Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WH: 'Offensive' to Question Obama's Actions During Benghazi
Breitbart ^ | 5/19/13 | staff

Posted on 05/19/2013 8:41:38 AM PDT by Nachum

Going on the offensive about President Obama’s mysterious whereabouts during the Benghazi terrorist attacks of September 11, 2012 that resulted in the deaths of four Americans including Ambassador Chris Stevens, White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said it was “offensive” for anyone to question whether the White House could have done more. The assertion “from Republicans” that Obama was not responsive enough during the attack, said Pfeiffer, is “offensive.”

“The premise of [the question on Obama’s whereabouts],” Pfeiffer explained, “is that somehow there was something that could have been done differently and would have changed the outcome here. The accountability review board has looked at this, people have looked at it.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; coverup; libya; obamas; obamasfault; offensive; question
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: ripley

“As they say in criminal circles, the best defense is an offense”

Normally yes. If we had competent people on our side these fake offense moves could be effectively exposed and make them look far worse than if they just fessed up. They are now digging themselves deeper into a hole. They could get away with it given our sides incompetence.


61 posted on 05/19/2013 10:06:52 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Dan Pfeiffer......prep school pants-wetter.


62 posted on 05/19/2013 10:11:23 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the808bass

Here’s what happened: O gave the order to stand down - repeatedly! Why on earth can’t someone ask him or his hacks: Why did O give the order to stand down?? It assumes the truth and forces a denial or an answer. Forget the video, the Vegas trip,etc. Our military has to know he gave the order, no?


63 posted on 05/19/2013 10:23:32 AM PDT by Dansong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

offensive??

wait until he hears my statements on the rest of his regime


64 posted on 05/19/2013 10:25:47 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

hmm... they’re awfully sensitive about where he was.

i’d bet he was with a boy toy


65 posted on 05/19/2013 10:26:48 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Pfeiffer simply is regurgitating the words uttered by his boss on previous occasions. Remember the debates?


66 posted on 05/19/2013 10:28:48 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Pfeiffer, you are offensive and your boss is even more so.


67 posted on 05/19/2013 10:39:48 AM PDT by hummingbird (So much conspiracy and not enough time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I am sure someone already said it, (havne’t read all the comments yet) -

Compare that to Bush’s 15 min ‘my pet goat’ moment that Libs kept sreeching ever since 2001.


68 posted on 05/19/2013 10:40:36 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
The Jay Carney card from the other day had a lot of Benghazi-related spots on it. Next time it comes up I'm sure we can fit it in there. ("I appreciate your question" is probably a goner.)

 photo whpbbingo_zpsc1609a44.jpg

And here's the new IRSghazi bingo card for next week. Pfeiffer parroted a few talking points today at least a half dozen times per show -- "30-day top-down review", "find those responsible, accountable", and the leftist chorus is talking at every opportunity about changing 501c (to eliminate Karl Rove's site, of course), so I've put them in.

 photo irsbingo_zps85bf1d7c.jpg

69 posted on 05/19/2013 10:54:00 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

They weigh the consequences in negative public reaction against their desired results. “Yeah, we broke the law but we won the election.”


70 posted on 05/19/2013 11:00:49 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

Dead men don’t talk.


71 posted on 05/19/2013 11:04:56 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride

OH yeah, I hear that too, she “disrespected” my role as father.............esp when they haven’t bothered to marry the mother.


72 posted on 05/19/2013 11:27:17 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride

Then I advise them their role as father is to improve that child’s life


73 posted on 05/19/2013 11:32:25 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

“They could get away with it given our sides’ incompetence.”

It’s amazing how they sometimes seem cowed by the arrogance, audacity and impertinence of the Progressive
witnesses before their committees.

Absolutely amazing.

One hopes that they can gain the intestinal fortitude to confront these people effectively.

IMHO


74 posted on 05/19/2013 11:34:04 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Translated - lay off or we’ll send the irs after you.


75 posted on 05/19/2013 11:37:39 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Pi$$ed off yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Listening to this White House is like talking to my dog.

First, he shares at me wagging his tail. Then he sits down. The he lays down. Then he goes and sits in his crate. Then he stands and wags his tail at me.

He just rotates through his learned responses.

First, it's offensive. Then it's the Republican playbook. Then it's a minor detail. Then it's old news. Then it's racist. Then it's offensive.

-PJ

76 posted on 05/19/2013 11:46:40 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dansong

Here’s what happened: O gave the order to stand down - repeatedly! Why on earth can’t someone ask him or his hacks: Why did O give the order to stand down?? It assumes the truth and forces a denial or an answer. Forget the video, the Vegas trip,etc. Our military has to know he gave the order, no?


Agree. Talking points are important, but the Cross Border Authorization, and
stand down orders are the Elephant in the Corner.


77 posted on 05/20/2013 4:59:35 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

78 posted on 05/20/2013 5:15:02 AM PDT by McGruff (It's not the crime it's the cover-up someone once said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said it was “offensive” for anyone to question whether the White House could have done more.

Dan you, 0bama and his entire regime is offensive to life, liberty, and prosperity.

So Dan, you don't want us to question the emperor who has no clothes? Ok, I won't question him. I'll just say fu@k you, 0bama and the entire regime plus the horses they rode in on.

How's that, Dan?

5.56mm

79 posted on 05/20/2013 5:30:02 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

That just proves it. Obama was off having a tryst with his “body man” during the Benghazi attack,

and it’s “offensive” to imply that homosexual behavior is wrong.


80 posted on 05/20/2013 5:32:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson