Posted on 10/14/2012 8:28:48 AM PDT by Kozy
The murder of Ambassador Stevens at Benghazi is Obama's October surprise gone bad thanks to two former SEALS who were not supposed to be at Benghazi. But then I ran to the end of the story so let's back fill the datapoints.
First President Morsi first public statement to us was that he wanted the blind iman who first bombed the WTC released. Now Obama forever dedicated to appeasing the muslim world, bowing to them comes natural to him, knew that he had to obey Morsi's request however he couldn't release Omar Abdul-Rahman. There had to be a reason powerful enough to warrant his release. What better than to return to the Carter era of American hostages?
Obama sees a way to release the iman and secure his reelection in one act. So the wheels are set in motion. So he needed a cover story. Oh, the You Tube video that no one has seen, released in July. America could be shamed into releasing the iman because someone posted an obscure video and we have to follow Obama's lead and bow to muslims.
Next weaken the security at Benghazi by removing the security teams and employing Libyan bodyguards for the ambassador. In effect the embassy could not defend itself. The back channel had to be from the WH to the iman's legal representatives. It was suggested that Obama needed a reason to release the iman that America could agree to. What better than hostages? They were informed that there were no security forces at Benghazi to defend Stevens so over run the embassy and take him hostage. Really easy.
What was not planned for were former SEALS Donerty and Woods. They were not part of Stevens security detail; they happened to be in Benghazi working for the CIA to located missing surface-to-air missiles.
So the terrorists plan the assault on the embassy thinking there would be no resistance. Well two SEALS never back down from defending America and Americans. These two heros gave their lives fighting to protect our embassy and our ambassador. No telling how many peaceful muslim they transported to the after life however the terrorists who thought this was just a walk in the park protect now sought out the Americans to kill them not hold them captive. The over throw went from hostage taking to killing.
Now the WH knew the plan had blown up. There were no hostages only dead Americans. How to cover? Roll out the 14 minute video, no one has seen, as the cause. The WH cover up was in play.
With the killing of Ambassador Stevens, there could be no exchange, no October surprise. Oh what was the October surprise? Well Obama would spend a month negotiating with the terrorists for the release of Ambassador Stevens and finally and after his focused efforts on saving Stevens' live, Stevens would be released just before the election. Obama would have sucked out all the energy from the campaign as everyone would be watching him, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, negotiate for the release of Stevens. The world would applaud him, the muslim would have their murderous iman back, he would be reelected and the destruction of America who go on.
We can only thank every day these SEALS for defending America with their lives.
A lot of datapoints, Benghazi, President Morsi, SEALS, blind iman, 14 minute You Tube video; withdrawal of security from embassy, October surprise and Obama's October surprise.
Wonder which story makes more sense? Mine of the one the WH spins every day that keeps changing as the lies are exposed.
Sounds WAY MORE plausible than any of the stories the White Hut is putting out.
The libs always thought Reagan won by doing something similar. It was a lie, of course, but as much as they like projecting I can easily believe the gist of your theory.
Not stellar writing, but you know what? Your scenario is ABUNDANTLY believable and makes the most logical sense to this twisted imbroglio that I have seen so far.
Obama likes complex, covert treachery that promptly runs aground —a liberal Nixon, but super dumb.
FITS HIS M.O. LIKE A GLOVE...!
My "dream" scenario .... Seal Team 6 perp walking Obama & The Mooch out of the White House
Except they forget Reagan wasn’t running as the incumbent.
Campaigning with one or more members of the Diplomatic Corps being held hostage by third-world barbarians, then securing their release by releasing another murderous barbarian is NOT a sure-fire recipe for electoral success.
Great job - completely fits all the hard data we have, and fits this egotistical admin to a “T”.
That would be glorious!
I guess we’ll find out in a few weeks whether the above is true. Any administration that would attempt so crazy a plan will do something equally crazy as exigency demands. (Lotta’ slippage in their vote count these days)Then again they seem to have armed foaming crazies in Mexico as a means of attacking our own Constitution...so...
That’s the only cogent and consistent opinion as to what really happened over there that I have read. I am sorry to say you are probably right.
I can’t find any legitimate reason why our embassy wasn’t secure. There is no reasonable reason I can come up with.
It’s 9/11 anniversary in Libya. Why on that day, or on ANY day, would we not have Marines guarding our embassy?
Hmmm, a very interesting theory. It does make one think doesn’t it?
Your theory is easy to prove.
Look for a series of questionable single gunshot wound suicides and single engine aircraft accidents involving people in a position to know the truth.
no......
To complex and fragile to be real
I agree. Get the piece edited then let the world read it!
Mine has long been Lakin walking them out in handcuffs, out the back door past the other garbage and straight into Lakin's old cell for the rest of eternity. I'll give you Seal Team 6 escorting them out and am adding the Hawaii Dept. of Health, Gov. Pothead to Leavenworth party and most of the Hill. Heck, just fence off D.C. with razor wire and call it a day.
It fits.
From savior/negotiator to betrayer/deceiver.
Whether there was a promise or not I'm sure Morsi was disappointed.
There were LOTS of Muzzies at the DNC convention (probably because of Obama's stance on this issue and they voted "NO!" at the convention.
I still think THIS video had something to do with the terrorist attack in Benghazi.
This would definitely offer additional support for why Obama went to bed, thinking he knew exactly where the “missing” ambassador was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.