Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

We’ll see but I think this is incorrect. The idiot in chief will nominate her.


2 posted on 11/18/2012 7:05:21 AM PST by youngidiot (God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: youngidiot

I agree - Obummer thinks he can do whatever he wants. The other fallacy in this article is “she would be grilled under oath about....” since when has being under oath ever meant anything to this crowd. They couldn’t tell the truth if JC himself were standing in front of them.


5 posted on 11/18/2012 7:10:41 AM PST by Elkiejg (Democrats/Liberals/progressives are EVIL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot

Obama acted tough during that news contest, but he won’t nominate her. Obama made the conscience decision to discard her and her career the day he asked her to spread the lies about the YouTube video. All his bravado was to have a bunch of female Obamaite Congresswomen carry the torch from then on. He won’t mention it again. He has no problem using those around or beneath him to further his agenda. Goodbye Ms.Rice!


6 posted on 11/18/2012 7:13:24 AM PST by 2010Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot
She has been floated as a possible Secretary of State to give the President the opportunity to tar her critics as racists and sexists and to conceal the fact that she will not be nominated.

I think the author is right. She'd have to testify under oath in her confirmation hearings about who sent her out with the ridiculous video story, and Obama doesn't want to risk that.

7 posted on 11/18/2012 7:27:49 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot

Not sure on this one. Obama used her up, but it would seem consistent for him to think he could kill the sacrificial lamb and have it to.


17 posted on 11/18/2012 7:46:15 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot

re: “We’ll see but I think this is incorrect. The idiot in chief will nominate her.”

I agree with you. If Obama doesn’t nominate her, then that will look like there is something to this “Benghazi thing”.

Also, do we really think any questions regarding Benghazi will be allowed? Or, the real question, are there any Republican senators who have the guts to even ask her about it? I doubt it.


21 posted on 11/18/2012 8:02:08 AM PST by rusty schucklefurd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot

Just like Obama won’t be re-elected in 2012


24 posted on 11/18/2012 8:13:44 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot
The idiot in chief will nominate her.

I think that is correct. And further, I don't think she'll be grilled on Benghazi. At all. Who on the Right side has any balls to do that? The other side will have their ducks in a row for any confirmation hearings...just as they did for the most recent election.

27 posted on 11/18/2012 8:52:15 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts ('Need' now means wanting someone else's money. 'Greed' means wanting to keep your own...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot

Seem to me, the”idiot in chIef” likes nothing better than poking a sick at normal white Christians and nominating this black racist would do exactly that.


29 posted on 11/18/2012 9:00:17 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: youngidiot

I think your right his arrogance won’t let him back down. Someone needs to keep bitch Hillary in the limelight too this was her failure too more than anyone else.


43 posted on 11/18/2012 10:13:58 AM PST by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson