[Lakeshark]

If there is one thing that epitomizes the outrageousness of the democrat/media complex, it was Crowley's lie about Bambi's lie.

Unfortunately for them, they will now have to continue to carry the lie, focusing the country's attention on this horrendous mess the administration has made.

[Baynative]

It was two on one. Romney had to debate Candy and "Eye Candy".

[Lakeshark]

Should be a link, embedded in Michelle’s post: READ: http://twitchy.com/2012/10/16/and-now-cnn-walks-back-false-act-of-terror-fact-check/

[patriot08]

Mitt had to debate Obama and candypottomus.

[silverleaf]

Candy has established herself a legacy

[DManA]

Amazingly Crowley said she knew the question would come up so she reviewed the facts before hand and even brought the Rose Garden statement transcript - AND STILL GOT THE FACTS WRONG!

[left that other site]

Candy falls on her sword for Zero.

And, much like the Corpulent King in the Biblical Book of Judges, The sword gets lost in a sea of blubber.

[dead]

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

In the end, this will backfire. This will bring attention to Obama's lying, which the enemedia has tried to sweep under the carpet.

Too bad for Candy and the commies at CNN.

[sarasota]

Once said, the audience believes. And Crowley knows it.

[King Hawk]

Next debate moderator...Mark Levin!

[Red Badger]

IF THERE WAS EVER ANY DOUBT, IN ANYONE'S MIND, ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS BIAS IN THE MEDIA IN FAVOR OF OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS, THAT DOUBT SHOULD HAVE BEEN OBLITERATED LAST NIGHT BY CANDY CROWLEY...........

[Wings-n-Wind]

[JPG]

Blessing in disguise thanks to bon bon. What Obama did and didn't say and the administrations shuckin’ and jivin’ on Libya will be thoroughly exposed in the next debate.

[The Sons of Liberty]

CNN’s Crowley and company eat crow on Benghazi water-carrying for Obama

From the look of Crowley, there's not much she won't eat, but she successfully protected her boy by "conveniently" getting the facts wrong and making Mitt look bad in the process. How many of the people watching are going to bother to find out that she retracted her statement? The damage is done, but it should serve two purposes:
1. Be better prepared for the leftists moderators and;
2. In Monday's debate hit 0bama often and hard on this and the other countless foreign policy failures and specifically point out that Crowley lied to protect him!

0bama showed in this debate he's not above the street punk chi-town tactics and has absolutely no class, so be prepared!

[bronxville]

It appeared to be a set-up. Candy whipped out the transcript a little too fast - Obama said something like - Candy show the transcript - .say it again Candy - she did both times.

[The Great RJ]

Why does Candy Crowley remind me of Honey Boo Boo’s mother?

[ConradofMontferrat]

I don’t blame the Crow for her actions. I don’t blame any of the “moderators” for their Bagdad Bob performances.

These people are what they are. They are KNOWN quantities.

I BLAME THE ESTABLISHMENT PUBBIES FOR CAVING EVERY TIME THE SELECTION IS MADE FOR A DEBATE MODERATOR!

WTF? Neil Cavuto doesn’t get a shot? Why the Eff not? Its like the pubbies pee their pants every time these “debates” are planned, and the selected moderators are ALWAYS barking moonbat libtards! /r>

[chessplayer]

How’s that crow tasting, lapdogs?

---

Big deal. Millions saw her side with obama and call Romney a liar. Maybe half a million will see the retraction. She had a mission last night and she accomplished it. Thr retraction is next to worthless now.

[New Perspective]

[Lee'sGhost]

“How’s that crow tasting, lapdogs?”

That would by YOU, Pissy Chrissy Mathews.