Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota poised to become 12th state to adopt same-sex marriage [Sodomy Celebrated]
Reuters ^ | 5/13/13 | Dave Bailey

Posted on 05/13/2013 3:27:00 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

The Minnesota Senate is expected to give final approval on Monday to a bill that would make the state the 12th in the United States to allow same-sex couples to marry and only the second in the Midwest.

Leaders in the Senate, where Democrats hold a 39-28 majority, have said they believe they have the support to approve a bill legalizing gay marriage. They set a vote for Monday on the measure that members of the state House approved last week.

Democratic Governor Mark Dayton has said he would sign the bill, which would make Minnesota the third state this month to legalize gay marriage after Rhode Island and Delaware. The law would take effect August 1.

(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: democrats; gaystapo; homofascism; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; liberalagenda; perversion; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Applause from the media and from the immoral Democrat party (but I repeat myself) as sodomy is being forced on society.
1 posted on 05/13/2013 3:27:00 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
 photo Freestates_zps73b38531.jpg
2 posted on 05/13/2013 3:29:21 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

All of the local Somali’s are, no doubt,excited beyond belief


3 posted on 05/13/2013 3:39:05 AM PDT by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Every day, I thank God that I was able to leave the USSA before I had even heard the name of Obumbo.
It is so sad to see the once great country turn into a third world hellhole.


4 posted on 05/13/2013 3:40:43 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
...Democrats hold a 39-28 majority, have said they believe they have the support to approve a bill legalizing gay marriage.

If they feel they have so much support, put it on a ballot and let the people vote for or against it. Every time it's put to the voters, it's been defeated. The only states that have it are ones where the legislature, all Demorat controlled, have passed it and the Demorat Gubner signed it.

5 posted on 05/13/2013 4:30:07 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Second world technically, if things are turning communist.


6 posted on 05/13/2013 4:38:05 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Besides the gay marriage fiasco the Minnesota Democrats are busy taxing everything imaginable. If you live in Minnesota you better have a deep wallet.


7 posted on 05/13/2013 5:18:04 AM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Second world technically, if things are turning communist.”
_______________________________________________

What is “second world”?
I have always heard of third world, and I, indeed, live in one of them, and 3 hours away from any big city.
Technology wise, I see no difference here then I saw in central Europe or the US.
Even the poorest of kids have a mobile phone, often more then one.
I have Satellite TV so I can watch FOX news and movies.
The world is now very small, and most everyone has what the other has.


8 posted on 05/13/2013 5:23:34 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Leaders in the Senate, where Democrats hold a 39-28 majority, have said they believe they have the support to approve a bill legalizing gay marriage.

The Democrat leaders in the Senate may have "support" by fools who believe that they can continue a transient popular culture, but it cannot continue. Same sex "marriage" is contrary to natural law and will NOT stand the test of time.

I hope that the lawmakers can be held liable for the added risk and costs to the health of safety of the people of that state.

9 posted on 05/13/2013 5:32:03 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

10 posted on 05/13/2013 6:09:36 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

The economy in Minnestoopid is going to implode. Not just taxes and regulation, but also political pressure to follow the DFL party line. Add to that the increasing requirement for “renewable energy sources” - 25% by 2025, some DFL’ers want to see it at 100%. The implosion going on in California will seem tame. Minnestoopind may wind up resembling Norkland.


11 posted on 05/13/2013 6:11:12 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’m betting that this rush to approve gay marriage will within 5 years result in the legalization of polygamy...likely by the dictate of some liberal judge.


12 posted on 05/13/2013 6:21:40 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

“If they feel they have so much support, put it on a ballot and let the people vote for or against it. Every time it’s put to the voters, it’s been defeated. The only states that have it are ones where the legislature, all Demorat controlled, have passed it and the Demorat Gubner signed it.”

Minnesota’s pro-marriage amendment failed to pass by popular vote last year, getting 47%. The three states that have recognized ‘gay marriage’ by popular voting process last year are Maine, Maryland, and Washington.

To the state, marriage is whatever judges, pols, or 51% of the voting public thinks it is at any one time. That’s it, that’s all it can ever be to the state, at least in the modern era.

Freegards


13 posted on 05/13/2013 6:26:04 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

It’s hard to have much sympathy for silly states like DE and MN that commit hari-kari. But I guess there are small pockets of conservatives there who are overwhelmed by the liberals in their midst.


14 posted on 05/13/2013 6:39:40 AM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
If they feel they have so much support, put it on a ballot and let the people vote for or against it. Every time it's put to the voters, it's been defeated. The only states that have it are ones where the legislature, all Demorat controlled, have passed it and the Demorat Gubner signed it.

I'm sorry, but that's just not true.

It was once upon a time, but last November took that argument away from us. Gay marriage was on the ballot in four states, including Minnesota, and won every single state. A clean sweep for them.

That's why the Minnesota legislators are now "brave" enough to step forward and put their names to it; Minnesota has already gone to the ballot box and said gay marriage is just fine and dandy.

It's important to acknowledge the steep hill we're now facing if we have any hope of making the climb.
15 posted on 05/13/2013 6:56:32 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed; highball
In a fair election, the marriage referendum would have passed, but elections have been thoroughly corrupted since 2008 (2010 had enough anger and conservative momentum to overcome the fraud, which the Left has doubled down on since.)

It is my certain belief that the marriage elections in the 4 states were all stolen. The Gaystapo was thoroughly demoralized by the showing in North Carolina's marriage amendment victory that there was no way they would let this happen again, "by any means necessary." They couldn't stomach the thought that in this day and age that they believe has gone completely homo-ingratiating that some state could dare vote against them. It doesn't match the narrative, and so the results had to be changed in typical Leftist fashion.

I think history will discover the corruption in these races.

16 posted on 05/13/2013 7:24:53 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“The Gaystapo was thoroughly demoralized by the showing in North Carolina’s marriage amendment victory that there was no way they would let this happen again, “by any means necessary.” They couldn’t stomach the thought that in this day and age that they believe has gone completely homo-ingratiating that some state could dare vote against them.”

NC passed it’s amendment by 61% in 2012 and was hailed a great victory by many. But consider—every state around NC passed their amendments at least 4+ years before 2012. Except VA in 2008 (57%), there wasn’t one state in that region that voted an amendment in by less than 75%, some were higher. That trend doesn’t look good to me, cheating or not.

Think about this, CA’s prop 22 passed by 61% in 2000 (prop. 8 was 52% in 2008). So NC basically tied the state of CA of 12 years ago on the issue of ‘gay marriage.’ If you would have told someone in 2000 that in 12 years NC would be where present day CA is on ‘gay marriage’ they would have thought you were crazy.

Freegards


17 posted on 05/13/2013 7:45:26 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: highball; Ransomed

I stand corrected!


18 posted on 05/13/2013 7:52:52 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Bushbacker1

Wrong. It was approved by voters three times last November, with a fourth state (Minnesota) voting to reject an amendment defining marriage between a man and a woman.


20 posted on 05/13/2013 9:21:13 AM PDT by Clemenza ("History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil governm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson