Missouri House Proposes Jail Time for Feds Violating the 2nd Amendment (Don't tread on Missouri)

Gateway Pundit ^ | 1/16/13 | Jim Hoft

[donozark]

Yup. Holding my breath to see how Mother McCaskill comes down on this. LOL

Can't wait to hear her comments. Then again, yes I can!

[gfbtbb]

Texas, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon and now Missouri.
Anybody else seeing a trend?

[Marcella]

A bill filed in Texas puts any fed who comes in our state to take weapons, in prison for 5 years. Attorney General Abbott says he will have them arrested right then if they come into Texas with that intention.

I think Hussein/Holder should forget about Texas.

[DoodleDawg]

It shall be unlawful for any officer or employee of this state, or any political subdivision, or any federal firearms dealer licensed under 19 U.S.C. Section 923 to enforce or attempt to enforce any act, law, statute, rule, or regulation of the federal government relating to a personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in the state of Missouri and that remains exclusively within the boundaries of the state of Missouri.

Wouldn't that include any laws federal against owning fully automatic weapons and sawed off shotguns?

[greeneyes]

For Once? Surely in all our history, we have been a leader more than once?

Glad to see Missouri standing up to be counted.

[Evil Slayer]

Rep Todd Akin on May 26th 2012 concerning the 17th Amendment......

Calling himself a “strong conservative,” Akin said he has “a very serious concern about erosion of states’ rights and reversing this decision might pull that balance back.”

Akin’s two main rivals in the GOP race — John Brunner and Sarah Steelman — said that while they agreed too much power has migrated to the federal government, they were in favor of keeping the 17th Amendment in place.

Supporters say the amendment reduces corruption by reducing the influence of state legislators and gives more power to the public. Opponents say allowing legislatures to pick senators would make them more accountable to their states and reduce the number of unfunded mandates handed down by Congress.

[pilipo]

Should get thru both chambers but will then have to override the Gov’s. veto.

[Just another Joe]

Missouri ping

Low volume ping list

FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.

[Just another Joe]

Missouri ping

Low volume ping list

FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.

[patriotUSA]

Currently the Feds can take weapons away from illegal aliens and prosecute them for unlawful possession. Will they still be able to do that is this bill passes in MO?

[stbdside]

Add Oklahoma to the list.

[CatDancer]

I’m a retiree, too. Come to Springfield; I like it here. We’re mostly conservative, but we’ll need more in numbers. MO. has a Dem governor, tho. But for pete’s sake, anywhere should be better than NJ.! (I don’t mean to insult your state, in case you like it, but.........)

[CatDancer]

Are you kidding? Where do the Feds prosecute them for anything??

We have County Sheriffs who can do that better, and who won’t take weapons away from anybody else.

[kindred]

The national socialist progressives are being repudiated by free Americans and all non communist states need to stand against the dictator obamanation and his evil policies that destroy our children's future.

[Quickgun]

With places like Texas and Oklahoma, Wyoming following suit, this looks good.Hmmm Here in Texas we are allowed to stop illegal burglars with the use of deadly force as well, so when the state passes law that makes it a felony for a fed to search your home for firearms...Just say’in..

[ridesthemiles]

Because in the 30’s, the winds connected to the Dust Bowl were damaging farms in Missouri.

Today, no one is willing moving to California except the illegals from south of the border.

[painter]

Now, lets see if: a) it passes and b) if they can override the inevitable veto!

The republicans have the votes to override anything Nixon vetoes. Whether it happens or not is another story.