Skip to comments.
Susan Rice will not be nominated for Secretary of State
American Thinker ^
| 11/17/2012
| Scott Varland
Posted on 11/18/2012 7:02:38 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: SeekAndFind
We’ll see but I think this is incorrect. The idiot in chief will nominate her.
2
posted on
11/18/2012 7:05:21 AM PST
by
youngidiot
(God help us.)
To: SeekAndFind
The position of SOS has become nothing by PC symbolism. Since Madeline Albright, there has been no substance in the job.
3
posted on
11/18/2012 7:09:48 AM PST
by
Cowboy Bob
(Greed + Envy = Liberalism)
To: SeekAndFind
she won’t be nominated...Obama wants a black mail in that position....oops...looks like I made a pun...
To: youngidiot
I agree - Obummer thinks he can do whatever he wants. The other fallacy in this article is “she would be grilled under oath about....” since when has being under oath ever meant anything to this crowd. They couldn’t tell the truth if JC himself were standing in front of them.
5
posted on
11/18/2012 7:10:41 AM PST
by
Elkiejg
(Democrats/Liberals/progressives are EVIL!!)
To: youngidiot
Obama acted tough during that news contest, but he won’t nominate her. Obama made the conscience decision to discard her and her career the day he asked her to spread the lies about the YouTube video. All his bravado was to have a bunch of female Obamaite Congresswomen carry the torch from then on. He won’t mention it again. He has no problem using those around or beneath him to further his agenda. Goodbye Ms.Rice!
To: youngidiot
She has been floated as a possible Secretary of State to give the President the opportunity to tar her critics as racists and sexists and to conceal the fact that she will not be nominated. I think the author is right. She'd have to testify under oath in her confirmation hearings about who sent her out with the ridiculous video story, and Obama doesn't want to risk that.
7
posted on
11/18/2012 7:27:49 AM PST
by
livius
To: 2010Freeper
Hate to disagree however since being elevated to the Thou shall not criticize a black _______, she will be nominated. Think the bonehead Repubs risk catching crap while they are out shopping for a bigger tent? With respect.
8
posted on
11/18/2012 7:29:12 AM PST
by
JohnD9207
(Isn't freedom worth fighting for?)
To: 2010Freeper
Not Goodbye...good riddance.
9
posted on
11/18/2012 7:31:47 AM PST
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: livius
She was fibbing then.
She’ll fib again.
10
posted on
11/18/2012 7:32:15 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
To: SeekAndFind
She is a black women who was used by a half black president. It will be interesting to see what she does.
11
posted on
11/18/2012 7:35:17 AM PST
by
UB355
(Slower traffic keep right)
To: SeekAndFind
How this ends up will be a sign of whether they’ve drugged him enough to at times offset his malignant narcissism. If not, he’ll nominate her just as a stick in everyone’s eye.
12
posted on
11/18/2012 7:35:23 AM PST
by
John W
(Viva Cristo Rey!)
To: SeekAndFind
He'll just leave her as ambassador....no problem.
I would imagine by now that some of his white, male thugs are getting po'd that women are getting jobs that OBVIOUSLY belong to them.
To: Eric in the Ozarks
There might be more legal implications under oath in a confirmation hearing. She’s obviously not going to take the blame herself and the regime has run out of other people willing to accept the blame (although they may have a long shot if Hillary never comes back to the US...).
And I can’t believe she’d get away with saying that she just didn’t know why she said it! Something just came over her. Poor little her. That might be a bit much even for our ever-credulous senators.
14
posted on
11/18/2012 7:38:19 AM PST
by
livius
To: Sacajaweau
15
posted on
11/18/2012 7:38:52 AM PST
by
guardian_of_liberty
(We must bind the Government with the Chains of the Constitution...)
16
posted on
11/18/2012 7:42:56 AM PST
by
RedMDer
(May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
To: youngidiot
Not sure on this one. Obama used her up, but it would seem consistent for him to think he could kill the sacrificial lamb and have it to.
To: SeekAndFind
Susan Rice really should have resigned when it was revealed that she was used by the administration (with or without her knowledge) to put out a high profile false story. Either way though, it's pretty clear they don't think she needs to tender her resignation since anyone who dares to question her will be tagged as a racist misogynist.
18
posted on
11/18/2012 7:48:59 AM PST
by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: livius
If Barky does nominate her, look for some real fireworks.
19
posted on
11/18/2012 7:50:59 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
To: SeekAndFind
Anyone who criticizes Susan Rice is a bigot and a sexist. /s
20
posted on
11/18/2012 7:52:59 AM PST
by
OKSooner
("I will bless those who bless thee, and I will curse those who curse thee.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson