Posted on 06/10/2013 8:14:41 AM PDT by gethimoutofthehouse
A group of intelligence officials were overheard yesterday discussing how the National Security Agency worker who leaked sensitive documents to a reporter last week should be 'disappeared.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
“Something isnt setting right with these new revelations and an administration that has a history of deflecting, distracting, demeaning, etc.”
An interesting thought—set this guy up for the fall while handing over even more state secrets to the real party.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Tell us what parts of PRISM adhere to that?
If the government isn’t doing something wrong, why are they so pissed that Snowden told the world what the government is doing...that isn’t wrong?
It is a possiblity that the government wanted this out. Now that they see a majority of Americans are willing to give up liberties for security, they know just how far they can go.
I assume the Prism search warrant said:
Probable cause: Someone in the United States is always breaking the law, and unlimited search warrants might help in finding that person.
Place to be searched: United States of America, including but not limited to all electronic communications originating/terminating/transiting in or through one or more of the 57 states.
Persons or things to be seized: One or more US or foreign citizens, and/or the entire body of their written and electronic communications.
Constitutional Law "Professor" Obama sees nothing wrong with that. It's consistent with the Living Constitution, which means only what the liberal wing of the Democrat Party wants it to mean.
Why are we getting our “real” news from UK papers or the BBC to find out WTH is going on in America? Something doesn’t smell right here.
And this quote is particularly interesting in regards to Breitbart. Perhaps, it's time to open an investigation into his death.
“*They said both the leaker and Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald, who broke the story, should be ‘disappeared’”
They have the means to do it. It’s no joke.
Translation: what impending scandal is Obama hiding this time? What are the media in America about to find out?
Translation: What scandal are American reporters on the verge of uncovering so that they can cover up something major?
I share your concerns. I am at the point where I am waiting for the Weather Channel to do a show on When the Weather Changed History—not about D-Day but about the day that Obama’s spying on Americans was wiped out, literally, by a change of weather. It shoud come soon!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.