If I were Zero, I wouldn't be worried. You need 67 senators to remove.
Posted on 11/15/2012 4:29:22 PM PST by hole_n_one
Just a few minutes ago on CNN, Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr reported that a high-placed source informed her that former CIA Chief David Petraeus will use his upcoming testimony to amend his previous testimony. According to this source, Petraeus will tell the closed door congressional hearing that he knew "almost immediately" that the September 11 anniversary attack on our Libyan consulate was a terrorist attack committed by the al-Qaeda-linked militia Ansar Al Sharia.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
NEVER believe what they say. ALWAYS watch what they do.
They should never have leaked this before the hearing.
If he is intent on doing this...and I hope he goes further and blows the cover off of the entire Obama Benghazi-gate scheme...then the man has to take signficant precautions for his life and that of his family.
Walking Al Quida in Benghazi
http://www.jeffhead.com/walkingalquida.htm
I don't see it that way. It's still GP's America that he served from the beginning of his career, it doesn't belong to BHO plus what better way to protect America by being inside.
Thanks for that! 1,000 words!
Yes, and he has been from the gitgo. This us why he tried to blame that idiotic video on an Israeli Jewish billionaire when all along it was a muslim fbi asset. It was all planned to have Israel take the fall for the muslim rage all over the ME and cover the attack in Libya. Blame Israel and when THEY are attacked, say they brought it on themselves. THIS is why he gave the exact speech he gave at the UN.
Wonder if Greta checked the WH visitor log for Sept 24th?
Consider this:
How could the White House/Hildabeast have conjoured the "movie" cannard so quickly....within hours. Since we know now that the movie distraction was just that, and since Obama knew it was a terrorist attack immediately why was there a need for lying? Answer: He did not want the preelection information out. When it went south on him by the early a.m. hours of 9-12 why did they 'settle' on this (of the hundreds of antimuslim videos on Youtube) particular video? The only thing which could answer it is Obama was engaged in doing something (via Stevens) which he did not want the public to know. So they had a backup story ready if events which obama thought he could control, spun out of control....it did. Either the 'Stevens feigned kidnapping for the Blind Sheik' or " 'gunrunning' would explain all of these questions. It is not as simple as Obama wanting the country (US) to warm up to muslims or Ben Ladens al Quaeda was on the run. That would not put the Obama inner sactum into such a lying tailspin. Neither would it cause Obama to sacrifice Rice.....a terrorist attack, so proclaimed would not have cost him a vote. So why the lie about a 14 minute videa? Why would they need a backup plan ready to roll out so completely explaining the incitement to kill? It would have been enough to say we had an attack. But they did not say that. They sold (oversold) the video. Remember Hillary at Dover receiving the bodies. After a collated reading of the dead she spoke more about that 'awful, ugly video, which cause this attack. I told my wife at the time....'she protesteth too much'. If Obama was not doing something he ought not have been doing why the lying distraction of the video.
Now how do we go about proving it with a noncompliant adminsitration. I hope Petraeus comes through..but that will not be enough. We need to speak to those 30 people who the SEALS saved. But if it goes our way tomorrow with Petraeus, he will be labeled an admitted liar, adulterer, who cannot be counted on to even order the saving of the 4 men begging for help from the rooftop in Benghazi. You have to squeeze the correct testicle. Who is the testicle. Well Petraeus is one. Does he have any paperwork which elucidates what happened? Hillary will hold the line unless she is cornered and cannot figure a way out. Panetta is a democrat loyalist...does not give a hoot about the country. We have to speak to the 30 people who the SEALS saved. If Petraeus does not break through I don't see any way to crack the stone wall.
plugs' skirts arent too clean in this either. he was at the 5 PM meeting in the oval office with panetta and obozo.
He must be racist.
~~I am praying that you are right~
Impeachment proceedings need to begin immediately. Barack shouldn’t even make it to his next term at this rate...tossed out.
great
media won;t touch it
great
media won;t touch it
If I were Zero, I wouldn't be worried. You need 67 senators to remove.
Evil, Godless, Satanic, Hate-filled... Obama’s eyes say it all and the people next to him are his slavishly willing accomplices and enablers. Tagline: Only God Himself can deliver us from this evil.
~~Amen~~
WTF???
So now CNN is doing actual reporting?
I don’t believe it. Has to be a setup...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.