Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let’s Have a Post-Election Peace Accord (Nation of Tribes)
ABC NEWS ^ | Oct 28, 2012 | Matthew Dowd

Posted on 10/28/2012 9:09:31 AM PDT by AmonAmarth

For more than 230 years we have called ourselves the United States of America, but we are fast becoming the Divided States of America.

In this incredibly tight election, there are a few things we know. Whatever the results are, they will show an incredibly polarized electorate. Nearly 95 percent of the partisan bases of each party will vote for their candidate. And because the election will be extremely close, the victor likely will have little mandate to govern and little cooperation from the opposite party in Congress.

In addition to the partisan divide that exists in this country, there also has developed an unfortunate divide at other levels. The election results will further highlight this problem.

The race divide is well documented and has increased. Blacks and Latinos will give near-universal support to President Obama, while a majority of white voters will go for Mitt Romney. Younger voters overwhelmingly support Obama; older voters back Romney. There will be a consistent divide between the sexes, with a majority of women supporting Obama and a majority of men siding with Romney. The income divide continues to grow, as lower-income voters support the president and wealthier ones endorse Romney.

There also is a spiritual divide in this country. Folks who have a strict interpretation of religion and faith will go for Romney, and voters who don’t attend church regularly or have a more progressive view of spirituality will choose Obama. Further, there is a marriage divide, especially among women, in which single women will vote for the president and many married women will vote for Romney. And then there’s the geographic and community divide. The large urban centers will vote overwhelmingly for Obama, and small towns and rural communities will be just as enthusiastic for Romney.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Me thinks a revolution is inevitable.
1 posted on 10/28/2012 9:09:38 AM PDT by AmonAmarth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth
"The large urban centers (packed with illegal aliens
and terrorists, armed from Fast&Furious)

will vote overwhelmingly for Obama, and small towns and
rural communities will be just as enthusiastic for Romney."

2 posted on 10/28/2012 9:13:11 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

Once we rid ourselves of the Libtards things will be real peaceful. They can all move to Canada.


3 posted on 10/28/2012 9:13:25 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

Nope,sorry...no sale.I don’t compromise with Maoists.Not ever!


4 posted on 10/28/2012 9:13:29 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

The MSM is already setting us up for “Mitt Romney won, but it wasn’t a mandate”.


5 posted on 10/28/2012 9:14:20 AM PDT by 109ACS (If this be Treason, then make the most of it. Patrick Henry, May 1765)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

The left celebrates diversity, yet when the nation becomes diversified to the point of breaking, suddenly they go into Rodney King mode and wonder ‘why we can’t all get along’.


6 posted on 10/28/2012 9:14:52 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Now that, would be cool. Dream a little Dream.


7 posted on 10/28/2012 9:15:16 AM PDT by AmonAmarth (Wherever you go...There you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

Considering who authored this; what ever he wants politically; I am against


8 posted on 10/28/2012 9:16:41 AM PDT by joelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge

A succinct statement if I ever seen one. You will see more of this, cant we just get along crap, more and more as we near the election. wussies


9 posted on 10/28/2012 9:18:32 AM PDT by AmonAmarth (Wherever you go...There you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DOWDIE_DOODIE

"We are becoming more a nation of tribes in which we align ourselves with a certain side and are unwilling to unite for the benefit of the country as a whole.  As many sociologists and historians have pointed out, democracy can’t survive or function in tribal cultures. We are on a fast road to a broken democracy with an inability to reach consensus on the big issues."

Good thing, then, that we are a republic and we can unite around the constitution.


10 posted on 10/28/2012 9:21:17 AM PDT by I see my hands (On the other hand.. dictators don't lose elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

Sure, let’s start with the oft-repeated word: “fairness.”

1. Everyone pays income taxes. Everyone.
2. Everyone pays the same rate of taxes. Everyone.
3. Enforce laws against illegal aliens. Deport all the ones we find. Shutter businesses that use them. This will lead to self-deportation. NO services — go back to SCOTUS if need be.
4. Welfare requires expense audits. Every dime needs to be accounted for. No more $300 weaves, plasma TVs and Satellite.
5. Admit that freedom of religion does not mean freedom from religion.

That is the STARTING SPOT for “Peace” with liberals.


11 posted on 10/28/2012 9:21:29 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (We canÂ’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents. -- moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

I agree! We need to have peace accord. Just as soon as we drive all of the socialist SOBs out of this nation, we can have peace.


12 posted on 10/28/2012 9:21:48 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth
Sorry but the only way I will consider peace is if the liberals give up trying to destroy this country and they give me some heads on pikes. Obama, Jerett, Clinton and Panetta will do to start.

They left our guys to die.

For that I want blood.

13 posted on 10/28/2012 9:22:27 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Fate plays chess and you don't find out until too late that he's been using two queens all along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth; All

Rest of the article:

There also is a spiritual divide in this country. Folks who have a strict interpretation of religion and faith will go for Romney, and voters who don’t attend church regularly or have a more progressive view of spirituality will choose Obama. Further, there is a marriage divide, especially among women, in which single women will vote for the president and many married women will vote for Romney. And then there’s the geographic and community divide. The large urban centers will vote overwhelmingly for Obama, and small towns and rural communities will be just as enthusiastic for Romney. Most of the voters on the East and West coasts will vote for Obama, while the middle of the country by and large will go for Romney.

We are becoming more a nation of tribes in which we align ourselves with a certain side and are unwilling to unite for the benefit of the country as a whole. As many sociologists and historians have pointed out, democracy can’t survive or function in tribal cultures. We are on a fast road to a broken democracy with an inability to reach consensus on the big issues.

There are many things to blame for this: A media culture that seems to reward and encourage bitter and rancorous communication, a political culture that puts party over country, an unwillingness for all sides to sacrifice for everyone’s benefit and a winner-take-all attitude at every level in which compromise and agreement are seen as signs of weakness as opposed to strength.

What can we do? How can we again become the United States of America, and bridge the great divides that seem to exist at all levels? It is the biggest problem that I believe is facing the country, because without solving it, we can’t really solve any other problems. To start on a path towards a solution it is up to all of us individually, as well as the two parties and presidential candidates.

For us as individuals, we need to begin to bridge these divides in our own neighborhoods and communities. In our behaviors and communication, we need to open ourselves up to more diversity and understanding of others’ points of view. We need to be able to discuss issues without yelling. We need to treat each other with respect and dignity, not see each other as an opponent or enemy. And we need to begin to make choices in news that encourage respect and calm as opposed to raising the heat. We need to practice the golden mean in how we act and what we say and what we watch.

The first order of business on Election Night will be for the victor to begin to heal the divisions and build bridges on each of the divides. But it can’t just be words. After Election Night, we need to have our own peace accord. In the past, we have brought fighting countries to Camp David to try and build a lasting peace. We need to have our own Camp David talks among ourselves to solve these incredible divides and polarization. These summits should include leaders from around the country in politics, faith, business and social entrepreneurs. This United States peace process should be out of the glare of cameras and media, so leaders cannot feel pressured to run back to their side and revert to partisan talking points.

It’s probably even more important for the candidate who finishes second on Election Night to put party aside and reach out. His role in solving this divide is huge, as it is in any peace reached anywhere. It will take a tremendous amount of courage and strength for the election loser to bring their supporters along in this peace process. It will be so easy just to attack the winning party, but the power to return us to a more united country in many ways is held more by the one who concedes.

As we face all these divides, the ability to unite ourselves is by far the most critical issue we face. It is a power and a responsibility that each of us has. Otherwise, no matter what the election results are, there will be no winner.


14 posted on 10/28/2012 9:24:35 AM PDT by AmonAmarth (Wherever you go...There you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth
Almost every country engages in coalition politics of some sort. Even dictatorships have their factions.

Your typical parliamentary democracy sorts out the alignments after the election. Some of them seem to have everything put together before the election, but a coalition 'Government' may be possible anyway simply because of the action of the election laws that require forming a 'Government'.

The United States, besides being larger than most other nations, also has an iron-clad formation as single-member districts ~ each state is, in fact, a district for a senator.

That pattern is followed within each state down to city councils, county boards, and so on.

One of the consequences of this structure and its standards is that the coalitions must form BEFORE the elections, and then, because it takes 50%+1 vote to win, in most places most coalition parties will end up fairly evenly matched at 50/50.

Redistricting will stir the pot of course, but not enough to upset a statewide balance.

Over time individual constituent parts of a coalition will become dissatisfied. Maybe, for instance, a small faction ~ we'll call it the DNG-e ~ will end up controlling the candidate selection process, but they keep coming up with losers, or candidates who once in office do nothing for the other possibly larger coalition partners.

That could persuade a coalition partner to abandon that party and go to another one!

Some times a try will be made at forming a new party ~ alas, in a nation this large subdivided into thousands of constituent governments, and with tens of thousands of possible coalition partners, it doesn't work. For the most part any new faction will end up embracing one or the other of the parties ~ and sometimes that can be swift and sudden!

FDR picked up several hard core Republican factions in 1932, and they never looked back. Southern whites dropped the Democrats like a hot potato in the 1980s ~ and now they are an integral part of the Republican party.

Leftwingtards abandoned the Republicans in droves ~ and so on.

Factions move.

As the current Democrat President demonstrates to his very own leftwingtard coalition that their ideas end up getting them killed we might see a new sweep of 'neo neo neo con cons' out of the ranks of Democrat coalition members back into the Republican coalition.

That's why revolutions rarely happen around here. Social mobility is tolerated.

15 posted on 10/28/2012 9:25:19 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth

And the ABC darkness reaches out to the light and says lets blend together...


16 posted on 10/28/2012 9:26:16 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Crispy critters would suffice.


17 posted on 10/28/2012 9:26:55 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmonAmarth
sure... as long as it starts with trials for TREASON and the HANGING of those convicted of it!!!
18 posted on 10/28/2012 9:27:25 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

lol. yep.


19 posted on 10/28/2012 9:29:32 AM PDT by AmonAmarth (Wherever you go...There you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Leftists and their friends

NO FORGIVENESS EVER.

20 posted on 10/28/2012 9:32:03 AM PDT by I see my hands (On the other hand.. dictators don't lose elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson