMA
10:02

Amy Howe:
5-4 per Kennedy.
10:02

Amy Howe:
Roberts dissents. Scalia dissents. Equal protection.
10:02

Amy Howe:
Scalia is joined by Thomas, Chief joins in part.
10:02

Amy Howe:
Alito dissents, joined by Thomas in part.
10:03

Amy Howe:
DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.


93 posted on 06/26/2013 7:03:16 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

DOMA repealed 5-4 Kenny sides with libs.


94 posted on 06/26/2013 7:03:31 AM PDT by JerseyRepub (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy

DOMA is down.

“DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.”


95 posted on 06/26/2013 7:03:45 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

How soon before gay marriage is mandatory.


96 posted on 06/26/2013 7:04:45 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If illegal aliens voted (R), then the Dems would create the tightest border security in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ..
U.S. v. Windsor DOMA is unconstitutional and struck down by 5-4 decsion.
97 posted on 06/26/2013 7:04:53 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Next up, animals and harems - it’s all good says SCOTUS.


98 posted on 06/26/2013 7:05:22 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

What about prop 8?


99 posted on 06/26/2013 7:05:38 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Lee, and Sen Rand Paul are my adoptive Senators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I expected that one... now the issue pertaining to the states will be interesting...


100 posted on 06/26/2013 7:05:56 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 441-459 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson