Posted on 02/14/2013 6:21:43 AM PST by KeyLargo
Edited on 02/14/2013 9:25:10 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Police in Christopher Dorner standoff launched incendiary tear gas into cabin
By CHUCK BENNETT and DAVID K. LI From Post Wires Last Updated: 6:14 AM, February 14, 2013
Murderous ex-cop Christopher Jordan Dorner wanted to go out in a blaze of glory and the sheriffs deputies who surrounded his California mountain hideout provided the flames.
The San Bernardino County cops torched the wooden cabin with highly flammable incendiary tear gas as Dorner took refuge Tuesday, apparently burning him to a crisp.
Burn this mf--er! one officer shouted as they had Dorner who had earlier killed a deputy and seriously wounded another pinned down in the cabin, according to police radio transmissions.
Amid sounds of gunfire, voices can be head shouting, Burn it down! and Shoot the gas!
Excerpt, read more at nypost
Yes there have been posters on here expressing sympathy and support for Dorner.
“Amid sounds of gunfire, voices can be head shouting, Burn it down! and Shoot the gas!
OK, and your point is?
To bad we haven’t learned that lesson in Iraq and Afstan.
What were they sopposed to do? Use harsh words?!
Don’t bother warning them. They won’t listen. Let them go on thinking cops are their friends and would never, ever do this to them or give them the treatment those people driving the wrong kind of car got. Let them find out the hard way.
Incendiary arrows and pots containing combustible substances were used as early as the 9th century BC.
Tell me about it!
Somewhere there is a nail looking to start a lawsuit for blunt trauma to his head.
The people supporting Dorner would not have been able to coax him out peacefully, nor would they have tried.
Ok, but not me. I’m just trying to AAR the response a little bit. But I do hope that this drives a wedge between those in Law Enforcement and those on the left. May they never forget who Dorner was and who said what in the aftermath. Who was on their side and who wasn’t.
When it was Dorner vs LAPD it was badguy on badguy violence.
I grabbed the popcorn and laughed.
If Dorner had stayed in LAPD jurisdiction he might still be alive giving them fits.
I think that’s the point.
We’ve seen way too many times the intentional killing of a suspect through burning, and if it wasn’t an issue, there would be no attempt to deny it.
Those of you that interpret this as “support for Dorner” are the equivalent of a leftist yelling “racist” in order not to address the issue at hand.
So if law enforcement went door-to-door to confiscate weapons, you’d just give them up?
I don’t understand the urgency. They’ve been hunting this guy for days and now he’s essentially cornered.
If they didn’t know for certain that he didn’t have an aresnal and a bunch of food, then they didn’t know for certain if he had hostages. There doesn’t seem to have been much, if any, communication, at least from the reports I’ve read.
Yet they couldn’t wait him out? Not even for one day? Even if just to save the structure and not risk a fire in a state forest?
If Obama had a son he’d look like Dorner....get ready for blowback from the grievance community.
I know.
You got freepmail for reading leisure.
Let me know what you think.
I was here late last night and the liberaltatians were out in force calling this an execution and the cops murders..
My felling is Burn baby burn...
Badge = Police + Prosecutor + Judge + Jury + Executioner.
No messy Due Process.
Pretty cool!
I don't think the intentional burn outs are frequent, but I will say that denying the burn out was intention has a detrimental effect on the credibility of the law enforcement community.
Oh well. Them vs. Us. That's the way they think and behave, and nothing I can do will change it.
See post #16
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.