Apologies...I don’t remember the moderator’s handle to tell him that the html needs fixing. Can someone beep him, por favor.
I have oceanfront property for sale in Arizona too.
The CIA is not a military force. It’s an intelligence service.
Expecting them to “respond” and not only defend and rescue some 30 people and protect or retake a facility is utterly ridiculous.
Obama’s policy of sheltering the Islamists has knowingly left Americans and American interests undefended in all parts of the world, including the US (remember Fort Hood?).
There should have been an immediate military response to the attack on the consulate and the CIA “annex.” The CIA is not designed for this, military actions undertaken by its own members are not its purpose, and blaming the CIA for having been inadequate to deal with the attack is a cynical shifting of blame. But “Cynical” should be Barry’s middle name by now.
LOL, and the REASON this took 7 weeks to come out is.......?
How F’n STUPID does this admin think we are (a rhetorical question)?
Martha Raddatz! I don’t care what you say. I want to see someone dragged into the public square, before a firing squad. I want to hear them beg for help, Martha. I want you to cover it for ABC.
Too convenient to be withheld for so long. I don’t buy the story and of all people to reveal this information...Martha Radditz....curious, not.
Well it all makes sense now. Two coordinated attacks, unfriendly militias blocking the roads, automatic weapons, deadly mortar fire.
Sounds like a spontaneous protest over a video.
Obfuscate and confuse. It’s all they have left. Firing blanks with much sound and fury signifying nothing.
Martha Raddatz and ABC have no credibility left. I wouldn’t believe anything they report.
The Republic is dead... we are officially a full fledged democracy, where the ruling political class fabricate facts as needed. Call me when you’re really ready for a REAL REVOLUTION...
You had an ambassador and communication professional (Smith) who were guarded by the ‘February 17th Martyrs Brigade’.
Were they trafficking heavy arms to Syria? Probably. We’re they doing something hinky? Definitely.
Was what they were doing likely the province of the CIA? Most definitely.
Had people, including Stevens, raised alarm bells about the lack of security? Yup!
Was the CIA looking in on outright incompetence, while literally within earshot of rifle fire? Yes!
This all display Obama’s ideology, long held paranoia and bias world view. I’m sure Obama and his people thought what Steven’s was doing was sexy, because it was risky. Of coarse, a leftist can’t trust rank and file CIA, right? The CIA killed Che, Obama’s hero, Obama is the self styled Che of the new Islamic caliphate.
Again, you can’t trust the CIA, that is until your getting your ass shot off in a third world hell hole and your leftist party friends leave you for dead.
Stevens and Smith were expendable to Obama, but they weren’t expendable to Woods and Doherty.
Four dead that shouldn’t be: res ipsa loquitur.
Radditz did the ABC news story fawning over Obama and the rescue operation of two civilians in Somalia.
An ex Seal said that the mission that was done in Somalia was far more dangerous than taking out Bin Laden.
So, why not extract those in Benghazi??
Saw something from a Seal that says they are trained to jump from a commercial craft. So when those are allowed in airspace then they can go in for a Special Ops.
If you ask me, the rescue was lead by an Ex-Navy Seal who happen to be working for the CIA. Without him I am sure there would not have been any rescue.