Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
Actually, he is. There's nothing Constitutional about our drug laws.

Until the SCOTUS says otherwise,they're presumed to be Constitutional.

61 posted on 12/16/2012 4:46:58 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (When Robbing Peter To Pay Paul,One Can Always Count On Paul's Cooperation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative
Until the SCOTUS says otherwise,they're presumed to be Constitutional.

If they are presumed to be Constitutional, SCOTUS will never say otherwise. SCOTUS saying otherwise has to start with someone challenging whether the law is constitutional. To do that you first have to throw out the presumption that it is constitutional.

62 posted on 12/16/2012 5:00:09 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
There's nothing Constitutional about our drug laws.

Until the SCOTUS says otherwise,they're presumed to be Constitutional.

"Presumed" for purposes of legal proceedings, perhaps - but no true conservative would let the court that has repeatedly upheld Roe v Wade decide for him what's Constitutional.

63 posted on 12/17/2012 9:09:38 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson