Posted on 10/28/2012 9:09:31 AM PDT by AmonAmarth
For more than 230 years we have called ourselves the United States of America, but we are fast becoming the Divided States of America.
In this incredibly tight election, there are a few things we know. Whatever the results are, they will show an incredibly polarized electorate. Nearly 95 percent of the partisan bases of each party will vote for their candidate. And because the election will be extremely close, the victor likely will have little mandate to govern and little cooperation from the opposite party in Congress.
In addition to the partisan divide that exists in this country, there also has developed an unfortunate divide at other levels. The election results will further highlight this problem.
The race divide is well documented and has increased. Blacks and Latinos will give near-universal support to President Obama, while a majority of white voters will go for Mitt Romney. Younger voters overwhelmingly support Obama; older voters back Romney. There will be a consistent divide between the sexes, with a majority of women supporting Obama and a majority of men siding with Romney. The income divide continues to grow, as lower-income voters support the president and wealthier ones endorse Romney.
There also is a spiritual divide in this country. Folks who have a strict interpretation of religion and faith will go for Romney, and voters who dont attend church regularly or have a more progressive view of spirituality will choose Obama. Further, there is a marriage divide, especially among women, in which single women will vote for the president and many married women will vote for Romney. And then theres the geographic and community divide. The large urban centers will vote overwhelmingly for Obama, and small towns and rural communities will be just as enthusiastic for Romney.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Once we rid ourselves of the Libtards things will be real peaceful. They can all move to Canada.
Nope,sorry...no sale.I don’t compromise with Maoists.Not ever!
The MSM is already setting us up for “Mitt Romney won, but it wasn’t a mandate”.
The left celebrates diversity, yet when the nation becomes diversified to the point of breaking, suddenly they go into Rodney King mode and wonder ‘why we can’t all get along’.
Now that, would be cool. Dream a little Dream.
Considering who authored this; what ever he wants politically; I am against
A succinct statement if I ever seen one. You will see more of this, cant we just get along crap, more and more as we near the election. wussies
Good thing, then, that we are a republic and we can unite around the constitution. |
Sure, let’s start with the oft-repeated word: “fairness.”
1. Everyone pays income taxes. Everyone.
2. Everyone pays the same rate of taxes. Everyone.
3. Enforce laws against illegal aliens. Deport all the ones we find. Shutter businesses that use them. This will lead to self-deportation. NO services — go back to SCOTUS if need be.
4. Welfare requires expense audits. Every dime needs to be accounted for. No more $300 weaves, plasma TVs and Satellite.
5. Admit that freedom of religion does not mean freedom from religion.
That is the STARTING SPOT for “Peace” with liberals.
I agree! We need to have peace accord. Just as soon as we drive all of the socialist SOBs out of this nation, we can have peace.
They left our guys to die.
For that I want blood.
Rest of the article:
There also is a spiritual divide in this country. Folks who have a strict interpretation of religion and faith will go for Romney, and voters who dont attend church regularly or have a more progressive view of spirituality will choose Obama. Further, there is a marriage divide, especially among women, in which single women will vote for the president and many married women will vote for Romney. And then theres the geographic and community divide. The large urban centers will vote overwhelmingly for Obama, and small towns and rural communities will be just as enthusiastic for Romney. Most of the voters on the East and West coasts will vote for Obama, while the middle of the country by and large will go for Romney.
We are becoming more a nation of tribes in which we align ourselves with a certain side and are unwilling to unite for the benefit of the country as a whole. As many sociologists and historians have pointed out, democracy cant survive or function in tribal cultures. We are on a fast road to a broken democracy with an inability to reach consensus on the big issues.
There are many things to blame for this: A media culture that seems to reward and encourage bitter and rancorous communication, a political culture that puts party over country, an unwillingness for all sides to sacrifice for everyones benefit and a winner-take-all attitude at every level in which compromise and agreement are seen as signs of weakness as opposed to strength.
What can we do? How can we again become the United States of America, and bridge the great divides that seem to exist at all levels? It is the biggest problem that I believe is facing the country, because without solving it, we cant really solve any other problems. To start on a path towards a solution it is up to all of us individually, as well as the two parties and presidential candidates.
For us as individuals, we need to begin to bridge these divides in our own neighborhoods and communities. In our behaviors and communication, we need to open ourselves up to more diversity and understanding of others points of view. We need to be able to discuss issues without yelling. We need to treat each other with respect and dignity, not see each other as an opponent or enemy. And we need to begin to make choices in news that encourage respect and calm as opposed to raising the heat. We need to practice the golden mean in how we act and what we say and what we watch.
The first order of business on Election Night will be for the victor to begin to heal the divisions and build bridges on each of the divides. But it cant just be words. After Election Night, we need to have our own peace accord. In the past, we have brought fighting countries to Camp David to try and build a lasting peace. We need to have our own Camp David talks among ourselves to solve these incredible divides and polarization. These summits should include leaders from around the country in politics, faith, business and social entrepreneurs. This United States peace process should be out of the glare of cameras and media, so leaders cannot feel pressured to run back to their side and revert to partisan talking points.
Its probably even more important for the candidate who finishes second on Election Night to put party aside and reach out. His role in solving this divide is huge, as it is in any peace reached anywhere. It will take a tremendous amount of courage and strength for the election loser to bring their supporters along in this peace process. It will be so easy just to attack the winning party, but the power to return us to a more united country in many ways is held more by the one who concedes.
As we face all these divides, the ability to unite ourselves is by far the most critical issue we face. It is a power and a responsibility that each of us has. Otherwise, no matter what the election results are, there will be no winner.
Your typical parliamentary democracy sorts out the alignments after the election. Some of them seem to have everything put together before the election, but a coalition 'Government' may be possible anyway simply because of the action of the election laws that require forming a 'Government'.
The United States, besides being larger than most other nations, also has an iron-clad formation as single-member districts ~ each state is, in fact, a district for a senator.
That pattern is followed within each state down to city councils, county boards, and so on.
One of the consequences of this structure and its standards is that the coalitions must form BEFORE the elections, and then, because it takes 50%+1 vote to win, in most places most coalition parties will end up fairly evenly matched at 50/50.
Redistricting will stir the pot of course, but not enough to upset a statewide balance.
Over time individual constituent parts of a coalition will become dissatisfied. Maybe, for instance, a small faction ~ we'll call it the DNG-e ~ will end up controlling the candidate selection process, but they keep coming up with losers, or candidates who once in office do nothing for the other possibly larger coalition partners.
That could persuade a coalition partner to abandon that party and go to another one!
Some times a try will be made at forming a new party ~ alas, in a nation this large subdivided into thousands of constituent governments, and with tens of thousands of possible coalition partners, it doesn't work. For the most part any new faction will end up embracing one or the other of the parties ~ and sometimes that can be swift and sudden!
FDR picked up several hard core Republican factions in 1932, and they never looked back. Southern whites dropped the Democrats like a hot potato in the 1980s ~ and now they are an integral part of the Republican party.
Leftwingtards abandoned the Republicans in droves ~ and so on.
Factions move.
As the current Democrat President demonstrates to his very own leftwingtard coalition that their ideas end up getting them killed we might see a new sweep of 'neo neo neo con cons' out of the ranks of Democrat coalition members back into the Republican coalition.
That's why revolutions rarely happen around here. Social mobility is tolerated.
And the ABC darkness reaches out to the light and says lets blend together...
Crispy critters would suffice.
lol. yep.
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.