Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama won’t go after marijuana use in 2 states
Associated Press ^ | Dec. 14, 2012 1:52 PM EST | Pete Yost

Posted on 12/15/2012 3:48:33 PM PST by Olog-hai

President Barack Obama says the federal government won’t go after recreational marijuana use in Washington state and Colorado, where voters have legalized it.

In a Barbara Walters interview airing Friday on ABC, Obama was asked whether he supports making pot legal.

“I wouldn’t go that far,” Obama replied. “But what I think is that, at this point, Washington and Colorado, you’ve seen the voters speak on this issue.”

But the president said he won’t pursue the issue in the two states where voters legalized the use of marijuana in the November elections. Marijuana remains illegal under federal law. …

(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: District of Columbia; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: bho44; cannabis; choomgang; drugs; drugwar; legalpot; legalthc; marijuana; potheads; statesrights; warondrugs; wod; wodlist; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: Drew68
Actually, he is. There's nothing Constitutional about our drug laws.

Until the SCOTUS says otherwise,they're presumed to be Constitutional.

61 posted on 12/16/2012 4:46:58 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (When Robbing Peter To Pay Paul,One Can Always Count On Paul's Cooperation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Until the SCOTUS says otherwise,they're presumed to be Constitutional.

If they are presumed to be Constitutional, SCOTUS will never say otherwise. SCOTUS saying otherwise has to start with someone challenging whether the law is constitutional. To do that you first have to throw out the presumption that it is constitutional.

62 posted on 12/16/2012 5:00:09 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
There's nothing Constitutional about our drug laws.

Until the SCOTUS says otherwise,they're presumed to be Constitutional.

"Presumed" for purposes of legal proceedings, perhaps - but no true conservative would let the court that has repeatedly upheld Roe v Wade decide for him what's Constitutional.

63 posted on 12/17/2012 9:09:38 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Maybe it just should be put to a vote in each state.


64 posted on 12/19/2012 10:24:23 AM PST by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to, otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson