Posted on 06/03/2013 4:44:35 AM PDT by don-o
The terrorist attack in Benghazi is far more disturbing than previously thought. Although it has not been reported in the U.S. media, the possibility exists that the Egyptian government may have played an operational role in the attack. YouTube videos of the terrorist strike raise a serious problem that only an Arabic speaker would detect: some of the terrorists are speaking in the Egyptian dialect of the Arabic language.
Indeed, one of the videos shot with a cell phone of one of the attackers emerged around the time four Americans were killed. It shows a mob approaching the American compound under siege, clearly telling the terrorists in the dialect of Upper Egypt: Mahadesh, mahadesh yermi, Dr. Morsi ba`atna which translates to: Dont shoot, dont shoot, Dr. Morsi sent us.
The words Mahadesh yermi for dont shoot are characteristically spoken in Egyptian Arabic, while Libyans from Benghazi would say, Matermey for dont shoot.
Dr. Morsi refers, of course, to president Mohamed Morsi of Egypt. The name Morsi is Egyptian and does not exist in any other Arabic speaking country.
The Egyptian regimes connection to Benghazi also helps explain why it denied U.S. the ability to interrogate Abo Ahmed, an Egyptian suspect in the terrorist attack.
According to a Fox News report, Abo Ahmed had contacted Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri in late 2012, asking to establish a base in Libya to take advantage of the conditions in Libya after the revolution in order to buy weapons and attract foreign fighters.
Egyptian media demanded an explanation from the Egyptian regime on why Morsis name was mentioned by jihadists during the attack. This question went unanswered, and until now there has been no word of this issue in English-language media.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
I reject that theory. Way too much over reach downside - the swap would not have redounded well for Obama.
Dr. Morsi was camouflaged as an Egyptian George Washington by Hillary and Obama. Actually, he is just another jihadi Muslim bent on bringing his part of the Islamic caliphate to fruition. Nice work, media traitors.
I agree - he’s got to get it right. There is actually a lot of stuff going on; Issa questioned those two low-level IRS people behind closed doors last week and they pretty much spilled the beans. They’re afraid of jail.
So he’s keeping up the heat while at the same time methodically tracing all the threads back to their common origin.
We can’t have the drama of high-level hearings every day, because this is more than a who-dun-it drama. The future of our country and our own lives depend on this. A tall order.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Issa and Company have to get it right, they have to get it right the first time, and they have to be so right theres absolutely no wiggle room.
_______
I agree.
note the date...June 29, 2012
‘Morsi Promises to Free ‘Blind Sheik’ from U.S. Prison’
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303561504577497053026356034.html#articleTabs%3Darticle
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/29/mohamed-morsi-sheikh-us
This one actually displays content of Morsi’s words. Red meat to the crowd. I still can’t buy that Obama is THAT stupid. I could be wrong.
And the NY Times report of the same speech
Eh, anybody can post a live thread when it comes right down to it. I think the news over the weekend was more drip drip drip (which suits me fine) than Perry Mason “aha!”, FWIW.
One of the problems with having a Muslim in the White House is that the US has become heavily involved in intra-Muslim fights. That is, it seems to me that generally Barry is backing the Muslim Brotherhood and the faction of Islam that it represents. The MB, in turn, forms alliances with other Muslim groups or, equally, attacks them, depending on what it thinks will do most harm to its enemies and help it to consolidate its power.
Even AQ is useful in this at times, if it’s in a place where there is little or no MB presence, and I think a lot of Obama’s “surgical strikes” on representatives of the various AQ rival factions were actually part of this policy of consolidating that particular group under one leadership that could then work with Obama and the MB to impose Islamic law throughout the world.
I don’t think they intended to kidnap Stevens, btw, much less try to exchange him for the Blind Sheik. I suspect that Obama will simply send the latter to Egypt as a “humanitarian gesture” before too long, and nobody will be able to do anthing about it.
I think they actually wanted to kill Stevens, either because he was an American and they wanted to the world to see how weak we would be in our response, or because they wanted to get the weapons that were supposedly being stored nearby. A plot to kidnap him and exchange him would be both too complicated and unnecessary.
Columbo—— bumbling demeanor and Sherlock Holmesian powers of deduction, disarmingly polite .
It's not the stupidity; it's the arrogance. He's that arrogant, IMO. They all are. After all, they've been planning this Marxist revolutionary takeover for years, so they've had plenty of planning time. I always DID wonder how long ago that obamacare package sat in someone's desk drawer, awaiting for the right time...
btt
If one just knows a little about the muzzies and how they operates, the kidnapping as Admiral Lyon describes is the MOST likely scenario!
Skank Killary, on order from Barry, sent Amb. Stevens to an unprotected, OR protected by cheap muzzie = sympathetic of Jihad to Benghazi on or before anniversary of 9/11!!
Morsi wanted the Blind sheik released and Barry has NO scruples of playing that kind of game (Andrew Breitbart and others) or killing the Navy Seals or to make a “killing” October surprise at the election time. With patsies as Petreus, Panetta from CIA, everything is possible under the rug.” The faked OBL operation was created around the b.c. issue!!!
Saturday it was said there were 25+ CIAs in the compound at Benghazi, hello???
That is very true.
Interesting.
I hope this info does not get lost amongst all the other scandals.
Same here. We have a precious few in the Congress who we are counting on. But, they are so few and spread so thin, confidence is not high.
I know. We’ll just have to re-double our prayers.
Brrr
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.