Skip to comments.
Air Force 'Notice to Airmen' Warns Them Not to Read NSA Data-Mining and Related Stories
NewsBusters ^
Posted on 06/10/2013 10:32:05 PM PDT by chessplayer
In a story which I can attest is accurate, Gina Loudon at WND.com, formerly WorldNetDaily, reports that the Air Force's 624th Operations Center is warning airmen not to look at the news.
That's not exactly what they're saying, but they might as well be. What the "Notice to Airmen" says is that "Users are not to use AF NIPRNET systems to access the Verizon phone records collection and other related news stories because the action could constitute a Classified Message Incident." It's currently pretty hard to go to a news site without seeing a blurb on a "related story," given how many "related stories" there are which go way beyond Verizon to nine tech companies, 50 other companies, Edward Snowden, White House, congressional and bureaucrats' responses, etc.
The Air Force memo effectively keeps service members from accessing Drudge, the New York Times, the Associated Press, and virtually every other national and international news site's home page for the next several days -- if not weeks and months, at the rate things are going.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airforce; benghazi; fastandfurious; impeachnow; irs; nsa; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: chessplayer
This was covered yesterday... a NOTAM is an FAA-issued instruction to civilian pilots.
2
posted on
06/10/2013 10:42:03 PM PDT
by
Rodamala
To: chessplayer
This is crap. As in Barbara Streisand.
3
posted on
06/10/2013 10:45:47 PM PDT
by
JaguarXKE
(1973: Reporters investigate All the President's Men. 2013: Reporters ARE all the President's men)
To: Rodamala
Life imitating art:
4
posted on
06/10/2013 10:49:57 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: chessplayer
We got the notice as well in my shop. The data released is still classified, so if you download it to your unclassified computer, you've caused an incident. Just because the data has been made public doesn't mean it is declassified. As a cleared employee, you are only permitted access to data with a "need to know" and stored on a system cleared to that level. It's not worth losing your clearance.
5
posted on
06/10/2013 10:58:47 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: chessplayer
6
posted on
06/10/2013 11:04:45 PM PDT
by
TheGunny
To: chessplayer
If youi're Christian and have NOT gotten out of the military akready, you'd better get out NOW, before it's too late.
God's wrath is coming!
7
posted on
06/10/2013 11:07:59 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Myrddin
We got the notice as well in my shop. The data released is still classified, so if you download it to your unclassified computer, you've caused an incident. Just because the data has been made public doesn't mean it is declassified. As a cleared employee, you are only permitted access to data with a "need to know" and stored on a system cleared to that level. It's not worth losing your clearance. But it's not the data — it's the stories [about it] too.
8
posted on
06/10/2013 11:08:33 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: chessplayer
If youi're Christian and have NOT gotten out of the military already, you'd better get out NOW, before it's too late.
God's wrath is coming!
9
posted on
06/10/2013 11:08:39 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Myrddin
It may be deemed as still ‘classified’ but the reality is thast it is no logner classified- it is now public knowledge- right or wrong- The public is aware of the material, but our soldeirs who are cited with protectign this coutnry are not to be made aware of what is now material that hte public is aware of? Doesn’t make sense-
10
posted on
06/11/2013 12:01:36 AM PDT
by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: TheGunny
WND is garbage!
//////////////////
Correct: I, apparently as you also do, prefer to rely on the trustworthy Rachel Maddow for my news. /sarc
11
posted on
06/11/2013 2:01:40 AM PDT
by
man_in_tx
(Blowback (Faithfully farting twowards Mecca five times daily).)
To: CottShop
The entire DoD was instructed on this by a 7 June memo from DepSecDef. Downloads of the classified files to the unclassified “low side” or NIPRNET will constitute a data spill that will have to be manually removed from every device that accessed the data. Giant PITA with no practical benefits. Silly.
TC
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
13
posted on
06/11/2013 4:11:35 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
To: chessplayer
Why do people feel they can use the internet for anything but working at work. Looking at the news at work should be illegal. The NIPR Net is a government owned system. Nobody should be reading the news at work.
14
posted on
06/11/2013 4:12:48 AM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
To: napscoordinator
Looking at the news at work should be illegal. Because there are never enough laws.
Show me the man and I'll find you the crime
Lavrentiy Beria
15
posted on
06/11/2013 4:20:02 AM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
To: Myrddin
Yes, It is about the classified information and only about the classified.
This isn’t about Obama, it isn’t about controlling what the servicemen see.
The same rule was invoked under Bush. It doesn’t matter if the classified information has become public, it is still classified. BTW: A service member must make a report to their commander if a member of their family downloads classified onto a home computer. This is treated very seriously.
16
posted on
06/11/2013 4:24:13 AM PDT
by
RadiationRomeo
(Step into my mind and glimpse the madness that is me)
To: napscoordinator
Looking at the news at work should be illegal. What if I'm self employed?
To: RadiationRomeo
This says not to read STORIES about it.
This is an attempt to put blinders on Obama’s KILL SQUADS.
To: man_in_tx
They are both equally reliable news outlets. Nothing more than a bunch of sensationalists begging for folks to digest the tripe they are serving up for consumption.
19
posted on
06/11/2013 4:53:06 AM PDT
by
TheGunny
20
posted on
06/11/2013 7:31:03 AM PDT
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson