Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Whatever you think of Dick Morris, he has insider polling info and he advocates for an unconventional approach for Romney these next 18 days.
1 posted on 10/19/2012 8:23:02 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Springman; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; madison10; ...
If nothing else it would sure be nice to shove down the throat of the genius FReepers who think the whole state is a Detroit hood.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
2 posted on 10/19/2012 8:26:31 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Thoughts?

I thought Morris was suggesting a big win where worrying about OH was not necessary.


3 posted on 10/19/2012 8:28:36 AM PDT by tatown (Obama was right, it was a 'one term proposition')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

Yesterday Morris was talking landslide now he’s telling Mitt to go for Mi and Pa and not so much for Ohio as it’s very tough for him there. Ohio went GOP in ‘00 and ‘04. The do not win without Ohio. When is the last time Pa or Mi went GOP? If Morris is getting inside data then he’s using a ouija board to analyze it.


4 posted on 10/19/2012 8:29:47 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

If Romney/Ryan take Wisconsin, OH isn’t necessary. I feel it in my gut that they will win Wisconsin. And for the record, I believe they will also win Ohio.


5 posted on 10/19/2012 8:36:42 AM PDT by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

There are now a number of ways that Romney can win without Ohio, and he may well have to. It appears that the Republican brand has been badly damaged in Ohio (for what reasons, I am uncertain), but Romney has clearly not gained the traction there that he has in other states.


6 posted on 10/19/2012 8:38:34 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

Well, there are plenty of media markets that cover part of PA and part of OH, and part of MI and part of OH: big ad buys, targeting Obama’s hatred of coal in the first, and the decline of U.S. manufacturing under Obama, the deformed bankruptcies of GM and Chrysler notwithstanding, in the second are plainly in order. Plus a three state bus tour by Romney or Ryan and surrogates hitting all three.


7 posted on 10/19/2012 8:39:01 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

Dick is probably right in telling Romney to go for it but I predict without a doubt... that R/R will win Ohio.

LLS


9 posted on 10/19/2012 8:43:09 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

I wish there was some way for Romney to win without Ohio. Damn state is holding the rest of the country hostage.


12 posted on 10/19/2012 8:46:44 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

The headline on Morris’ website GOP should raise it sights. Very misleading headline troll.


13 posted on 10/19/2012 8:48:06 AM PDT by zt1053
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

A pretty smart analysis on Morris’s part, IMO.

The crux of his argument is that the usual swing states, of which Ohio is one, have been inundated by spending by both campaigns. Pouring more money into them is thus of diminishing returns (and I’d add, at some level may even backfire).

But those states that weren’t supposed to be so competitive are now close for Romney, and so spending their could impact the vote more effectively and therefore lead to wins.

For the GOP more generally, boosting the Romney vote in those ‘new’ swing states could pull another senator or two into office as well.

It’s easy to goof on him, but I think he’s one of the sharper, more originally thinking consultant-pollsters out there.


17 posted on 10/19/2012 8:54:54 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

It boggles my mind that anybody pays any attention to Dick Morris at all. In fact, it makes me nervous when he says Romney is going to win. Morris’ track record is for him to be 180 degrees wrong.

I see him quoted by Conservatives all the times on sites... even Intrade; as if quoting Morris validates their opinions. How in the world did he manage to achieve relevance?


21 posted on 10/19/2012 9:04:38 AM PDT by publana (Beware the olive branch extended by a Dem for it disguises a clenched fist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

On the ground here in PA I can tell you this is the first Presidential contest in my memory where my Yellow Dog Blue Collar Union Democrat neighbors were not in my face crowing about their candidate.

What you get is the Sound of Silence. No boasting, no lectures, no yard signs. Either they are secretly planning to vote for Romney or they are staying home.


22 posted on 10/19/2012 9:04:51 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist; All

This isn’t criticism against anyone who likes Morris’ ideas (I do after all) but doesn’t anyone else still think “Toe Sucker” anytime you see him, and subsequently your skin crawls uncontrollably?

I do appreciate his thoughts, but to this day take them with a grain of salt. Is there room for forgiveness for anyone? Of course (thank God), but that doesn’t mean we have to forget.

I’ll probably never trust him. After all he was the Clinton’s right hand attack dog wasn’t he? And we all know how incredibly devious they continue to be. I still think he’s some kind of mole working in secret for the Clintons in some fashion. Maybe I’m paranoid after all this time.

But that’s my right as an Amreican; I’m allowed to be paranoid for no reason at all.

Think about this though: who does it benefit to tear Kerry (and now Obama) down? Who does it benefit to warn the DNC of a House of Representatives TEA party insurgence (even though they didn’t listen of course) in 2010?

I guess one thing that might assuage my fears is to point to any harsh criticism on Morris’ part, against the CLINTONS. I haven’t seen that. Maybe I’ve missed it.

Anyone got something like that?


37 posted on 10/19/2012 9:36:35 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

When Obama called the people of PA ‘bitter clingers’ I think he hit a nerve...


39 posted on 10/19/2012 9:46:07 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

I don’t trust Dick Morris as far as I can spit up-wind.


43 posted on 10/19/2012 10:22:11 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BlueStateRightist

If Romney wins Michigan, which I think is possible, he’ll win Ohio as well. Demographics are too similar with more inner city areas in Michigan. Detroit along is bigger than all of Cleveland and Cincy combined, and all of it is like East Cleveland. The Republican base areas in Ohio are stronger than those in Michigan. There are a lot more places like our Ottawa and Livingston County in Ohio than in Michigan. We have five or six counties on that level. Ohio has about ten to twelve of them between the counties outside of Columbus and Cincinnati.


44 posted on 10/19/2012 10:48:00 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (Holding my nose one more time to get rid of Eric Holder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson