Posted on 06/17/2013 7:59:40 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said if he were president, he would have intervened in Syria much sooner than President Obama did to identify the reasonable rebels opposed to the regime of President Basher Assad.
It behooved us to kind of identify whether there was any elements there within Syria fighting against Assad that we could work withreasonable people that wouldnt carry out human rights violations and could be part of building a new Syria. We failed to do that, Rubio told Jonathan Karl on ABC News This Week.
Obama announced this week that the Assad regime had crossed the red line and the U.S. now has conclusive evidence the country used chemical weapons.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
“...said if he were president, he would have intervened in Syria much sooner than President Obama did.”
Not that I was planning on sending you any money in 2016 anyway, but my checkbook just closed a little tighter where you are concerned, Marco.
I believe Rubio describes himself as conservative. What exactly about him might be conservative I wonder - does he wear y-fronts?
“And if this country is to survive, you wont ever be in charge you Amnesty Pimp!”
Perhaps he planning on sending the ILLEGALS to fight there. If they won’t go, then he sends them back to their home countries. (See, I’m not just pickin’ on the mexicans)
The GOPe tends not to roll this way, but my hope is that there’s a flood of big RINO egos insisting on running in the same primary in 2016, so that our one true and viable conservative (Palin?) has the advantage of a split RINO vote.
Usually, it is the conservative egos—Santorum, Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, Perry—who fall for the GOPe bait and crowd into the field together.
Oh, and after Rove and his crew lamented the advantage Palin could have in 2012 as the only female in the primary, they managed to lure Bachmann in.
If Palin actually makes a run in 2016, who will they try to put in to diffuse that supposed advantage? My guess is one or both of the prominent, early-primary state, GOP women they have: Nikki Haley and/or Kelly Ayotte.
No, just the smell of a presidential run.
Probably because THERE AREN'T ANY. 'Reasonable' and 'Muslim' are a contradiction in terms.
Except that Palin never said that she wouldn't have intervened or that she wouldn't have supported getting involved in Syria. She just didn't support doing it while Obama was running the show.
The Constitution sets the senate term at 6 years. There is nothing in it that says '6 years unless...'. Recall of a Senator is unconstitutional. The 10th Amendment doesn't apply.
Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and Wisconsin are the states with some manner of recall availability on their books.
State officials only.
Where is recall of a US senator unconstitutional?
Article II, Section 4: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Constitutionally that is the only way to remove a Senator or any other federal office-holder.
I do not see the word “only” in that clause.
The dude can’t handle the subjunctive tense, and yet he’s supposed to be one of our great orators?
Marco Rubio
born May 28, 1971 in Miami, FL
Parents were
Mario Rubio born in Cuba, naturalized Nov. 5, 1975.
Oria Garcia born in Cuba, naturalized Nov. 5, 1975.
Parents were NOT US Citizens at the time of his birth.
Marco Rubio is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
Marco's status is the same as that of Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama, who is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
*facepalm*
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.The others are not black and white definitions, like this one is. Just because no deviation has had precedent does not mean it is illegal or unconstitutional; that is why we have a Tenth Amendment. (And no, the eighteen states recall processes apply to US Senators, not just state Senators.)
No that’s the type of out of the box thinking I go for. LOL
We have always sent someone else’s son to die. That’s nothing new. We just need to make sure there is a valid reason to do so.
By intervening in Egypt, we guarantee one of our enemies will win. Better to allow them to kill each other off and stay out of it.
Best we could hope for here is a stalemate, them wearing each other down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.